- Joined
- Aug 3, 2010
- Messages
- 4,654
- Likes
- 8,370
You sure? How do you know?It's an older prototype of MCIWS.
You sure? How do you know?It's an older prototype of MCIWS.
Its an older pic. The new one is like you postedYou sure? How do you know?
Its an older pic. The new one is like you posted
It seems like a newer prototype.It's an older prototype of MCIWS.
What do you think is the current status of the MCIWS?It seems like a newer prototype.
From June 2015:-
MoS for Defence Rao Inderjit Singh examining the gun. Good thing they got rid of 45 degree AK style gas port.
Hmm....this one seems to be having a longer gas tube,a long stroke piston in this one??It seems like a newer prototype.
From June 2015:-
MoS for Defence Rao Inderjit Singh examining the gun. Good thing they got rid of 45 degree AK style gas port.
Hmm....this one seems to be having a longer gas tube,a long stroke piston in this one??
It seems like a newer prototype.
From June 2015:-
MoS for Defence Rao Inderjit Singh examining the gun. Good thing they got rid of 45 degree AK style gas port.
Looks like they replaced the non-adjustable gas block with an adjustable one, like in INSAS. A gas regulator is needed if the gas block has to be adjusted when switching from one calibre to another.View attachment 5747
it can also be that the gas tube is exposed when the foregrip along with it's rails are removed. The one held by minister does not have foregrip.
The barrel and flash suppressor are also different from INSAS now. They do need to cut down the rifle length, it's only marginally smaller than INSAS with a collapsed butt (905 mm). With an extended butt (980 mm), it's even longer than INSAS.Looks like they replaced the non-adjustable gas block with an adjustable one, like in INSAS. A gas regulator is needed if the gas block has to be adjusted when switching from one calibre to another.
I think production depends on army, pretty sure army will take atleast 1.5 year to test and submit report.From when this rifle will enter into mass production?
and big in size, lengthy too,
the gun looks pretty heavy.
do we know the weight of the gun in picture
M4 is not multicaliber.and big in size, lengthy too,
it should be like m4.
There are plenty of uppers available for m-4/m-16 family to convert them into 7.62x39, 6.5 mm, 6.8 mm, .300 blk guns using the standard lower and appropriate magazines. There are even a few universal magazines whixh can accommodate all these round. Colt CM-901 is multicaliber, basically a with special lower which can mate with M-4/M-16/AR-15/AR-10 uppers, can also fire 7.62x51 mm rounds.M4 is not multicaliber.
It looks like neither.It is not very clear, but I have a feeling the old MCIWS flash suppressor looks like that of INSAS and the new MCIWS flash suppressor looks like that of the Excalibur.
View attachment 5754
Adapted from original picture by @Kunal Biswas:
http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/...pictures-from-kunal-biswas.58405/#post-855982
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/853/40yf.jpg
I wasn't talking about these pictures. I was talking about the other picture with the MCIWS in the hands of Rao Inderjit Singh.It looks like neither.
That image is not clear enough, but looking at the gas tubes in these two pics, it can be said they are the same new rifle that the minister is holding, compared to the old ones.I wasn't talking about these pictures. I was talking about the other picture with the MCIWS in the hands of Rao Inderjit Singh.
The gun in the two pictures quoted above has a flash suppressor like the regular INSAS.