Their justification of kashmiri jihad will happen even after the jihadi tells them they are fighting for Islam and Kashmir is secondary.
Remember the Barkha Dutt interview of a stone pelter in hospital?
We should use these incidents to demolish sympathy that jihadis want to gain here.
And targeted killings are difficult to deal with.
Only decentralisation of defence will help.
This means gun culture for kashmiri minorities.
But remember, librandoos might use this as a precedent for a law like communal violence bill.
Agree with the gun culture, but the thing is, they are, after all minorities. Sooner than later, the very same guns will end up with the jihadis. And you cannot be sure those will end up in only Kashmir post that.
And the whitewashing business of the librandus and jihadis has tactic support of congress and left governments, whereas nationalist governments hardly provide us with that cover fire. There is a reason why a jihadi can get away by whitewashing talibfags or even making fun of hindu Gods, while a hindu even quoting the Quran for the violence it propogates gets called out and dozens of FIRs are filed against him in all parts of India, including in UP where you have a nationalist government.
The thing is, government (both state and centre)
have to shed this sickular bias and give tactic support to nationalists throughout India. Without state backing, no amount of narrative buliding is going to work against jihadi sympathisers. Also, I'm not even sure if GoI has a clear public view on islamic radicalism in India (we have one of the largest radical muslims in the world). Government publications feature left wing extremism (LWE) etc. as threat but I haven't seen much publications etc on radical islamism for sure.