If american article of 1987 F-16 shoot down is to be taken at face value. Then believe in this article as wellWe don't blindly believe the Americans or anyone. But please answer my question: is the NYTimes article about
a PAF F-16 shot down by Afghanistan correct ?
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/04/04/did-india-shoot-down-a-pakistani-jet-u-s-count-says-no/
IAF chief has no credibility outside India. Nobody is believing IAF word. Not even America, Not even Russia or Israel. Nobody.Why to bring abhinandan on TV when IAF chief is confirming he is his senior.
I can show tons of more satellite images which shows target is hit.
And india have a global image of having a PROFESSIONAL ARMY globally. We do exercice with almost all major powers. If india is claiming something it will not be a joke. And all major powers already know what happened.
What was the last time Russia US or Chinese Israel released images from there satellite showing there top secret capabilities?
What were our objectives. 1st to show Pakistan if you run policy to bleed india with thousand cuts we can also make cost for you high.
Removed article 370 besides some randi rona Pakistan have failed to do anything.
Pakistani can believe anything which you like such as 98% of Pakistan public see osama biladen as a hero does this effect the world no.
You can believe you won siachin war. You can believe you won 1965 (what were the gains operation gland slam failed pathetically.)
And in last 1971when you gifted half of the nation to Muslim brothers.
Wars are won on ground not on social media.
While everyone agree with Pakistan that it didnot lost a F-16 JET
Why IAF allowed Female ground controller to come on TV and give out her version? Why not NANDU ? Remember, she was the one shouting flow cold nandu flow cold.
Simply IAF is afraid Abhinandan will spill the beans on TV. Hence not allowing him to come on tv.