Chinese Navy Destroyers

Hari Sud

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
1,715
Likes
2,080
Country flag
No country has ever launched double digit destroyers in a year after ww2. It is once in a lifetime thing.

As in ?

The same can be said about british type 45, indian kolkata class and pretty much 90% naval ships on the planet.
Then again, Arleigh burke was incapacitated by a cheap boat with IED, does that make it ineffective?

That can be a dangerous assumption at best.
Battle of paracel islands, johnson reef etc go against that assumption.

BS......... you seem to be liking Chinese third rate material.
 

Hari Sud

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
1,715
Likes
2,080
Country flag
And we wont able to match even that ..so lets give credit where it is due

Here is what others think of Chinese navy. Now calm down and stop wasting money on Chinese navy and stop praising it. This is the worst fleet ever....


Naval Air: Chinese Carrier Fleet Fail

https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htnavai/articles/20191229.aspx



December 29, 2019: Earlier in 2019 it looked like China was moving forward to expand its carrier force by building four steam powered carriers followed by a larger nuclear powered class similar to the American ones. At the end of 2019 it was announced that plans had changed. There were numerous problems that contributed to the decision and it meant a smaller Chinese fleet with far fewer carriers.

The most immediate problem was the trade war with the United States. Exports to the U.S. are down 23 percent and devaluation of the yuan (the Chinese currency) mean that dollars coming from the U.S. trade is down by nearly 30 percent. Exports to other Western nations are down as well, mainly due to foreign manufacturing operations moving out of China to get away from problems that have little to do with the U.S. trade war. Those dollars are important to pay for oil, which China is the largest importer of. Their growing fleet consumes a lot of oil, but the Chinese economy needs it more. Each carrier is accompanied by up to ten support ships. Half of that is warships but the other half are for “sustainment”, carrying oil and other supplies to keep the carriers going for as long as they are at sea. All those ships burn lots of oil, imported oil.

The second problem is military technology. China expected difficulties developing and implementing all the many technologies needed to effectively operate carrier task forces. Fixing those problems is taking longer than expected. This is especially true with the carriers and aircraft that can operate from them. Most of China’s modern aircraft are illegal copies of Russian designs and efforts to implement lots of stolen American aircraft tech has not gone as smoothly as hoped. There has been a pattern of delays and problems with aircraft tech that have stalled ambitious efforts to develop carrier-based fighters and stealth aircraft. No point in building a lot of carriers is they will be limited or sidelined so often by technical problems.

The third problem is that those carriers and other large warships are meant to defend Chinese claims in the South China Sea and that is proving more expensive than anticipated. Not only do the growing number of artificial island bases have to be supplied by ship but to operate larger ships in the generally shallow South China Sea you have to dredge deeper channels to move those large ships around. This year China cancelled another major dredging operation because of cost, especially the oil needed for the dredging ships and support vessels. For now smaller warships and land-based aircraft will defend Chinese claims in the South China Sea.

There is another problem with those claims; many Chinese neighbors have increased their defense spending specifically to deal with the Chinese navy. The American naval forces in the western Pacific plus the fleets of South Korea and Japan were already a formidable naval force blocking Chinese use of gunboat diplomacy. But now many smaller nations are allied with the larger anti-Chinese nations and those smaller nations are buying lots of submarines, fighter-bombers with anti-ship missiles as well as shore based anti-ship missiles. The Chinese plan to build more warships and intimidate neighbors into submission backfired. The many threatened neighbors united and joined an arms race China cannot afford.


A fourth problem is demographic. Several decades of the “one-child” per couple policy did prevent a population explosion. It also helped create the first large (several hundred million strong) Chinese middle class of well-educated engineers and other professionals. These are the people who were key to China quickly creating the second largest GDP in the world. But there is a catch. Affluent, talented women everywhere, and throughout history, don’t have a lot of children. Even though the one-child rule was revoked several years ago, the population is not growing, especially with the educated couples. Worse the children of middle-class families are not eager to join the military, which needs their skills to operate all this new gear. China has conscription but it is not enforced because it is unpopular, especially among the educated. Those carriers, and all their support ships, need lots of capable officers and someone did the math and realized the ships could be built faster than competent crews could be found. The military in general has had a hard time getting capable young men to do all the tech jobs the army and air force, as well as the navy now have. Given the shrinking work force, because of the one-child rule, that situation is not going to improve for a decade or more.

In light of all those problems the Chinese decision to halt the carrier force expansion is less of a surprise. Actually the decision has been percolating just below the surface for some time. There were always national leaders, and their specialist advisors, who were bringing up these difficulties whenever the admirals asked for more. More naval power is fine but only if you can solve all the technical problems, assemble the necessary expertise and recruit enough personnel to crew all those ships.

Chinese state-controlled mass media prevents public discussion of these matters. As a result changes in policy, especially military policy, appear sudden when, in fact, they are not. For example in mid-2019 Chinese and foreign media were amazed at the continued growth of the Chinese navy. For example, earlier in the year commercial satellite photos have revealed to Western media what appeared to be a new addition to the Jiangnan shipyard on the Yangtze River near Shanghai. The new yard gave the impression that it was devoted to building aircraft carriers. A new carrier, apparently the first 70,000 ton Type 002, was under construction. More revealing was the extensive infrastructure being erected around the new dry-dock and nearby kilometer long fitting out pier. This is something of a mass production operation with components of the hull and pre-fabricated sections of the hull interior stored nearby to be lifted into place and attached to the hull and other sections. This is a technique widely used in commercial shipbuilding and for other Chinese warships, including the new 12,000 ton Type 55 destroyers and 40,000 ton Type 075 LPH amphibious ship.


The new “carrier yard” could be used for building smaller ships but it was essential for turning out carriers quickly. The Type 002 carrier uses catapults to launch aircraft. The hull of the first one, already underway, is apparently going to take less than two years to finish and launch. After that, it moves to the fitting out pier where another two or three years of work is needed before the new carrier ready for sea trials. That process, including trips back to port or the shipyard for fixes and adjustments, can take a year or so. Or longer. Earlier Chinese carrier development included mentions of “persistent technical problems.”

China has not revealed how many carriers it plans to build eventually. China already has two; CV-16 in service and a similar CV-17 (the Shandong) recently completed trials, was commissioned on December 19th and was seen passing near Taiwan on the 26th. It was assumed that China wanted to build two more similar carriers (CV-18 and 19) which would lose the ski jump deck and instead adopt a catapult. These two will be a bit larger than CV-17 and the first one is already under construction and is expected to be in the water by 2020 and in service by 2024. One thing that might delay the Type 002 is the decision on which catapult system (steam or electric) to use. The U.S. Navy has had problems getting its EMALS (electromagnetic aircraft launch system) to work effectively and the Chinese may be waiting to see how that works out before deciding. The Type 002 will have a steam propulsion system but one that will produce a lot more electricity (for laser weapons and catapult). After the two catapult equipped carriers are evaluated, it is believed that two nuclear-powered carriers are planned (CVN-20 and 21). These will be similar to the 100,000 ton American Nimitz class CVNs. Chinese working on nuclear propulsion for submarines had long encountered lots of technical problems that has seriously limited the development of an effective Chinese nuclear submarine force. Apparently these nuclear power experts informed the government that China did not yet have reliable nuclear power plants for surface ships and it would be a while before that technology was achieved.

Since carriers spend a lot of time in port getting upgrades and maintenance, you need three or more in order to guarantee having at least two available at all times for operations. China is already preparing for that by building enough escort and support ships, along with air wings, to keep several carrier task forces (each with one carrier) busy while one or more carriers sidelined by months of maintenance and upgrades. China also recently announced that their first carrier, a rebuilt Russian carrier, would not remain a training carrier but would be equipped and manned with a crew that would enable it to also serve as a combat carrier.


It is difficult to hide carrier construction activity and it’s not just the spy satellites. Revelations about CV-17 Type 001A carrier over the last few years were not a total surprise as there had been reports that a large aircraft carrier (or parts of it) was under construction in northwest China (Dalian) since 2013. One of the best sources of information on Chinese warship construction is the Internet. Thousands of Chinese naval buffs living close to major shipyards provide a steady supply of photos on the web. The Chinese government initially tried to prevent this but soon realized that cracking down on enthusiastic and Internet-savvy Chinese fans of the navy was not a wise move. A lot of important secrets are still preserved by building parts of ships in a shed and a lot of the most valuable military secrets are with equipment installed inside the ship or behind a wall. So the government allows all (with a few exceptions) these photos to appear. The admirals, and navy personnel in general, appreciated the good publicity.

Then there are some interesting official photos. In mid-2014 photos of a carrier model being displayed at an official event appeared on the Chinese Internet. The detailed model had the hull number 18 and the ship looked similar to an American CVN (a Nimitz class nuclear aircraft carrier). The Chinese CVN has four catapults and three elevators and much other evidence of being nuclear and very similar to the Nimitz class. This was an early Chinese Navy proposal for a CVN and that has apparently been refined to something that is similar to the Nimitz.

At one point it was believed that the first Chinese CVN would be more like the American USS Enterprise (CVN 65). This was the first American nuclear-powered carrier and it served as the prototype for the subsequent Nimitz class. The Enterprise was an expensive design, and only one was built, rather than the expected class of six. While a bit longer than the later Nimitz class, it was lighter (92,000 tons displacement, versus 100,000 tons). The Enterprise was commissioned in 1961, almost 40 years after the first U.S. carrier (the Langley) entered service in 1923. CVN 65 was active until 2012 and decommissioned in early 2017, two months before the second Chinese carrier was launched. China may end up going that way before building their first nuclear carrier. A large oil fueled carrier would enable them to gain experience with a large carrier and allow designers to perfect the design of a nuclear powered large carrier.

Chinese are keen students of history, their own as well as that of others. Chinese ship designers know all about the Langley and the Enterprise. The Chinese are also well aware that in the two decades after the USS Langley there were tremendous changes in carrier aviation. While the innovation slowed after World War II, major changes continued into the 1950s (jet aircraft, nuclear-propelled carriers, SAMs). But in the ensuing half-century, there has been no major innovation in basic carrier design. This has not been a problem because the carriers have proven useful, at least for the U.S. Navy, the only fleet to use such large carriers.


No one else has maintained a force of these large carriers. Only the U.S. has felt a constant need to get air power to any corner of the planet in a hurry. More importantly, no navy has been able to give battle to the U.S. carrier force since 1945. The Soviets built new anti-carrier weapons and made plans to use them but that war never occurred. China is building carriers but does not yet seem committed to having a lot of them to confront the U.S., but rather just a few to intimidate its neighbors.

The Chinese Navy is very popular with most Chinese and its commanders are enthusiastic about expanding in order to protect the seaborne trade that the modern Chinese economy depends on. For thousands of years before that Chinese rulers did not consider naval power important because it wasn’t. Now it is and the navy is getting the money and encouragement to do what China has never done before. But at the moment Chinese tech is not up to the task of providing capable carrier aviation, especially on a large scale. The government also realized that the money required to make it all work was not really available either.

Based on what is being said in Chinese media and around the shipyard, the performance of CV-17 will play a large role. CV-17 was expected to undergo one or two years of sea trials before entering service. While the sea trials seemed ahead of schedule in early 2019, with talk of CV-17 entering service in April, that optimism was dampened when the expected “unexpected problems” showed up and required more sea trials, alternating with time in port so that items could be fixed, upgraded, repaired or replaced. Unlike CV-16, the engines of CV-17 were less of a problem.

The sea trials for China’s second aircraft carrier took 19 months, which is six months longer than their first carrier, CV-16 (Liaoning). There is no official word on why the second carrier is taking longer to debug but it was put into active service on December 19. It is known that CV-17 has more electronics, including a powerful AESA (flat panel phased array) radar and a more capable communications and control system built into the ship. It would not be surprising if those improvements caused unexpected and repeated problems. The CV-16 has made ten sea trial voyages before it entered service. CV-17 made nine. CV-17 has been in the water since April 2017, when it was launched. That was 25 months after construction began. At the end of 2017 CV-17 was dockside being prepared for sea trials, which began on schedule in May 2018.


CV-17 is a Type 001A carrier 315 meters (1,033 feet) long, which is three percent longer that CV-16. The new carrier displaces 75,000 tons, which is 12 percent more than CV-16. Obvious differences are a slightly (about 10 percent) smaller control tower and about ten percent more flight deck area. There is more space internally for maritime and aircraft fuel. It appears that CV-17 would have to be refueled about once a week when at sea.

It was only at the end of 2015 that China admitted the CV-17 existed and was referred to as Type 001A ship rather than Type 001 because it is slightly different from its predecessor. In March 2016 China revealed more details, some of them already obvious. CV-17 was considered a new design but based on the first Chinese carrier, the Liaoning. That first carrier was a 65,000 ton, 305 meter (999 feet) long ship that was itself a modified version of the last Cold War Russian carrier design. In 2016 China confirmed that CV-17 would also have the ski jump deck like Liaoning, would be somewhat heavier, and incorporate new design features that would enable it to carry more aircraft (mainly the J-15) in a larger hanger deck (just below the flight deck) as well as more fuel and aircraft weapons. Photos of CV-17 under construction revealed that it also incorporated design features that will make it more capable of surviving combat damage as well as operating more efficiently and effectively as a carrier.


In addition to the Chinese built J-15 fighter, the new carrier will also have early-warning radar and anti-submarine aircraft as well as some helicopters. CV-17 could apparently operate about 20 percent more aircraft than CV-16 (50 fixed-wing and helicopters versus about 40). Currently, China only has about fifty carrier qualified J-15 pilots and Liaoning is kept busy being what it is officially described as; a training carrier.
 

smooth manifold

Regular Member
Joined
May 14, 2019
Messages
755
Likes
493
the 14th Type 052D destroyer DDG 156 Zibo is expected to be commissioned soon.


the 13th Type 052D DDG 121 Qiqihar is still in sea trial, lagging behind the 14th 052D!
 
Last edited:

shiphone

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,918
Likes
1,908
Country flag
Is there any successor series planned for 54A frigates?
the 'successor' did exist ever before, but it seems the promising 'Type 054B' project was suspended somehow.

it was said that 054B was a brand new design with quite some new tech, so the displacement and construction cost would increase consequently.the current PLAN surface battleship classification planning has the '1500-4000-6000-12000' classifications. 054A is a cost-effective solution and workhorse in PLAN fleet (4000 tons ,barely 200-220 million cost), so such a 'successor' would put itself in the embarrassing situation. the 6000 tons, mass produced 052D destroyer is already there. it seems 054B couldn't find the place until new long term classification system is settled.

some export frigate project exhibited on some defence Expo might give some glimps , but it was the loser in the 054B Preliminary proposal bidding...

 

Bhurki

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Messages
886
Likes
741
Country flag
054A is a cost-effective solution and workhorse in PLAN fleet (4000 tons ,barely 200-220 million cost)
$350m was the minimum quoted figure confirmed by diplomat.
Any new design would be a lot closer to 052d than 054a.
054a was designed for tech at an old time like HQ16 with 40km range
Any modern MR frigate would require atleast 80-100 km of air cover like HQ9
So it is certain it'll employ Uvls, and therefore the size will be atleast 6000 tons full load..
Like this
221103fzq2zhp8b79xfcaz~2.jpeg
221104l29mi1mk8z29a36k~2.jpeg
221104lsxobyyzy4c3a9w5~2.jpeg
 

shiphone

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,918
Likes
1,908
Country flag
fanboys' guessing and CG might not be in our discussion....obviously ,the China military industry's domestic pricing system for PLA is Different from the Quotation for export projects...it's a common sense.

the law and regulation guaranteed pricing system ensure the benifits of both sides: the armed force can get enough quantities of equipments and the industry can get reasonable profit...the fact of ten destroyers lauching this year is the vivid example here.

according to the PLAN request, the price of a 12000-ton class Type 055 destroyer is pinned down to around 6 billion China Yuan(CNY), around 880 million USD.

a 6000-ton class Type 052C/D destroyer costs around 3.5-4 billion CNY , less than 600 million USD

a 4000-ton class Type 054A frigate costs around 220 million USD

a 1300-ton class Typd 056/56A corvette costs 100-105 million USD
------------
and another simple fact is the improvement of weapon system never stops. actually the new members of HQ-16 family are in service for years...the Army got the HQ-16B replacing the HQ-16A ,and Navy has the 16C varient as the replacement of the so called 'old' HQ-16(LY-80N)...it's just a matter of time for the new varient to get the export permission and licence as LY-80N(x)



further more, the new generation MR-SAM actually appeared in Type 055 destroyer's arsenal. we are very eager to lift the gauze to get a look.

 
Last edited:

ArgonPrime

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
487
Likes
613
Country flag
It is way too much praise being heaped on Chinese destroyers and other vessels under construction. These are copies of something in the West. These are yet to fire their guns in anger when somebody is firing at you with greater competence. That is unlikely to happen as Chinese are too afraid to loose with associated loss of prestige. Until then these are parade ground show pieces.
Connor McGregor once summed up this type of reaction so perfectly and I quote, "this is abject terror manifesting in a different form".
 

Shashank Nayak

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
1,370
Likes
3,567
Country flag
Connor McGregor once summed up this type of reaction so perfectly and I quote, "this is abject terror manifesting in a different form".
But, it's still an impressive launch tempo.... where is india by the way... There was a launch of 6600 ton Ins nilgiri in September
 

ladder

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
5,222
Likes
3,902
Country flag
But, it's still an impressive launch tempo.... where is india by the way... There was a launch of 6600 ton Ins nilgiri in September
INS Imphal in March/April 2019.

Together (P17A and P15B ) they make more than 10000T. But the disingenuous Chinese pie chart doesn't contain India. But it contains other countries with about 1000T.
 
Last edited:

xizhimen

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2011
Messages
650
Likes
412
China’s Giant New Warship Packs Killer Long-Range Missiles
The Chinese navy’s new guided-missile cruisers can launch land-attack cruise missiles, the Chinese navy confirmed. That capability places the Type 055 cruisers in the same class as the U.S. Navy’s own large surface combatants.

by David Axe

The Chinese navy’s new guided-missile cruisers can launch land-attack cruise missiles, the Chinese navy confirmed.

That capability places the Type 055 cruisers in the same class as the U.S. Navy’s own large surface combatants.

While experts long have suspected that the Type 055s would carry land-attack missiles, the weapons-fit remained unconfirmed until the Chinese navy announced it on social media in late December 2019.

The state-owned Global Times newspaper first reported the social-media announcement.

“Introducing the vast and complicated arsenal at its disposal, the [People’s Liberation Army] Navy said on China's Twitter-like social platform Sina Weibo that the service operates not only vessels, but also submarine-launched intercontinental ballistic missiles with strategic missile submarines and long-range land-attack cruise missiles with 10,000-ton-class guided-missile destroyer,” Global Times reported.

The Type 055 is the only 10,000-ton-displacement destroyer or cruiser in service in the Asia-Pacific region. The Chinese navy commissioned the first Type 055, Nanchang, in April 2019. Seven more Type 055s are under construction, fitting out or awaiting trials.

The Type 055 packs 112 vertical-launch missile cells plus 130-millimeter guns and space for two helicopters. Its weapons-loadout reportedly includes HHQ-9 surface-to-air missiles and YJ-18 and CJ-10 cruise missiles.

The YJ-18 has a range of around 300 miles. The CJ-10, a copy of Russia’s Kh-55, reportedly can travel as far as 800 miles. It’s unclear which of the cruise missiles the navy considers to be the land-attack weapon. It’s possible both possess land-attack capability.

With a full suite of anti-air, anti-ship and land-attack weapons, the Type-055 possesses roughly the same capabilities as an American Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, Ticonderoga-class cruiser or Zumwalt-class stealth destroyer.


The Chinese fleet reportedly intends to assign the Type 055s to its newly-forming carrier battle groups. The Chinese navy has two carriers in commission, Liaoning and Shandong. A third, larger carrier is under construction and a fourth reportedly is in the planning stage.

If the Chinese fleet follows the American model of force-generation, it could assign a single Type 055 to each carrier battle group. The cruiser would function as the air-defense commander for the group, coordinating air- and missile-defense on behalf of the carrier and other escort ships.


But the Chinese navy reportedly plans to pause carrier-construction after the fourth vessel, leaving it with at most four carrier battle groups by the late 2020s. The remaining four Type 055s that aren’t in carrier groups could function as the lead vessels in powerful surface action groups.

It’s worth noting that while China is growing its force of land-attack-capable large warships, the U.S. Navy actually has proposed to reduce its own force of similar vessels. Despite a legal requirement to grow to 350 ships, the U.S. Navy has proposed to slow ship construction and also accelerate decommissionings after 2020, potentially shrinking the front-line fleet from 290 ships in 2019 to as few as 287 in 2025.

The cuts to new production would include several of the latest Flight III Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. Four Ticonderoga-class cruisers would leave the fleet years earlier than the Navy originally planned on. The budget-driven cuts are likely to face stiff opposition in Congress, which ultimately decides the shape and size of the fleet.

Of course, the Chinese fleet doesn’t just compete with the American fleet. It also faces off against the navies of America’s Pacific allies. “Type 055 also has been compared to other warships deployed in the region, notably South Korea’s Sejong the Great class and Japan’s Atago class and its newly launched Maya subclass,” South China Morning Post reported. “Both the Sejong- and Atago-class destroyers have full displacements of around [8,500 tons] and Aegis combat systems, with the Sejong the Great class boasting a 128-cell [vertical launch system].”

“But analysts said they believe Type 055 surpasses the Korean and Japanese vessels in size, radar system performance, missile capacity and multifunctionality,” South China Morning Post claimed.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...rship-packs-killer-long-range-missiles-109786
 

ArgonPrime

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
487
Likes
613
Country flag
But, it's still an impressive launch tempo.... where is india by the way... There was a launch of 6600 ton Ins nilgiri in September
My man!! My post was in reply to his knee jerk reaction!! That poor chap appeared to have suffered an emotional meltdown. I actually agree with your line of thinking, it is indeed mighty impressing what the Chinese have managed to accomplish!! They are no longer operating shipyards but fucking hatcheries it seems!!
 

smooth manifold

Regular Member
Joined
May 14, 2019
Messages
755
Likes
493
2019 Surface vessel launch of navy by countries (Metric Tons)

I remember India also launched destroyer and frigate in 2019. The pie map is inaccurate. There's doubt if China's third Type 901 fast combat support ship was launched.
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top