China rejects re-opening of India's Lhasa consulate

[nimo_cn]

Any country can be given permission to have Consulate anywhere in China and it would make no difference.

But Tibet and Xinjiang are two kettles of fish where China would like to keep it a Forbidden Country.

The very fact that China has denied Consulates here (and there are good reasons why there should be from the Indian view point), show a diplomatic coup in exposing that China is running scared and are not willing to open up Tibet since there is repression galore.

The international community will take note.

For China, it is a diplomatic embarrassment!

If it is not so, why is China afraid to allow Consulates in Tibet?

Your tail is burning and they can smell it right in the UN Hq!

Tip for China: You have been oversmart for long, It is time to wake up and smell the coffee!

Not allowing America to have Consulates in Tibet is embarrassing, because America indeed has the right to have one as I have pointed out.

While rejecting India is more like rejecting a beggar who is asking for too much. The one should be embarrassed is India.

it is a matter of time for America to open up one in Tibet.

But for India, unless you have followed America and opened up enough consulates in other Chinese cities, then don't even think about it.

You just inviting contempt by asking for it.

 

[Ray]

How silly.

The USA is no where in being close to justification.

India has. There are a whole lot of Tibetans who wish to visit Tibet legally.

What beggar?

Your posterior is burning that you are resorting to tangential off topic stuff.

Go cool your posterior.

If you have no logical issue to discuss, go have a glass of warm milk and seek gratification within your physical form to calm your disturbed, irrational and illogical mind.

The facts prove that India has had China right and proper.

 

[Ray]

Not allowing America to have Consulates in Tibet is embarrassing, because America indeed has the right to have one as I have pointed out.

While rejecting India is more like rejecting a beggar who is asking for too much. The one should be embarrassed is India.

it is a matter of time for America to open up one in Tibet.

But for India, unless you have followed America and opened up enough consulates in other Chinese cities, then don't even think about it.

You just inviting contempt by asking for it.

For posterity.

If you speak of contempt, the it make interest you that the world hold China with contempt with it stealing of technology, copy catting, belligerency with weaker nations in SCS and aimless talk that indicates that China cannot put its money where its mouth is!

And then your double speak of Peaceful Rise when it is like a serpent acting coy only to raise its hood and hiss!

 

[Oracle]

There is no Indians in Tibet, so what is the real purpose of setting up an Indian Consulate?

The real purpose have been explained by Indian posters, if that have found any sense to your dumb neurons.

Setting up a terrorist camp there in the name of diplomacy? Indians are genius.

Setting up what? You twat, made in China weapons are confiscated from terrorists in the NE on a weekly basis. You and your stupid Chinese Monarchy support that terrorist of a state, Pakistan. You proliferate nuclear weapons. You sell fake medicines with Made in India label in Africa, you steal Intellectual property rights. Don't harp like a teenage girl experiencing her first menstrual cycle and as such bloody confused as to why the blood when there is no bloodshed.

 

[nimo_cn]

How silly.

The USA is no where in being close to justification.

India has. There are a whole lot of Tibetans who wish to visit Tibet legally.

What beggar?

Your posterior is burning that you are resorting to tangential off topic stuff.

Go cool your posterior.

Americans contribute the most to Tibet tourism, in this regard, they are most justified to have a consulte.

But where is India, how many Indians visit Tibet so far?

If there are more people in India want to visit China, it only means they need more Chinese consultes in India, not an Indian consulate in Tibet, Only afte you have got enough Indian visitors in Tibet, it warrants an Indian consulte in Tibet.

Yeah, we are on fire, we just rejected you. Keep asking for it, let us see how many times you are going to be rejected.

 

[nimo_cn]

For posterity.

If you speak of contempt, the it make interest you that the world hold China with contempt with it stealing of technology, copy catting, belligerency with weaker nations in SCS and aimless talk that indicates that China cannot put its money where its mouth is!

And then your double speak of Peaceful Rise when it is like a serpent acting coy only to raise its hood and hiss!

Now who is off topic?

 

[Ray]

Americans contribute the most to Tibet tourism, in this regard, they are most justified to have a consulte.

Childish!

Now go, wash your mouth and go to a Kiddy Forum.

Do excuse me, I do not strike a person who is weaker than me.

You requires tons of grey matter to qualify.

 

[Ray]

Now who is off topic?

So, now you are in the Gone for Tea Mode!

Good for you.

Who wrote the word 'contempt'?

Wasn't it a little bird called Nimo in that Gilded Cage?

Goodbye.

Come back when you have something intelligent to share.

 

[nimo_cn]

The real purpose have been explained by Indian posters, if that have found any sense to your dumb neurons.



Setting up what? You twat, made in China weapons are confiscated from terrorists in the NE on a weekly basis. You and your stupid Chinese Monarchy support that terrorist of a state, Pakistan. You proliferate nuclear weapons. You sell fake medicines with Made in India label in Africa, you steal Intellectual property rights. Don't harp like a teenage girl experiencing her first menstrual cycle and as such bloody confused as to why the blood when there is no bloodshed.

Chinese have a proverb '上阵父子兵', 'fight together like father and son'. As always, you two illustrate that proverb well.

 

[nimo_cn]

So, now you are in the Gone for Tea Mode!

Good for you.

Who wrote the word 'contempt'?

Wasn't it a little bird called Nimo in that Gilded Cage?

Goodbye.

Come back when you have something intelligent to share.

I believe it is someone else who said India was looking for humiliation before I did.

 

[Ray]

Chinese have a proverb '上阵父子兵', 'fight together like fater and son'. As always, you two illustrate that proverb well.

Like Mao and Deng and the poor Deng being shoved into jail!

 

[nimo_cn]

Like Mao and Deng and the poor Deng being shoved into jail!

Are you gonna shove Oracle into jail, or is he gonna shove you into jail, or you two shove each other into jail?

In any case, you two certainly fail the proverb.

 

[Ray]

树倒猢狲散

So the tree has fallen and you all are scattering.............for safety by obfuscating.

That proverb means:

When the tree falls, the monkeys scatter.
Usage: When a leader loses power, his followers become disorganized. This proverb is often used to describe fair-weather friends.

Now Madam Leader, why are you crying over spilt milk since your Brigade is no where to be seen having scattered and you rue the idea that Oracle is here to support me.

The truth is that he is supporting the truth that China has been had!

 

[Ray]

We are getting OT thanks to the usual Chines way, Madam Leader of China, of going tangential with obfuscation and irrelevance.

Could you return to the topic?

Anything intelligent to add?

Tip: Irrelevance will be deleted. And so will OT.

It costs money to run a Forum.

 

[Bhadra]

Then I guess China did the right thing to reject it since India has no intention to open up a consulate.

India could have kept going her ambessy at Lahsa including the Resent Commissioner and consulate at Yatung and three other places. But I do not know why Chinese forced India to close those. Relations are built over communications and presence. If China is sincere in her intentions to improve relations with India it must respond positively to reasonable and just Indian demands to have Embassy at Lhasa and Trade and cultural residencies at other places within Tibet.

The reality is that half of Tibetans are in India and Nepal. If Nepal has an embassy at Lhasa why not India?

 

[Bhadra]

@Nimo

China has recognised seven passes on India China border as common points between India and Tibet. Let those be the communication arteries between Tibet and India. Let there be a large volume of trade between Tibet and India.
That will make Tibet and China more prosperous and reduce burden of Chinese logistics who have to bring in various things into Tibet over thousands of miles. China can even transport their food and energy resources from India over those passes. But to do that there must be sizeable Indian presence in Lhasa and other trading towns.

Trust between the two countries has to be build.

 

[huaxia rox]

India has a historical right to have a consulate in four places inside tibet......

in historiy india was called british india.....and what british india can do has been a history....u can keep whinning or try launching another attack like what u did in 1962.....which ever way u wont get any tiny chance to open any indian consulate in tibet unless prc would like to allow u to do so......

 

[rockdog]

I think Chinese government is lack of wisdom for this matter, and this is the perfect chance to build better relationship with India.

1. We accept India's consulate in Lhasa:
a. which means India to repeat again to recognize Tibet is part of China.
b. only allow 1-3 diplomats in Lhasa, make them busy and no chance to do the flaming and spying work in Tibet.

2. Give a extra term to India: they also must setup a consulate in Aksai Chin with 20 diplomats there, which makes the the dispute area no more dispute.

3. Since we granted India's request, we need a pay back from India, then we find a good place in India's NE areas, to understand more local people and organization's need, i personally recommend Assam and Manipur.

 

[no smoking]

I think Chinese government is lack of wisdom for this matter, and this is the perfect chance to build better relationship with India.

1. We accept India's consulate in Lhasa:
a. which means India to repeat again to recognize Tibet is part of China.

They already did that for Chinese recognition of sikkim as indian territory. They cannot buy 2 products with 1 price.

b. only allow 1-3 diplomats in Lhasa, make them busy and no chance to do the flaming and spying work in Tibet.

Actually, they don't need that. They have Dalai's gov doing that for them.

2. Give a extra term to India: they also must setup a consulate in Aksai Chin with 20 diplomats there, which makes the the dispute area no more dispute.

That is a price that way abvoe.

3. Since we granted India's request, we need a pay back from India, then we find a good place in India's NE areas, to understand more local people and organization's need, i personally recommend Assam and Manipur.

I think that is a fair price. Maybe we can learn a lot from indian democratic gov on how to protect foreign splittists' human rights, such as allowing them to set up an government in exile on our soil or training an army consists of these foreigners.

 

[aeroblogger]

If Lhasa is a no-go, India should ask to set a consulate up in Kashgar instead!