- Joined
- Dec 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,811
- Likes
- 6,734
Pictures or it never happend... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,
The landing gear is not meant to be retractable. Retractable landing gear will increase the weight on the rotorcraft, a big no-no for a helciopter desperately trying to shed weight to meet the Air Force's (considerably eased) requirements. The additional weight of associated motors and machinery marginally 'outweighs' (quite literally) the weight of fixed, tricycle-type landing gear. The slow speed of the helicopter, on the other hand, (relative to aircraft) [top speed, estimated at 25kmph above the top-speed of the Dhruv] precluded necessitating its inclusion. The helicopter was a good 300-350 kgs. overweight compared to the Force's original ASQ, and prior to TD-1, its previous testbed designate, was a good 150-175 kgs. over the Air Force's amended (370 vis-à-vis 225 k.g.) weight requirement. Weight issues were supposed to have been mitigated to a limited extent with TD-1, but I don't know how and by how much.it seems to be lacking the killer looks, where is the retractable landing gear, the tail rotor is in open configuration, it should have been enclosed. The mock up looked much better. May be it will evolve, but retractable landing gear should have been in the initial configuration..
hahhah Gud Answer! Above all the design in the picture is just an initial mock up! The Final version will be fiercer!!It's made for the battlefield, not beauty pageants.
Guys I wanted to share my thoughts about the design of LCH. From the scaled down model image shown above, it seems to me that the landing gear is too small to support a hard/rough landing even though they claim it can withstand a hard landing. Besides the wheels seems to be very small compared to the entire size of the helicopter. Moreover, it seems that the heli have a very small ground clearance. I may be wrong in my analysis but then again its just my view. Would be awesome if somebody could explain why is so. thanks.That's because it's a wooden mockup (Aero India 07). The real thing looks like this
Here's what Col. Shukla has to say about itGuys I wanted to share my thoughts about the design of LCH. From the scaled down model image shown above, it seems to me that the landing gear is too small to support a hard/rough landing even though they claim it can withstand a hard landing. Besides the wheels seems to be very small compared to the entire size of the helicopter. Moreover, it seems that the heli have a very small ground clearance. I may be wrong in my analysis but then again its just my view. Would be awesome if somebody could explain why is so. thanks.
It has a crash-resistance capability of 10.5 m/sec, which the IAF considers absolutely necessary. I agree with them.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
HAL IJT 'Sitara' : News , Updates & Discussions. | Indian Air Force | 0 | ||
HAL's 'HLFT-42' Fighter Trainer Jet Project | Indian Air Force | 30 | ||
Hal hf 24 marut modelling thread | Members Corner | 66 | ||
HAL Tejas Mk1A VS Chengdu J10 A/B/C BVR-WVR combat scenario. | Defence & Strategy | 10 |