porky_kicker
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2016
- Messages
- 6,030
- Likes
- 44,621
Obviously it's a variantSo it's a variant of helina or totally different ?
Obviously it's a variantSo it's a variant of helina or totally different ?
Highly possible , inorder to circumvent American listening stations in Thailand facing indian test sites.I believe we would see this assembly soon enough in FTR.
And the chinese .Highly possible , inorder to circumvent American listening stations in Thailand facing indian test sites.
This looks like DRDO's own demo video... So do we assume the info here to be correct?I don't understand why people are confusing themselves . They are simply repeating what the presstitudes are wrongly publishing without checking the original sources. Never trust MSM.
Dhruvastra is not renamed Helina . Nor is Dhruvastra the name of the launcher .
DRDO published brochure
View attachment 53933
Helina is the army version
And
Dhruvastra is the airforce variant of Helina
And the physical difference can be seen here
View attachment 53934
I am not aware of the software differences or differences in term of capabilities . Will have to wait for drdo to provide information on that.
Quad launcher for bharmos or helina ? If helina @Steven Rogers posted something about it on page 214 . If I remembered properly .is quad launcher under development? @patriots
No official confirmation...but last chatter was a quad luncher is being designed.....is quad launcher under development? @patriots
That's an old video AFAIK , livefist sliced it together to make a new video lol.This looks like DRDO's own demo video... So do we assume the info here to be correct?
You know how old this video is?.. Some impressive precision displayed here hitting such tiny target.That's an old video AFAIK , livefist sliced it together to make a new video lol.
Possible things might have changed. Who knows . Let's see .
Sir ji leave.....don't get personal please...you all are knowledgeable ....but please maintain your dignity...all have different opinions.You have been caught ....
I think the next logical step to delay the project is to ask them to increase the speed preferably make it supersonic, may be just increase the speed of playback?You know how old this video is?.. Some impressive precision displayed here hitting such tiny target.
To me it looked like someone has added the voice which was not present in the demo video, However I did not see anything to the contrary to what DRDO has claimed. Isn't this is what we knew all along?This looks like DRDO's own demo video... So do we assume the info here to be correct?
Neither. This is not 1980.Tell me which is the bettr way to defend ..
-Tanks are at border and start engaging enemy tanks when those are four km inside their area and then keep falling back.
- Tanks stand four km behind the border and satrt engaging tanks when they appraoch the border line...
And Bhoop Singh is not canon fodder. He is the only hero of the Lord Vishnu's Vasundahara. He fires 84 mm RL to cover move of BMP / Tank in the face of enemy as also covers BMP's ass when it is not able to fire a missiles due to minimum range.. Do you know that 84mm RL HEAT also has minimum range..
That's why I asked. I hadn't seen this before. The graphics looked like a Defexpo video but the voice-over didn't seem original.To me it looked like someone has added the voice which was not present in the demo video, However I did not see anything to the contrary to what DRDO has claimed. Isn't this is what we knew all along?
HELINA :- 8 km max range in LOAL
SANT :- 20 km max range with MMW seeker
4 side thruster design in heline has long been gone...This looks like DRDO's own demo video... So do we assume the info here to be correct?
maybe, drdo adopted the jet vane to the nag design to totally undo the side thruster..probably in mpatgm they validated this design.dhruvastra has been santioned by mod just after successfull lunch of mpatgm ..Yes
And I am assuming dhruvastra also has the same.