standard snowball
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2022
- Messages
- 228
- Likes
- 627
You are comparing these missiles on the basis of technology, I am comparing on the basis of use cases.SPYDER also use VLS like CAMM. Spyder systems uses multiple missiles. Spyder, nasmas, caam etc comes under same category, aams converted into or developed inti sams, like astra vl aka vl sr sam, like sea sparrow missile
both are around 50km range. reaction time unknown, purpose same, lies in between sr sam and lr sam
NASMAS is similar to Spyder without python & CAMM er. Chu SAM is similar to barak lr, NASAMS 2 with range around 50km, active RF seeker, VLS and comparable to akash ng
No point arguing.
Akash NG's launcher is slanted and can be used in a similar fashion to QRSAM, where as Chu SAM uses a VLS which would need to erected thus using up crucial time.
Chu SAM is best suited for defending military bases where it is already in erected position.
If you want to compare it do so with Barak 8 or Spyder MR.