abingdonboy
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2010
- Messages
- 8,084
- Likes
- 33,803
Ask the armyAre they really serious about procuring jetpacks?
Ask the armyAre they really serious about procuring jetpacks?
now think how much death gratuity they will pay for 4-5 deads, that money could have bought 2 LSV or other armoured car with mounted guns.Do you guys know just 1B$ can get us 10,000 Mahindra ASLV..
That's such small amount for a country with 75B$ annual defence budget.
I need to know which part of the whole I.A.- Bureaucracy cabal is causing the hindrance to procurement.
institutionalized shittery. nothing else.now think how much death gratuity they will pay for 4-5 deads, that money could have bought 2 LSV or other armoured car with mounted guns.
Equipment is what evolves tactics.Imo 99% of you guys are wrong
The issue is not with equipments but problem with military leadership, operational acume at tactical level and abject failure to learn from past mistakes and evolve
Last fews months jihadis have outplayed our officers multiple times , baiting them successfully at ambush site itself or onroute to reported location etc yet no one in the army seems to have learnt their lessons
They rush to reported areas of concern seemingly without sanitizing the route itself, do they think terrorists are that dumb that they will keep playing by any set rules and not innovate
If government were to provide tanks to move troops to reported location, even then given the way terrorists are outplaying the army they will negate the tanks with appropriate weapons
The onus lies with military and police solely
And matter of fact one doesn't fight enemies inside own house they fight and eliminate them in their houses, so why military and govt not being proactive is my only concern. We should every month strike across border to keep their heads down , raise the costs at their side so that we don't end up fighting inside own house
If we end up fighting inside own house , even with alien type weapons and protection we will suffer casualties, that's given because of proximity, which reveals vulnerability
Enemy is always proactive, they learn , thet get instructed , they get help from both outside and inside so only best way to fight them is inside their houses and deter them from coming in
Long story short sole responsibility imo is on army / police , they are not upto the task , they are not evolving nor learning from their mistakes. Jihadis are out playing them most of the times
It’s always either Porki Regulars or PISSG mujeets except the truth is that these are just regular terrorists that planned these attacks. You don’t have to be porky regulars to plan an ambush or conduct a raid. A lot of terrorists groups from around world conduct ambushes and raids. I don’t understand mindset of some Indians in showing these camel pee drinkers as some kind of super elite dangerous threat.Rumors have been floating that a lot of pak army regulars have been infiltrating for the last few years. The following post, for instance, claims that terrorists are Afghan war veterans;
Imo noEquipment is what evolves tactics.
It’s crazy how the army and the CRPF have almost reversed their positions from they where 30 years ago.
Army used to be the killing machine. Now it’s crpf in LWE corridor.
I don’t if to laugh or cry seeing that motorcycle helmet.if trucks can go there so can light apc's just coz army does not have any does not mean it can't be done .
These vehicles don't even have a roof gunner position , they were meant for civilian jobs not going in a fucking firefight .
even Mexicans police knows how important a belt fed is to repel an ambush .
View attachment 233473
what do we use?
first we rarely deploy them , only about 2 in a convoy and the ones that are deployed are not well protected and use bren and insas LMG and sometimes even AKs that have a 30 rounds capacity and jam every few rounds ,which in a firefight will be empty in a few seconds and by the time you will reload they will either pin you down or drop you .
Most probably they don't not even have belt fed MGs . what do you expect will happen ?
View attachment 233475
ANA and US used to deploy gunners on every vehicles .
View attachment 233476
If the vehicle was a armored and their would have been a man with a M60 on top the outcome would have been different
Do you realize that the US could have literally wiped Afghaistan from the world map and made a massive volcanic crater out of it if it had wished to do so.If equipments had been a factor USA would not have run from away from Afghanistan, Iraq etc and our ass battered in Lanka
Now promoting Pakistani OSINT handle's propaganda?
name matches with what shiv aroor sharedNow promoting Pakistani OSINT handle's propaganda?
You are really into casualty lists all this time on DFI.
I have noticed this multiple times.
Do you realize that the US could have literally wiped Afghaistan from the world map and made a massive volcanic crater out of it if it had wished to do so.
The Americans were not defeated militarily,they lost it politically because the Afghans they entrusted upon proved to be massively incompetent and criminally corrupt.
The Afghan soldiers ran away from battle field without a fight and the politicians swindled away the aid money to build mansions instead of feeding the people.
As for equipment,what logic does it make to travel in a tarpaulin top truck and gypsy which is not even safe from knife stabbing ?
Atleast had they had an APC,they would have a fighting chance to retaliate.
yes I am, cause casualties isn't just another number for me. have seen families receive coffins and fall apartNow promoting Pakistani OSINT handle's propaganda?
You are really into casualty lists all this time on DFI.
I have noticed this multiple times.
Should have directly shared the Shiv Aroor's quoted data instead.name matches with what shiv aroor shared
In every single instance you named, the war was won ON PAPER but lost in the decision making and lack of strategic thought.Imo no
Equipments provides leverage until the enemy finally finds counter to it eventually
If equipments had been a factor USA would not have run from away from Afghanistan, Iraq etc , nor soviets would have lost in Afghanistan and our ass battered in Lanka
End of the day it is the human factor which matters most , their experience, their acumen , their intelligence, their ability to adapt, when to fight, when not to , situational awareness, evolve and adapt tactics, motivation, moral etc etc
Equipments are as good as the soldier and
the tactics being run by the soldier
Same ways india lost Lanka becuase of the incomptence of sir Rajiv Gandhi sending them to be equipped as peacekeepers with battalions not having any of their heavy weaponry and only small arms.Do you realize that the US could have literally wiped Afghaistan from the world map and made a massive volcanic crater out of it if it had wished to do so.
The Americans were not defeated militarily,they lost it politically because the Afghans they entrusted upon proved to be massively incompetent and criminally corrupt.
The Afghan soldiers ran away from battle field without a fight and the politicians swindled away the aid money to build mansions instead of feeding the people.
As for equipment,what logic does it make to travel in a tarpaulin top truck and gypsy which is not even safe from knife stabbing ?
Atleast had they had an APC,they would have a fighting chance to retaliate.
All these literature no point broIn every single instance you named, the war was won ON PAPER but lost in the decision making and lack of strategic thought.
You cannot launch night operations without NVGs. If your gun gets jammed you need a sidearm. IAs tactics are very traditional because it relies on traditional gear.
aroor shared it 2hrs agoShould have directly shared the Shiv Aroor's quoted data instead.
What orgasm does members achieve by sharing Pakistani Twitter handles data here?