Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings

Swesh

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Messages
3,520
Likes
12,180
The faulty gene may be inherited from a parent, or a change to the gene (mutation) may occur at an early stage of the child's development in the womb. It's not known what causes the remaining 60 per cent of retinoblastoma cases. In these cases, there's no faulty gene and only one eye is affected (unilateral).
https://www.nidirect.gov.uk › retino...
Retinoblastoma (eye cancer in children) | nidire


ct
It's a deaseas that's has most probable reason is inbreeding causing low pool of genes
 

Azaad

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2022
Messages
7,236
Likes
27,011
Country flag
The faulty gene may be inherited from a parent, or a change to the gene (mutation) may occur at an early stage of the child's development in the womb. It's not known what causes the remaining 60 per cent of retinoblastoma cases. In these cases, there's no faulty gene and only one eye is affected (unilateral).
https://www.nidirect.gov.uk › retino...
Retinoblastoma (eye cancer in children) | nidire


ct
Type IX families are from Pakistan, Senegal, and the Irish Traveller’s ethnic group and type XI derives from 5 consanguineous families from northern Turkey.
Inbred families often illuminate rare single-gene diseases because parents share mutations inherited from their shared ancestors. The mutations are extremely rare in the outbred population in the area.


call me a neem hakim but the root cause of all problems in Paxtan from economy to internal stability to health is cousin marriage.

ab toh apni behenon ko akele chodo bc.
 

FalconSlayers

धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
27,652
Likes
191,302
Country flag
Delusional pakwits in reddit can't accept the reality that they are just cheap convenient punching bags with a mouth.
What's hilarious is that all of them believe Indians are getting thrashed in Kashmir the same way by their Chudahideen coz their media tells them so. Their lumber 1 after ruining and looting their entire country had one job to do, that was to defend the Pak sarzameen, they've failed at that too. They've also completely forgotten about the Peshawar masjid attack in which more than a 100 were killed just this year, among the hundreds of other terror attacks which is "just another day" over there.
 

justaguy

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2023
Messages
370
Likes
1,520
Country flag
What's hilarious is that all of them believe Indians are getting thrashed in Kashmir the same way by their Chudahideen coz their media tells them so. Their lumber 1 after ruining and looting their entire country had one job to do, that was to defend the Pak sarzameen, they've failed at that too. They've also completely forgotten about the Peshawar masjid attack in which more than a 100 were killed just this year, among the hundreds of other terror attacks which is "just another day" over there.
Was Pak always under the military control from beginning? Jinnah was more powerful or their generals in in 1950s?
 

FalconSlayers

धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
27,652
Likes
191,302
Country flag
Was Pak always under the military control from beginning? Jinnah was more powerful or their generals in in 1950s?
Jernails were powerful from day 1. Now they control the entire politics, economy, businesses, diplomacy and finances of the state. Pretty much why nothing much comes out of that craphole since if a jungjoo jernail with dual citizenship is leading your nation, his priority would be getting tanks, artillery, fighter jets, submarines, rifles etc. on top of his luxury penthouse in Dubai and apartment in New York with corruption money to be accumulated in his tenure instead of getting shit done for your nation.
 

MuffleParch

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2023
Messages
1,060
Likes
6,621
Country flag
Was Pak always under the military control from beginning? Jinnah was more powerful or their generals in in 1950s?
Jinnah was sidelined by the Generals even when he was alive. The dilapidated ambulance carrying then dying Jinnah got stranded on the highway. The establishment didn't even bother to send a replacement for several hours. They refused to send a helicopter. Also, there is a strong possibility they murdered Jinna's wife.

Jinnah even said the following after realizing how dictatorial the Pakistan army was becoming:
“Do not forget that the armed forces are the servants of the people. You do not make national policy; it is we, the civilians, who decide these issues and it is your duty to carry out these tasks with which you are entrusted.”
 

Swesh

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Messages
3,520
Likes
12,180

WASHINGTON: Eleven members of the US Congress, in a letter to US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, have urged the Biden administration to withhold future US assistance to Pakistan, until the country restores constitutional order and holds free and fair elections.

The lawmakers requested a legal determination from the Department of State under the Leahy Laws and Section 502(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act to assess if US-origin security assistance had facilitated human rights violations in Pakistan.

“We further request that future security assistance be withheld until Pakistan has moved decisively toward the restoration of Constitutional order, including by holding free and fair elections in which all parties are able to participate freely,” they wrote.





The country’s moves to further strengthen the blasphemy law also figured prominently in the letter, which warned Secretary Blinken that the proposed changes would be used to further tighten the noose around smaller religious groups and minorities.

Nearly dozen Congress members, including Ilhan Omar, seek restoration of Constitutional order, rollback of blasphemy law changes

“We are extremely concerned about the passing of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2023 which will strengthen the existing blasphemy law, which has historically been used to persecute religious minorities,” the lawmakers wrote.

They pointed out that the bill, which is yet to be signed by the president, was “passed in haste despite repeated calls from many lawmakers for a thorough parliamentary procedure.”

The letter also pointed out that on Aug. 16, eight days after the bill was passed, a mob desecrated churches and set fire to homes of Christians in Jaranwala. It also referred to reported protests against the bill, including by the Shia community in Gilgit-Baltistan.

“Religious persecution remains rampant in Pakistan, and we are concerned about future restrictions on freedom of religion and belief should this Bill become law,” the lawmakers warned.

The move was initiated by Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, who is one of the champions of Muslim causes in the US Congress. Other signatories include Frank Pallone Jr, Joaquin Castro, Summer Lee, Ted W. Lieu, Dina Titus, Lloyd Doggett and Cori Bush.

Most of them are members of the progressive group within Congress, which played a key role in highlighting the Palestinian issue in Washington and also participates in protest meetings and rallies held to demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.

In its latest report on Pakistan, the US Commission on International Religious Freedom noted that “religious minorities were especially vulnerable to prosecution or violence based on blasphemy allegations” and “blasphemy cases remained a substantial threat to religious freedom.”

The report also noted that the previous government in Pakistan had “weaponised the country’s blasphemy laws against former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his cabinet members”.

While acknowledging Pakistan’s significance as a long-standing ally, the lawmakers also stressed the need to address issues like restrictions on freedom of expression, speech, and religion, enforced disappearances, military courts and the harassment and arrest of political opponents and human rights defenders.

Addressing ongoing harassment and arrests, the lawmakers mentioned the cases against PTI chief Imran Khan as well, noting that he could potentially face the death penalty for allegedly violating the Official Secrets Act.

The letter also mentioned Imaan Mazari, a human rights lawyer, who was taken from her home at 3am without an arrest warrant after speaking at a rally against enforced disappearances.

The letter urged the US Embassy in Islamabad to send observers to hearings and other legal proceedings of human rights defenders and political dissidents, including for emblematic cases such as Ms Mazari, Khadija Shah and Mr Khan.

“We believe that the United States can play a constructive role in supporting positive change, and it is our hope that our cooperation can contribute to a more just and equitable future for the people of Pakistan,” the lawmakers wrote.

They also offered to work with Secretary Blinken to promote human rights, democracy, and stability in Pakistan.

However, it remains unclear how the US government, particularly the Department of State, will respond to these concerns and whether it will impact the dynamics of the US-Pakistan relationship.

In Washington, the focus on human rights violations underscores the delicate balance between geopolitical alliances and the promotion of democratic values on the global stage. The State Department has been markedly careful while commenting on the current political situation in Pakistan.

The issue has been raised regularly at the State Department’s daily briefings, where the spokesperson has carefully avoided making statements that could be interpreted as an expression of support for either the government or the opposition.

Published in Dawn, November 19th, 2023
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,069
Likes
148,761
Country flag
Was Pak always under the military control from beginning? Jinnah was more powerful or their generals in in 1950s?
Jinnah was alive for only a year after their separation from India, first failed coup happens in 51, officially the first successful coup happens in 58 by ayub khan.

in between pakistan was a mess, everyone was fighting(politically) with each other. muslim league's clout was waning, when coup did happen in 58, it is said awam did not object since there were riots and strikes preceding it.

military did not start as predominant power, they consolidated later.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

Articles

Top