Defexpo India 2016

[Immanuel]

Polaris seems to have a great vehicle, I believe its ideal for all our SF units, a perfect Gypsy replacement

http://www.polarisind.in/government-military-vehicles/RZR-SW

More so, the upcoming Chinook can easily carry two of these with 9 men each, thats 2 Squads of SF units that can be rapidly deployed. It can also easily be slung load under the S-70/UH-60 pretty cool.

 

[Navnit Kundu]

Arjun as it is now can run into any western army with 1000s of confirmed orders.

See ,the carrot of confirmed order of 100 tejas mk1 A put HAL into overdrive with ASEA radar, refueling probe, quartz radome etc, etc,
production orgs have to justify the money spent on production line & continued innovation with concrete orders,

I guess, apart from the engine, everything in the Arjun MK2 is indigenous?

 

[shiphone]

It's a defense expo where various countries are showcasing their own products. If Armata is better than other tanks so should we bar other tanks from participating? if a country introduces a supersonic jet then should we remove all non-supersonic aircraft families like helicopters?

it'so funny to read such remarkable Logic here...I do appreciate your ability/willing to harangue...but what's wrong with you? ....LOL...

have you seen the images of T-14 as I suggested?
---------------------
1...it's a CG work as your compatriot said, and it's much closer to (based on) the Armata than your favorite ----T-90MS....the feature is so typical and the Rendering is so unreal that I can't believe you couldn't tell... lol

-----------------------
2...did you notice the secondary weapon (30mm MG or XXmm GL). the so called 'Ammunition rest deep in the belly ' is not for the RCWS on this so called CAD design...LOL...

again...this is trying to explain one of possibilities of the T-14/Armata turret layout。。。

3... the RCWS on your favorite T-90MS... what your said above is totally none sense/baloney...

 

[sayareakd]

Welcome mate, Long time since you posted, So you have come back with big gift bag for all of us!!!

yeah its long time, now a days work load and lots of friends on Whatsup, send me your number and i will add you to group (group has entry by invitation only), its fast to chat on whatsup application.

 

[Navnit Kundu]

it'so funny to read such remarkable Logic here...I do appreciate your ability/willing to harangue...but what's wrong with you? ....LOL...

have you seen the images of T-14 as I suggested?
---------------------
1...it's a CG work as your compatriot said, and it's much closer to (based on) the Armata than your favorite ----T-90MS....the feature is so typical and the Rendering is so unreal that I can't believe you couldn't tell... lol

-----------------------
2...did you notice the secondary weapon (30mm MG or XXmm GL). the so called 'Ammunition rest deep in the belly ' is not for the RCWS on this so called CAD design...LOL...

again...this is trying to explain one of possibilities of the T-14/Armata turret layout。。。

3... the RCWS on your favorite T-90MS... what your said above is totally none sense/baloney...

You took screenshots of my post but did you conveniently missed the video of a T90S tank live fire exercise? Go back and watch both the videos and save yourself the embarrassment.

http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/defexpo-india-2016.76037/page-8#post-1151246

 

[shiphone]

LOL....hopeless and shameless chicanery... but it doesn't work, we are talking about the
fact...if you want the screenshot of so called lifesaver video, then you got it...

don't humiliate this forum and yourself any more...

-------------------
is this your word?

"No fanboy art sirjee, the same is consistently visible in their production version tanks (newer T90 MS not T90). They have redesigned the gun such that the bullets rest deep in the belly and the bullet feeder module is separate from the gun barrel, so whenever you swivel the barrel, the entire assembly need not move along with it. Just the barrel moves but the bullets remain in place. This makes the barrel light weight and agile. Check this CAD design :"

 

[abingdonboy]

No need to set a time line for a superfluous requirement, with FGFA coming around , a second production line for tejas, along with a proposal to build another private sector production line for fighters, We can afford to wait for ever for rafale, to get a correct price & terms.

That's nonsense. The FGFA won't be in service for another decade at least and neither it nor the LC take care of the MMRCA requirement- the FGFA is too large, expensive and ill suited to strike missions and the LCA was never meant to be used for that and has too limited a range and sensor suite. The news about a second fighter line is the DM's attempt at playing tough but none of the options (SAAB, LM or Boeing) are attractive in the slightest.

 

[Illusive]

.

 

[SajeevJino]

The flight are co ordinates both Russia and US shares flight path in real time to avoid a stupid shot.
Jammer a lot of them with planes flying low coming with 100 km to launch stand off weapons ,any thinging else is suicide .It is in the assumption there is no air cover .If there is air cover ,then it is a massacre.

I couldn't get, are you saying flying inside the SAM umbrella is a suicide mission ..na i don't think that, fighters are more evolved to spoof off those Frequencies

 

[SajeevJino]

I'd rather the GoI went for some C-17s out of the USAF's inventory or down the road the A400M, I don't want anymore Russian dependance in the Indian armed forces.

well Airforce had enough of strategic lifters, what they now want is Tactical multi rolers like C 130 and C 295. who are in orders

there is no option of A 400 in IAF service, since C 130 J doing far better job

 

[LurkerBaba]

I moved ~200 posts into http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/know-your-rafale.32861/page-140

More OT posts will invite bans

 

[Shaitan]

I moved ~200 posts into http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/know-your-rafale.32861/page-140

More OT posts will invite bans

Well....well...well... igniting bans are we now? smh

 

[Godless-Kafir]

Well....well...well... igniting bans are we now? smh

Generally 200 posts make 200 times anyone gave a fuk about this site.

 

[Sakal Gharelu Ustad]

Generally 200 posts make 200 times anyone gave a fuk about this site.

You still alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[WolfPack86]

Defexpo 2016 Pictures

 

[WolfPack86]

Defexpo 2016 Pictures

 

[WolfPack86]

Defexpo 2016 Pictures

 

[WolfPack86]

Defexpo 2016 Pictures

 

[WolfPack86]

Defexpo 2016 Pictures

 

[WolfPack86]

Defexpo 2016 Pictures