- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 31,122
- Likes
- 41,041
The cockpit and instrument, More will come in next many prototypes ..
Whatever people say to bash PC-7 but it is being used by countless AF and there has been zero major malfunction/ accident so far since their induction in IAF. IAF is extremely happy with its performance and availability rates. Let's not forget that HTT-32 was awfully inappropriate, obsolete and unsafe for pilot training. HAL couldn't figure out how to fix its fuel cutoff glitch which had caused several crashes. If anything, India had to request Pilatus to expedite PC-7 deliveries since HTT-32 were grounded after a crash killing two experienced pilots. I don't know since when we all started dancing to HAL's tunes - a pathetic monopoly DSPU with dismal record for quality and efficiency.
Only time can tell how safe and effective HHT-40 is for rookie pilots. After all, the aim of air-force is to defend the nation and not glorify DSPUs. Anyway...
The decision of GOI to not to extend the maintenance contract is debatable because most customers nowadays want 10 years of maintenance built in the initial contract itself. Extending warranties is always very expensive. India has made the same mistake of buying inadequate aftersales support in Rafale contract with Dassault by having only 5 years of maintenance and availability guarantees. Qatar on the other hand has opted for 10 years.
The HTT-40 literally has twice the horsepower of the PC-7. Like the PC-21 it can be used as a replacement for intermediate jet trainers. PC-7 is for learning flight basics. Good news is HAL has a bunch of experience from the HPT-32 so those design flaws were taken care of in the initial phases. HTT-40 is fine for basic training flights but it will be interesting to see if her flight envelop can replace the need for intermediate jet trainers and save IAF millions in cost per flight hour. Basic flight training can be done from simulators, you need a turboprop with some horsepower to transition into jets, just chugging along with low powered props doesn't get the job done.Whatever people say to bash PC-7 but it is being used by countless AF and there has been zero major malfunction/ accident so far since their induction in IAF. IAF is extremely happy with its performance and availability rates. Let's not forget that HTT-32 was awfully inappropriate, obsolete and unsafe for pilot training. HAL couldn't figure out how to fix its fuel cutoff glitch which had caused several crashes. If anything, India had to request Pilatus to expedite PC-7 deliveries since HTT-32 were grounded after a crash killing two experienced pilots. I don't know since when we all started dancing to HAL's tunes - a pathetic monopoly DSPU with dismal record for quality and efficiency.
Only time can tell how safe and effective HHT-40 is for rookie pilots. After all, the aim of air-force is to defend the nation and not glorify DSPUs. Anyway...
The decision of GOI to not to extend the maintenance contract is debatable because most customers nowadays want 10 years of maintenance built in the initial contract itself. Extending warranties is always very expensive. India has made the same mistake of buying inadequate aftersales support in Rafale contract with Dassault by having only 5 years of maintenance and availability guarantees. Qatar on the other hand has opted for 10 years.
Why we need parachute for such low speed plane.HTT-40 has been fitted and flown with a parachute gantry. Actual stall/spin testing to commence shortly.
the answer is in the quote .................................................Why we need parachute for such low speed plane.
flown with a parachute gantry. Actual stall/spin testing to commence shortly.
Parrikar initially cleared the order of 38 more PC7s, but neither they were finally contracted, nor did we extended the maintenance contract for the first 75. The CBI investigations are on going.Wonder why BJP has not done anything about this yet.
Not financially since the helicopter, trainer and LCA orders are firm. But they have to adjust to the political shift of the NDA government, that at least appears to favour private Indian industry, so HAL needs to be more competitive for the future. Outsourcing production part is one of the obvious goals, selling shares of the company (around 10%) to be less dependent on government funding, is another one and there are long term goals to expand in other areas of the aviation field as well.Is there some kind of financial trouble brewing at HAL?