... also in times of India, sunday guardian and many other publications. He was an editor with much respected mathrubhumi daily too.
Still, he clearly lacks knwoledge and understanding of the MMRCA, let alone of the Gripen itself! He blames IAF, althought they prefered the fast and cost-effective solution initially, by simply adding more single engine Mirage 2000s, but MoD/GoI didn't agreed.
He also didn't undestand why MoD/GoI didn't do so, because the possible industrial and political outcome of adding such big players like Boeing and EADS/BAE...with all the support of their countries gives India way more chances to improve our industry and add politcal and strategic advantages, than just going with a fast solution, that might have benefitted only IAF.
Moreover, he didn't understand that India already has the light to medium class, single engine, low cost fighter with the LCA and that's this was the biggest reason to reject the Gripen, not the competition of the more capable MMRCAs alone.
Saab and Sweden would have been good co-development partners if they joined LCA, or we joint Gripen development, but today in MMRCA, the aim is for way bigger industrial benefits then they can offer, since they are as dependent on foreign partners as we are (Gripens engine and big parts of radar and avionics are foreign, just like LCAs). That's why buying a more expensive fighter (besides the operational advantages of Rafale and to some extend EF), that offers more industrial and political advantages in return is totally worth it. The only question is, which one is more worth the costs, but we already can say that Indian industry will be a winner for sure!