- Joined
- Dec 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,811
- Likes
- 6,734
They are all domestically produced... under license.The domestically produced diesel engine
They are all domestically produced... under license.The domestically produced diesel engine
I know it's licensed. I don't think there's any engine break down records of 054A.They are all domestically produced... under license.
Of course the ships with French diesels would be the ones doing Somali pirate patrols and port calls across the globe. I don't see any of your bigger ships doing that which run on Ukrainian gas turbines.I know it's licensed. I don't think there's any engine break down records of 054A.
U mean like this?if waving a flag can achieve the effects of a costly combat, why not wave a flag?
I bet @Armand2REP means that........U mean like this?
An attempt to go to sea in November ended characteristically in disaster somewhere in the Bermuda triangle. A substantial part of a 19-ton propeller broke off, obliging the carrier to limp back to southern France.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...nch-calamity-carrier-heads-for-sea-again.html
Meanwhile,US made E2 and Catapaults C13 can only working on some French boat ...Of course the ships with French diesels would be the ones doing Somali pirate patrols and port calls across the globe. I don't see any of your bigger ships doing that which run on Ukrainian gas turbines.
On her last deployment the CdG spent 125 days at sea, traveled 66,672km, conducted 2,744 cat and traps and held exercises with Australia, Egypt, the United States, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia and Singapore. The last time your carrier went out was for a few days and had to limp back to port for extensive redesign and the project manager was fired. If you want me to list the entire combat record of CdG I can, it is more than your entire military has done in the last 40 years.U mean like this?
An attempt to go to sea in November ended characteristically in disaster somewhere in the Bermuda triangle. A substantial part of a 19-ton propeller broke off, obliging the carrier to limp back to southern France.l
are you talking about frigates or carriers? I just reputed your false claims of 054A. Liaoning is officially a training ship. It is not deployed to any fleet. 001A is in sea trials and is planned to be commissioned in 2019. so what's your point?are you trying to show us French navy has lots of experiences or what? Is it related to recent rafale deal? lol.On her last deployment the CdG spent 125 days at sea, traveled 66,672km, conducted 2,744 cat and traps and held exercises with Australia, Egypt, the United States, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia and Singapore. The last time your carrier went out was for a few days and had to limp back to port for extensive redesign and the project manager was fired. If you want me to list the entire combat record of CdG I can, it is more than your entire military has done in the last 40 years.
lol let's check out 052C.Of course the ships with French diesels would be the ones doing Somali pirate patrols and port calls across the globe. I don't see any of your bigger ships doing that which run on Ukrainian gas turbines.
Without American E2 and Catapaults C13 how many kilometter it would go or make any sense.On her last deployment the CdG spent 125 days at sea, traveled 66,672km, conducted 2,744 cat and traps and held exercises with Australia, Egypt, the United States, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia and Singapore. The last time your carrier went out was for a few days and had to limp back to port for extensive redesign and the project manager was fired. If you want me to list the entire combat record of CdG I can, it is more than your entire military has done in the last 40 years.
Lets retain the insults to the things that have happened in the past.. And not in the future. It can be dangerous sometimes..Your entire military industry can't procedure the E2 and C13 for last 40 years...
You confirmed my claims about 054A, that French engines are the most reliable in the PLAN. I am still trying to figure out why your bigger ships with Ukrainian gas turbines rarely leave home waters. You tried sending one of the newer DDGs to the Baltic in 2017 and it broke down in the Indian Ocean and had to be towed. Getting an answer to this question is paramount to determining the actual capability of a Chinese CBG. If all of your capital ships have unreliable engines then it makes your fleet a Paper Tiger.are you talking about frigates or carriers? I just reputed your false claims of 054A. Liaoning is officially a training ship. It is not deployed to any fleet. 001A is in sea trials and is planned to be commissioned in 2019. so what's your point?are you trying to show us French navy has lots of experiences or what? Is it related to recent rafale deal? lol.
Actually it was the transmission that was reported to be broken, rather than some problem with engines themselves... But, yeah, the question still remains...I am still trying to figure out why your bigger ships with Ukrainian gas turbines rarely leave home waters. You tried sending one of the newer DDGs to the Baltic in 2017 and it broke down in the Indian Ocean and had to be towed. Getting an answer to this question is paramount to determining the actual capability of a Chinese CBG. If all of your capital ships have unreliable engines then it makes your fleet a Paper Tiger.
lol should I post again?You confirmed my claims about 054A, that French engines are the most reliable in the PLAN. I am still trying to figure out why your bigger ships with Ukrainian gas turbines rarely leave home waters. You tried sending one of the newer DDGs to the Baltic in 2017 and it broke down in the Indian Ocean and had to be towed. Getting an answer to this question is paramount to determining the actual capability of a Chinese CBG. If all of your capital ships have unreliable engines then it makes your fleet a Paper Tiger.
It isn't particularly relevant since those old ships don't use the new license produced Ukrainian gas turbines.lol should I post again?
lol don't try to mix things up.You confirmed my claims about 054A, that French engines are the most reliable in the PLAN. I am still trying to figure out why your bigger ships with Ukrainian gas turbines rarely leave home waters. You tried sending one of the newer DDGs to the Baltic in 2017 and it broke down in the Indian Ocean and had to be towed. Getting an answer to this question is paramount to determining the actual capability of a Chinese CBG. If all of your capital ships have unreliable engines then it makes your fleet a Paper Tiger.
so you're just making assumptions and based your assumptions you get your conclusions.You confirmed my claims about 054A, that French engines are the most reliable in the PLAN. I am still trying to figure out why your bigger ships with Ukrainian gas turbines rarely leave home waters. You tried sending one of the newer DDGs to the Baltic in 2017 and it broke down in the Indian Ocean and had to be towed. Getting an answer to this question is paramount to determining the actual capability of a Chinese CBG. If all of your capital ships have unreliable engines then it makes your fleet a Paper Tiger.
It's 052D 173 Changsha. other 052Ds were normal. 173 was later replaced by 052D 174 Hefei. I haven't found any concrete evidence showing 173's engine broke down.Actually it was the transmission that was reported to be broken, rather than some problem with engines themselves... But, yeah, the question still remains...
You haven't refuted anything. The point of this discussion is to find out if the Ukrainian gas turbines used in new build PLAN ships are reliable or not. I doubt you even know which engine that is.I just reputed your previous false claim that Chinese ships bigger than 054A rarely leave home waters.
lol another false claim. see my previous post.You haven't refuted anything. The point of this discussion is to find out if the Ukrainian gas turbines used in new build PLAN ships are reliable or not. I doubt you even know which engine that is.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
China to launch indigenous aircraft carrier in 2013 | China | 1 | ||
Questioning Pakistan's claim on indigenous development of Jf-17/FC-1 with China | Pakistan | 100 | ||
China's J-11B indigenous WS-10A engines have no smoke | China | 6 | ||
I | China to build indigenous jet engine by 2016 | China | 0 |