Bhadra
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2011
- Messages
- 11,991
- Likes
- 23,756
Sir, I appreciate your concern.Sir lch doesn't have atgms ......I know atgm is a must for an attck helicopter......
But is atgm necessary for each and every mission........
If Chetak,cheeta and cheetal will do the task then why unarmed Apache s are flying there in leh ladakh......
I am not a knowledgeable guy so.... sorry
We all know that ...mod will sign the deal before December. ......
Don't say that if lch will have atgm ...then only we will buy ..that's not the reason.....
Army wants LCH for a mission. If LCH is not capable of doing that why should anyone order it.
LCH can perform thousand other missions but those are IAF specific like anti uav or anto hepter missions, target acquisition and engagements. SAR , SAD and many other missions. LCH with Misreal and rockets is a potent platform for IAF but not for army..
In Ladakh, the army can use unarmed LCH only as Air OP but why should they do so when existing Cheetals can do It or even Dhruva / Rudra can do it. The bombing of targets is more effective with observed artillery than unguided inaccurate rocket which is only 74 mm delivering less shit with more expenses and risk... For army the utility of LCH basically lies in ATGM or an air platforms capability to control ground-launched ATGM through means like Longbow radars. LAC has none..
Why are you guys forcing thing which was conceived for Ladakh to be specific but stands sabotaged by someone you know who ?? Put Spike ER and give it to Army in numbers... who the hell is DRDO to have a say in this.. ??
Yes, sabotage is in actions and consequences and not a mere allegation. Unfortunate IA has suffered this deliberate sabotage too many times..