These are not adequate. We need proper blast proof doors separating crew from stowage.
Hull ammo stowage on Arjun is the same, containerized. But encased within a fuel tank, like what the British do. Again an unreliable and inadequate choice.
We need an autoloader in the bustle, period. Oh, and we most definitely need non-sensitive propellant charges, like the Germans.
I know, that's why I put forth that question to him. Although, I'd say it's still a marginally better configuration than that of 99% of the current generation MBTs.
So tank should have built according to your personal choice rather than Army requirements?? Show me when did army gave requirements of what you are talking about??
1. Not anymore. The Brits are going for smoothbore in a fleet wide retrofit.
1) so Chalanger was never a inferior tank due to its riffled gun then why Arjun is inferior??
1) so Chalanger was never a inferior tank due to its riffled gun then why Arjun is inferior??
2) Abraham weight equal to Arjun but why only Arjun is overweight??
3) T-90 is a death trap??
The only tank which is winning war and proved it's metal in real battle is Death trap?? Did Russian ministry told this over phone??
Despite of half advance as Arjun, T-90 is a world best tank proven on battle field.
4) When Western tank failed in Ukraine it's a different scenario but Arjun faile in special terrain then it's failure. Why so hippocrisy bro?
5) But still none survived, this could also mean that there are limitations for all machine that doesn't necessarily means they are inferior.
If Army missed then it's not mistake its requirement which you don't want to accept because your love with wonderwaffe. Every army work according to its budget you can't have fancy toys every next day.
So Arjun is not inferior or superior. It is what it was asked by Indian army Generals.
Western tanks failed in ookraina because of low numbers.1) so Chalanger was never a inferior tank due to its riffled gun then why Arjun is inferior??
2) Abraham weight equal to Arjun but why only Arjun is overweight??
3) T-90 is a death trap??
The only tank which is winning war and proved it's metal in real battle is Death trap?? Did Russian ministry told this over phone??
Despite of half advance as Arjun, T-90 is a world best tank proven on battle field.
4) When Western tank failed in Ukraine it's a different scenario but Arjun faile in special terrain then it's failure. Why so hippocrisy bro?
5) But still none survived, this could also mean that there are limitations for all machine that doesn't necessarily means they are inferior.
If Army missed then it's not mistake its requirement which you don't want to accept because your love with wonderwaffe. Every army work according to its budget you can't have fancy toys every next day.
So Arjun is not inferior or superior. It is what it was asked by Indian army Generals.
I know how painful it is to shad off their love to wonderwaffe. You are not alone.
T90M, not T90, which has the important improvement of moving loose ammo into bustle. Else carrying greater than 22 rounds is death sentence.
bruv t90m is a great tonk tbh get a aps on it would make it one of the best tank in the world its survivability is okay its darn cheap 4.5 million a piece while the m10 booker is 13 million a piece so we get 3 t90m for an m10 while M1A2 SEP v3 costs 9-10 million so you get 2 t90m for it too apart its reverse speed t90m is a formidable equipment in sheer numbers
Imo its an exceptional improvement over T90, especially since you can do it as an upgrade package. Easily beats most western tanks.
the unit targeted was CUAS low level flying radar, jammer component was absent
MGS version of Stryker is 20 ton. Battle weight would be around 24 ton.
Does stryker have water wading capability as whap?
i think the lifting capasity of c 130 is 19.8 tonnes so striker can be airlifted too from it while baseline whap cant be
NO.
Yeah. That's an issue too.
Weight is exactly why the M1128 MGS failed. With the 105mm autoloaded gun turret it reached the max load bearing capacity of the chassis. Hence they couldn't fit additional armor on it. The autoloader takes up too much dead space and the gun has limited traverse angles and even more limited firing angles. Limited space inside also meant that the cooling system was inadequate and it was a sauna inside during ops. A 105mm mobile gun attracts too much attention, and this thing has fuckall armor, unreliable autoloader and limited firing capabilities. I suspect the WhAP will go through similar issues if a 105mm autoloaded gun turret is selected. There won't be any capacity left to give them frontal protection against 30mm autocannons at the least.
Can't say exactly but depending upon the turret around 30 tons.
