agentperry
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
- Messages
- 3,022
- Likes
- 690
Y u ask wen y know
Yes, DRDO failed with domestic Trishul. That is all that was said. We can go on all month about DRDO failures... what are the successes? Akash is half success since they needed Polish radar, but that is fine.
No, It didn't failed in Trishul. For radars - Check DRDO radars. we didn't bought. We were successful.Yes, DRDO failed with domestic Trishul. That is all that was said. We can go on all month about DRDO failures... what are the successes? Akash is half success since they needed Polish radar, but that is fine.
Are you crazy or something? Seriously?Yes, DRDO failed with domestic Trishul. That is all that was said. We can go on all month about DRDO failures... what are the successes? Akash is half success since they needed Polish radar, but that is fine.
Armand2REP is posting wrong info. He always does when it comes anything related with DRDO and HAL.
There is no Polish component in the Akash system. It's just a rumour. Only early models of the radar system had Polish inputs and were long replaced by a fully Indian radar years before induction.Akash is half success since they needed Polish radar, but that is fine.
We bought Barak-1 in 1997. (15 years back). JINSA Online -- Israel-India Military and Civil Trade Ties SkyrocketArmand is right. Trishul failed and hence the Navy opted for Barak.
Prasun K Sengupta says a lot of Indian made things are Israeli or something else dude...
So ? It's just personal opinion by Prasun.
One they dont use Rohini but Rajendra and two that article is BS, there is no source or proof for that. Nothing in the polish media either.
Are you saying that DRDO is a failed organisation?How long does something have to be "delayed" until it is considered a failure? At least Russia has the guts to cancel projects. DRDO, No.
dont u think it is failure if you dont deliver on time.They are not a failed organization, They always deliver but one or two decades late
How much or what is the DRDO involvment in LCA.. ?So what can be done to improve the situation? Those who criticize should also give remedies.
The following are failures by any standards.
1) Kaveri= Failure
2)LCA= Partial Failure(no advancement in avionics like radar or engine and many other stuff we know about)
3)Arjun
4)Trishul
5)UAVs we still buy from the outside
6)Guns we still buy from the outside
7)???
Anyone want to add?
You call that a successful organization?
Nope...not only on time but quality...i think i would be proud of LCA if it is world-class fighter....dont u think it is failure if you dont deliver on time.
I think in missile technology DRDO has got its place.no doubt in that..perhaps what it should do stream line resources and man power.It has got the talent but no man management..."chaltha hai " kind of attitude.This must change.Otherwise it is just waste of money.Its always been our experience that no govt organization is efficient...I would not add BMD.
I believe its good but no one acknowledges the Israeli input.
To put Akash in ships we need a displacement of 10k tons. We dont have any replacements projects going on for Baraks. Navy hasnt got any plan to put akash in ships and it never will.There is no point defending the Thrishual is a fail but the Barak is only an intermediary for an local missile to take its place.. Other missiles like the Akash and Shurya will take its place. The problem is the Ships where fitted with silos made for Barak.