Imported Single Engine Fighter Jet Contest

mendosa

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2017
Messages
382
Likes
1,402
If it comes down to a choice between the F-16 and Gripen, the latter will be have to be the choice.
https://twitter.com/SJha1618?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
So IAF and its cheap moles are back to their cheap tricks again.

When it comes to F16 vs Gripe? wtf would it come to F16 vs Gripen? does IAF think we are retards? they should be made to submit a white paper explaining why the Tejas Mk2 is not a suitable contender.

Getting real sick of this shit.
 

Cutting Edge 2

Space Power
Regular Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
984
Likes
1,969
Defence procurement: No consensus on strategic partnership


Finance and Defence Minister Arun Jaitley will chair the Defence Acquisition Council on May 15

Defence Minister Jaitley holds first meeting with stakeholders on the key issue

NEW DELHI, MAY 11:
The Defence Ministry seems to have gone back to where it started on the issue of selecting strategic partners (SP) for various procurement programmes.

Defence Minister Arun Jaitley held his first meeting on the issue with the stakeholders here on Thursday. Some of the issues that emerged as major stumbling blocks were that of grand-parenting and price discovery, according to sources.

A top official in the Ministry told BusinesLine requesting anonymity that, “There is still no meeting ground yet on the issue. The industry is severely divided and a consensus looks difficult at this point. However, the Ministry is keen to push the policy.” Under the SP model there will be four broad categories – combat aircraft, helicopters, submarines and armoured vehicles – within which the government will award programmes to the private sector.

Curbing monopolies
Hence, the Defence Ministry is of the view that “at least” two strategic partners should be allowed in each segment so as to arrive at a “reasonable” price discovery otherwise it may lead to a monopolistic situation, sources said.

Sources also added that some of the defence firms have made it clear to the government they will not support “open competition” in a particular programme in which they already have the required competencies.

For example, if the government intends to procure helicopters for the armed forces, then it should accord first preference only to those companies that have a proven track record in producing helicopters and not those which have been selected as strategic partners for making helicopters.

“The Ministry is working towards institutionalising a transparent, objective and functional mechanism to encourage broader participation of the private sector in defence manufacturing under the Make in India framework,” stated a release by the Defence Ministry after the meeting with stakeholders.

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), which is chaired by Jaitley, will be meeting on May 15 to decide on the draft policy.

But considering the divergent views within the industry, it seems unlikely that a final call will be taken on the matter, sources added.


Once approved, the policy will be inducted as a separate chapter in the Defence Procurement Procedure 2016.

“There is a lot at stake here. There will be fierce competition and fierce rivalry if the SP policy is finalised,” said Amit Cowshish, former financial advisor to Defence Ministry and currently a Distinguished Fellow at IDSA.

The SP policy is aimed at boosting manufacturing of critical defence armaments by the private sector.

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com...s-on-strategic-partnership/article9693650.ece
 

FergisNahk

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2016
Messages
11
Likes
15
Defence ministry unveils “strategic partner” policy for defence production




By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 12th May 17


On Thursday, before a closed-door gathering of private defence industry chiefs in New Delhi, the ministry of defence (MoD) unveiled its long-delayed policy for identifying “strategic partners” (SPs) – chosen companies that will partner global “original equipment manufacturers” (OEMs) in building defence platforms in India.

While the MoD has not released details of the new policy, three individuals present at the meeting have shared with Business Standard the new policy’s scope, and the criteria and procedures for selecting SPs and foreign OEMs that they would partner.

The policy’s initial aim is to shortlist six top companies as SPs in four technology segments – single engine fighter aircraft, helicopters, submarines and armoured fighting vehicles. A company can be nominated an SP in only one segment, and will have to indicate its preferences while applying.

In 2015, the Dhirendra Singh Committee had recommended selecting SPs to build defence equipment. Last year the VK Aatre Task Force laid down criteria for selecting SPs in ten technology segments, including aero engines, artillery guns, ammunition and smart materials. For now, however, the SP policy has been confined to just four segments to cater for urgently needed battlefield equipment.

This includes single-engine fighters, for which the air force has already initiated procurement. The navy has framed its requirements for its next six submarines under Project 75-I. And the army, after exploring the indigenous option of developing its Future Main Battle Tank with the Defence R&D Organisation, has changed its mind and issued specifications for buying foreign tanks.

For these procurements, which will all involve substantial in-country manufacture, the new policy envisages shortlisting Indian SPs and foreign OEMs through separate, but simultaneous, processes.

Shortlisting of Indian SPs

The first six SPs will be chosen from amongst Indian private firms in a two-stage process. To make it past the “first gate”, aspirant companies would have to meet stipulated financial and technical criteria. They must be Indian companies, as defined in the Companies Act, 2013; and have no more than 49 per cent foreign holding, with no “pyramiding” of foreign holding.

The MoD’s stipulated financial criteria weed out all except large, established firms. These include: consolidated turnover of at least Rs 4,000 crore rupees for each of the last three financial years; capital assets of Rs 2,000 crore; and a minimum credit rating of CRISIL/ICRA “A” (stable).

The MoD will also consider companies’ records of wilful default, debt restructuring and non-performing assets.

Companies making it past the “first gate” would undergo “site verification” in what is termed “Stage II evaluation”. A MoD team would visit company facilities to evaluate financial parameters and technical capability, with equal weightage given to both.

In this second round of financial evaluation, it will be ensured that the applicant company’s solvency ratio (external debt to net worth ratio) is no higher than 1.5:1; and its modified solvency ratio (external debt plus financial guarantees to net worth ratio) is no higher than 2.5:1. The debt to EBIDTA (earnings before interest, depreciation, tax and amortisation) ratio can be no higher than 3.

The “technical evaluation” will scrutinise the companies’ projects (launched, on-going, and also completed) over the last five years; the vendors it has developed; its research & development (R&D) budget and successes; certification and accreditation; and the number of certified quality auditors and quality assurance/control professionals as a percentage of its total employees.
* * * *

Strategic Partner requirements

Financial criteria
Technical criteria
Stage I evaluation



Should be an Indian company, as per Companies Act, 2013
Company should demonstrate “system of systems” integration capability
More than 50% capital owned by Indian citizens or companies

Controlled and managed by Indian residents

Majority Indian representation on Board of Directors

Maximum 49% FDI in company, without pyramiding

Consolidated turnover of at least Rs 4,000 crore for last three years

Capital assets of at least Rs 2,000 crore

Minimum credit rating of CRISIL/ICRA “A” (stable)

Will consider past record of wilful default, debt restructuring and non-performing assets



Stage II evaluation


Company’s solvency ratio (external debt to net worth ratio) no higher than 1.5:1
Company projects (launched, on-going, and completed) over the last five years
Modified solvency ratio (external debt + financial guarantees to net worth ratio) no higher than 2.5:1
Certification and accreditation; and the certified quality auditors as a percentage of total employees
Debt to EBIDTA (earnings before interest, depreciation, tax and amortisation) ratio no higher than 3
Research & development (R&D) budget as percentage of turnover; and R&D successes in last 5 years
Return on invested capital (RoI): EBIDTA divided by average invested capital
Vendors the company has developed

CAPEX for plant and machinery annual and aggregated (for last 5 years)
Shortlisting of foreign OEMs

OEMs for each weapons platform will be selected primarily based on the “range and depth of transfer of technology” they offer India. The indigenous content they propose, the eco-system and supplier base they will develop, their plan for skilling Indian workers and future R&D in India will be evaluated in shortlisting OEMs.

Preferably two or more OEMs will be shortlisted for each technology segment, but acquisitions will be taken forward even if just a single OEM makes the cut.

* * * *
Shortlisting of foreign OEMs


Main factor: range, depth and scope of technology transfer offered to Indian SP
Extent of indigenous content proposed
Extent of eco-system of Indian vendors
Measures to support SP in integrating platform
Plans to train skilled Indian manpower
Extent of future R&D planned in India
Finalising a procurement

Once a shortlist of SPs and OEMs is available in a particular technology segment, the MoD can proceed with procuring that platform by issuing a “request for proposals” (RFP) to SPs in that technology segment. The RFP will mention shortlisted OEMs, so that the SPs can engage with them, choose an OEM partner, and submit an offer in collaboration with that company.

The MoD would then evaluate the offers, giving 80 per cent weightage to the price bid and 20 per cent to “segment specific capabilities”. The winning company, which has the best aggregate score, would have to sign a contract that includes a ten-year “performance based logistics” contract (which guarantees a certain equipment availability at all times), life-cycle support, including the establishment of testing and proving laboratories, and equipment upgrades further down the line.

After the meeting, a MoD release stated: “Industry representatives welcomed efforts of the Ministry to put in place such a framework and offered several positive and constructive suggestions. The Ministry has taken due note of these proposals, which would be considered while finalising the policy in this regard.”

Sources say the policy, largely in its present form, will be cleared in a meeting of the MoD’s apex Defence Acquisition Council on May 15.

The finalised SP policy will be included as Chapter VI of the Defence Procurement Policy of 2016, which was published last year with Chapter VI blank.
 

FergisNahk

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2016
Messages
11
Likes
15
Complete Pointers from Stage I and Stage II Evaluation below. Missed out in the above.


Strategic Partner requirements



Financial criteria Technical criteria
Stage I evaluation
  • Should be an Indian company, as per Companies Act, 2013 Company should demonstrate “system of systems” integration capability
  • More than 50% capital owned by Indian citizens or companies
  • Controlled and managed by Indian residents
  • Majority Indian representation on Board of Directors
  • Maximum 49% FDI in company, without pyramiding
  • Consolidated turnover of at least Rs 4,000 crore for last three years
  • Capital assets of at least Rs 2,000 crore
  • Minimum credit rating of CRISIL/ICRA “A” (stable)
  • Will consider past record of wilful default, debt restructuring and non-performing assets
  • Company should demonstrate “system of systems” integration capability



Stage II evaluation

  • Company’s solvency ratio (external debt to net worth ratio) no higher than 1.5:1 Company projects (launched, on-going, and completed) over the last five years
  • Modified solvency ratio (external debt + financial guarantees to net worth ratio) no higher than 2.5:1 Certification and accreditation; and the certified quality auditors as a percentage of total employees
  • Debt to EBIDTA (earnings before interest, depreciation, tax and amortisation) ratio no higher than 3 Research & development (R&D) budget as percentage of turnover; and R&D successes in last 5 years
  • Return on invested capital (RoI): EBIDTA divided by average invested capital Vendors the company has developed
  • CAPEX for plant and machinery annual and aggregated (for last 5 years)
  • Company projects (launched, on-going, and completed) over the last five years
  • Debt to EBIDTA (earnings before interest, depreciation, tax and amortisation) ratio no higher than 3
  • Research & development (R&D) budget as percentage of turnover; and R&D successes in last 5 years
  • Vendors the company has developed


 

WolfPack86

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Messages
10,556
Likes
16,993
Country flag
SAAB Says Its Ready To Build 150 Gripen Jets For India

Gripen E on target for debut flight in second quarter
by Craig Hoyle

SAAB’s Gripen E remains on course to make its flight debut during the second quarter of this year, as the Swedish manufacturer steps up its sales efforts for the new-generation fighter and its earlier C/D-standard variant.
Confirming that lead prototype aircraft 39-8 will get airborne before the end of the second quarter, head of Gripen Jerker Ahlqvist says: “So far, everything is going according to plan, and it looks really promising.” Deliveries of the GE Aviation F414-powered jet will start in 2019 for the Swedish air force, followed by aircraft for export customer Brazil.
Low-speed taxi tests with the Gripen E commenced at SAAB’s Linköping production site late last year, and Ahlqvist says the company is currently validating its software in preparation for the first flight. Aircraft 39-8 is currently in ground test, while the second of its eventual three prototypes has entered the final assembly.

Ahlqvist notes that SAAB’s decision to use an app-type software architecture on the Gripen E is already proving successful. “We see that corrections to the software that we need to do go very quickly,” he says. “We can make a change and then introduce a new software load into the aircraft within days – something that previously could take weeks or even months. That gives us confidence that the program will meet its schedule and milestones.”
Richard Smith, head of Gripen marketing and sales, says SAAB is increasing its efforts to add to the number of customers for the type, in both its C/D and E/F standards. Discussions continue with Botswana and Slovakia over their potential acquisition plans, and the company has just submitted its response to a Bulgarian request for proposals. It has also provided early information to India linked to a potential requirement for 150 single-engined fighters and is eyeing a navy requirement in the same country for its proposed aircraft carrier-capable Gripen Maritime model.
“The market looks optimistic,” says Smith. “We really need to bring in as many prospects as possible, in order to close our target, which is a contract every year.” The company currently has no orders for the C/D variant but has previously said it could deliver examples within 18 months of securing a production contract.
Also referring to potential opportunities for the Gripen in Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Finland, Indonesia, Malaysia and Switzerland, Smith says: “We’re in a very good position right now, having both platforms.”
Meanwhile, SAAB has begun updating the Czech Republic’s Gripen C/Ds with the type’s latest MS20-standard software, which entered operational use in Sweden last year. Hungary has also contracted the company to make the same modification to its fleet, and Ahlqvist says it is also in early dialogue with South Africa and Thailand about a similar update.
http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2017/05/saab-says-it-is-ready-to-build-150.html
 

Kay

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
1,029
Likes
1,354
Country flag
Things are looking good for Tejas Mk2. IAF is in a bind. Between F-16 and Gripen, is the better plane. But Mk2 will be as good.

IAF wants Gripen. But to get it, it has to reject F-16, which will anger Trump. F-16 is a plane you can neither reject nor accept.

If you buy F-16, Modi will be criticized for trying to appease Trump. The jobs lost in IT cannot be brought back by buying F-16. Again, F-16 will not be fully made (assembled) in India because of Trump. IAF will be saddled with a plane which Pakistan knows and operates for years - a definite loss in prestige for IAF. In short, Modi will have nothing to show against an F-16 deal.

Rejecting F-16 will anger Trump and can lead to further IT visa cuts, job losses, etc.

So there can be no decision around F-16 (which is no decision for Gripen). This is all good news for Tejas as IAF has to no option but to support and accept it.
 

Cutting Edge 2

Space Power
Regular Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
984
Likes
1,969
MoD approves ‘Strategic Partnership’ policy, CCS nod pending
NEW DELHI, MAY 20:

After a long wait, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has finally granted its nod to the draft ‘Strategic Partnership’ (SP) policy even it was forwarded to the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) for its final approval.

“The draft proposal has been finalised today. Within a month the policy will be rolled out as part the 2016 Defence Procurement Procedure, once the CCS approves it,” a top MoD official told BusinessLine who refused to be named.

Post some final touch-up by the Finance Ministry, Prime Minister Narendra Modi-headed CCS is expected to put its stamp on the policy in around one month, sources said.

The “broad contours” of the policy was finalised at a meeting of the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) held here on Saturday, under the chairmanship of Finance and Defence Minister Arun Jaitley, stated a release issued by the MoD.

Once approved by the CCS, it will form Chapter VII of the DPP, which was released in March last year by former Defence Minister and Chief Minister of Goa Manohar Parrikar.

High-end defence equipments

Objective of the SP policy is to boost manufacturing of armaments by the private sector companies, which will be enlisted into separate categories to manufacture a particular defence platform in partnership with foreign OEMs to make high-end defence equipments.

In the initial phase, the policy will be implemented in selected segments – fighter aircraft (including helicopters), submarine and armoured vehicle. More segments will be added as the policy matures, the MoD release said.

“The policy, which was developed through extensive stakeholder consultations with Indian industry, envisages the establishment of long-term strategic partnerships with qualified Indian industry majors through a transparent and competitive process wherein the Indian industry partners would tie up with global OEMs to seek technology transfers and manufacturing know-how to set up domestic manufacturing infrastructure and supply chains,” it stated.

SP policy

The DAC had last met on May 15 to discuss the SP policy. Prior to that, on May 11 Jaitley held his first meeting with the industry since becoming the Defence Minister on this matter. And by Saturday the policy was finalised.

Industry sources said that the government has not consulted them since then on the reservations out forward by them and has swiftly finalised the policy.

Once approved, defence programmes worth Rs. 200,00 crore are expected gain momentum, including naval utility helicopters (NUH) for Rs. 20,000 crore, the P-75 Scorpene submarine programme worth Rs. 60,000 crore, the single- or twin-engine fighter-jet deal worth about Rs. 1,00,000 crore and some other projects.

As far as foreign direct investment (FDI) in defence is concerned, the MoD is likely to allow 49 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) and that there will be no “pyramiding of FDI” in the Indian holding companies by foreign partners, so that the key decision-making rests in the hands of the Indian firm.

(This article was published on May 20, 2017)

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com...hip-policy-ccs-nod-pending/article9708805.ece
 

mavles ihctep

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
554
Likes
599
Ambani is a known crook,their only aim is loot.They don't give f¥ck about technology or indigenisation.These crooks will simply assemble foreign aircrafts and sell it to iaf in exorbitant prices.
 

Zero-Sum-Game

Regular Member
Joined
May 6, 2017
Messages
113
Likes
245
Ambani is a known crook,their only aim is loot.They don't give f¥ck about technology or indigenisation.These crooks will simply assemble foreign aircrafts and sell it to iaf in exorbitant prices.
Bhai I don't want to rain on your Ambani bashing but I think you are confusing it with Adani group . They both are separate entities .
PS I don't think this tender or project will have any favourable impact on our indigenous development of aircrafts but will turn us into a vulnerable customer to foreign manufacturers. We will still be the importers sans the tag.
 

WolfPack86

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Messages
10,556
Likes
16,993
Country flag
NEW POLICY TO HELP INDIAN DEFENCE MANUFACTURING FIRMS GAIN CUTTING-EDGE CAPABILITIES

The defence ministry’s decision to allow private companies to build fighter jets, submarines, armoured vehicles is likely to help defence manufacturing firms

While Tata Motors and Reliance Infrastructure have taken steps to build fighter jets, L&T could enter the submarine space while armoured vehicles could be an area of interest for Mahindra and TATA Motors

New Delhi: The defence ministry’s decision to allow companies outside state control to build fighter jets, submarines and armoured vehicles is likely to help Indian defence manufacturing firms.

Larsen and Toubro Ltd, Ashok Leyland Ltd, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd, Reliance Infrastructure Ltd, Tata Group, Punj Lloyd, Adani Group and Bharat Forge Ltd, which have existing defence businesses, are likely to benefit the most from the decision, analysts say.

While TATA and Reliance Infra have taken steps to build aircraft, Larsen and Toubro could enter the submarine space while armoured vehicles could be an area of interest for Bharat Forge, Mahindra and Tata, said Laxman Kumar Behera, senior research fellow, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA).z“This was a long time in the making. Finally the government and industry have agreed to it. It will be interesting to see how it unfolds,” Behera said.

For one, there will be a question of oversight over private companies and whether the defence ministry has the wherewithal to do so, he said.

Second, there would be a need to evolve a mechanism on how to deal with contractual changes, according to Behera. So far, it was easy for the government to seek a change in a contract as most of the companies were state owned, private companies may not be able to adjust to this easily.

Thirdly, the future of state-owned giants including Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd and Mazagon Dock Ltd will need to be redefined as over time private players will create parallel manufacturing lines. For now, these firms have orders for many years but after that the government will have to figure out how to balance or take the international route where private sector dominate the space, said Behera. “We can’t have two sets of players in the same segment. You cannot sustain two aircraft lines. It’s a clear indication that government is looking away from the PSUs. In the long term, you can have a scenario of privatization of PSUs,” he added.
On Saturday, defence ministry gave the go-ahead to this strategic partnership model after deliberating on it for the second time this week.

“Breaking new ground, the defence acquisition council, under the chairmanship of defence minister Arun Jaitley, on Saturday finalized the broad contours of a policy aimed at engaging the Indian private sector in the manufacture of high-tech defence equipment in India,” the ministry said in a statement.

The policy is likely to be examined by the finance ministry before being considered by the cabinet committee on security.

“The policy will give a boost to the ‘Make in India’ policy in the defence sector and set Indian industry on the path to acquiring cutting-edge capabilities which will contribute to building of self-reliance in the vital sector,” the ministry said.

This model was proposed by the Dhirendra Singh Committee in July 2015. It had said that for the “Make in India” initiative to become wider in the defence sector, the government should adopt a strategic partnership model, whereby a private firm is chosen for the development of a specific identified platform.

Last year, the then-defence minister Manohar Parrikar had announced that the policy on SP model would be unveiled soon.
http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2017/05/new-policy-to-help-indian-defence.html
 
Last edited:

Cutting Edge 2

Space Power
Regular Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
984
Likes
1,969
MoD panel for autonomous weapons acquisition body in charge of policy, acquisition and exports
May 23, 2017, 10.38 AM IST

NEW DELHI: Batting for a radical change to make military procurements more efficient and time bound, a high level committee, government appointed committee has recommended the setting up of an autonomous defence acquisition organization(DAO) within the defence ministry that will be in charge of formulating policy, planning and executing weapons purchases for the armed forces.

Setting up a detailed roadmap for the creation of the new organization, the committee, headed by management guru Dr Pritam Singh has recommended the dismantling of the current system that is described as ‘diffused across the MoD and services’ and is prone to bureaucratic delays.

The report, prepared with a number of industry experts as well as senior defence ministry bureaucrats, is now being studied by the government, with defence minister Arun Jaitley keen to roll out reforms to unlock the potential of the defence sector.

The committee has recommended that the word acquisition be used instead of procurement for the new organization as it would cover a spectrum of activities, from policy making, planning and budgeting to execution.




The main objective of the DAO will be to provide a single point responsibility for acquisition of capabilities – combat platforms, systems and equipment as per plans and within the allocation of funds and the time agreed.

At present, acquisition is carried out within the defence ministry by a system that includes an additional secretary as the head, representatives from the services and several officials from the administrative services who move in and out from different ministries and sectors.

The idea, according to officials aware of the matter, is to create an organization that will not fall into the ambit of normal rules of the government. A long standing problem has been that officers and officials deputed to procurement hardly spend 3-5 years in the department before moving on to other unrelated duties, diluting a professional set up.

This issue has been addressed in the DAO by recommending a professional cadre that will man posts and will be independent of government rules on postings and deputation. “The normal rules will not apply. People will be able to have longer tenures and there will be a flexibility in hiring people, even from outside the organized cadres,” sources told ET.

To be headed by a CEO, who would nominally be equivalent to a Secretary, the DAO will have eight directors responsible for different areas of acquisition, including one with the critical responsibility of interfacing with the industry and governing exports. To make the organization autonomous, it has been recommended that it would be funded with a percentage of the funds that it utilizes every financial year. In the first year, this has been recommended to be Rs 400 crore.

While the committee has submitted a detailed roadmap for execution, the defence ministry will have its task cut out to roll out the reform, given that stiff opposition is expected from within the existing system on the radical changes recommended. Experts believe that it can take the plan two years to roll out – to both address the concerns of the system and create the systems required to set up the new organization.

Read more at:
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top