bhramos
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2009
- Messages
- 25,644
- Likes
- 37,250
is it really true??????1 fortnight = 14 days
so hold on, it still too early to open the champagne.
1 fortnight = 14 days!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
is it really true??????1 fortnight = 14 days
so hold on, it still too early to open the champagne.
i already know rafale has won the competition. :taunt1:
haha !
Rafale now on par with EFT in the polls...
Rafale sure is the best for IAF.
i hope all this favour for the rafale is not due to sympathy for its ' not-a-single-piece-sold ' status .i said that months ago :taunt1:
Not doubting you but are you serious? That would make the IAF rival the Smithsonian air and space museum in variety of fighters. I have heard 'rumours' of such a split earlier but there are too many practical issues to consider.i hope all this favour for the rafale is not due to sympathy for its ' not-a-single-piece-sold ' status .
we indians are great for having a bleeding heart rescuing the weak and meek of the world .
anyway , a mig 29 pilot i know told me that both planes will be selected !!:shocked:
that he would be flying typhoons a few years down the line , and mirage pilots would fly rafales !!
Either he is misinformed, he knows something else or he was just playing with you.anyway , a mig 29 pilot i know told me that both planes will be selected !!:shocked:
that he would be flying typhoons a few years down the line , and mirage pilots would fly rafales !!
At 8 a year, France is going to take 16 years to finish the same. Production for 180 Rafale will go on till 2018.Now I am wondering whether IAF is even interested in keeping our pilots alive....7 years for 126 jets... pathetic.
Rafale may have had a lead in technical evaluations. But EF is simply the better aircraft in A2A, no matter how you look it.This is a question.
After many technical evaluations (Swiss, Dutch etc...), we know that the Rafale is a much better aircraft.
But, if you look at the poll, you see that the EF is leading. How do you explain this fact ?
My explanation is that some people vote for the aircraft they want to sell to India because they are from UK or from Germany etc...
I don't think that people think that the weaker aircraft "should win"...
For sure, people don't like the truth.
Do you have an other explanation?
The Swiss came to a different conclusion, as we know. They attested better qualities as well in a2g as in a2a to Rafale and the difference was not really close, according to the Armasuisse evaluation from 09...Rafale may have had a lead in technical evaluations. But EF is simply the better aircraft in A2A, no matter how you look it.
It depends on what their requirements were. Their technical specifications may be different from IAF's, Austria's or even Luftwaffe's.The Swiss came to a different conclusion, as we know. They attested better qualities as well in a2g as in a2a to Rafale and the difference was not really close, according to the Armasuisse evaluation from 09...
What a stupid article. I did not even bother reading it.
When the Su-30 deal was signed the Rupee was 37 to a Dollar.
Monthly Exchange Rate Average (Indian Rupee, American Dollar) 1997 - x-rates
Now it is 53 to a Dollar. The MKI program was bigger than the MRCA program when it started.
Ah! Thanks for pointing out, I did not check the link.Its that ajay shukla classic from Business standard.
After unsuccessful campaigns on US fighters, F-35 and then gripen, he is into money thing.