China Economy: News & Discussion

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
what a typical ignorance of economic!


The increase in reserves is not "an indication of internal trouble sparked by the massive lending of Chinese banques ",but more money liquid in Chinese domestic market. it is not good to the control of inflation.
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
India vs. China: Whose Economy Is Better?

By MICHAEL SCHUMAN / HONG KONG Thursday, Jan. 28, 2010


In the inevitable comparisons that economists and businesspeople make between Asia's two rising giants, China and India, China nearly always comes out on top.

The Chinese economy historically outpaces India's by just about every measure. China's fast-acting government implements new policies with blinding speed, making India's fractured political system appear sluggish and chaotic. Beijing's shiny new airport and wide freeways are models of modern development, contrasting sharply with the sagging infrastructure of New Delhi and Mumbai. And as the global economy emerges from the Great Recession, India once again seems to be playing second fiddle. Pundits around the world laud China's leadership for its well-devised economic policies during the crisis, which were so effective in restarting economic growth that they helped lift the entire Asian region out of the downturn.

Now, however, India may finally have one up on its high-octane rival. Though India still can't compete on top-line economic growth — the World Bank projects India's gross domestic product (GDP) will increase 6.4% in 2009, far short of the 8.7% that China announced in mid-January – India's economy looks to be rebounding from the downturn in better shape than China's. India doesn't appear to be facing the same degree of potential dangers and downside risks as China, which means policymakers in New Delhi might have a much easier task in maintaining the economy's momentum than their Chinese counterparts. "The way I see it is that the growth in India is much more sustainable" than the growth in China, says Jim Walker, an economist at Hong Kong–based research firm Asianomics.

India's edge is due to the different stimulus programs adopted by the two countries to support growth during the downturn. China implemented what Walker calls "the biggest stimulus program in global history." On top of government outlays for new infrastructure and tax breaks, Beijing most significantly counted on massive credit growth to spur the economy. The amount of new loans made in 2009 nearly doubled from the year before to $1.4 trillion – representing almost 30% of GDP. The stimulus plan worked wonders, holding up growth even as China's exports dropped 16% in 2009.

But now China is facing the consequences of its largesse. Fears are rising that Beijing's easy-money policies have fueled a potential property-price bubble. According to government data, average real estate prices in Chinese cities jumped 7.8% in December from a year earlier — the fastest increase in 18 months. The credit boom has also sparked worries about the nation's banking system. Many economists expect the large surge in credit to lead to a growing number of nonperforming loans (NPLs). In a November report, UBS economist Wang Tao calculates that if 20% of all new lending in 2009 and 10% of the amount in 2010 goes bad over the next three to five years, the total amount of NPLs from China's stimulus program would reach $400 billion, or roughly 8% of GDP. Though Wang notes that the total is small compared with the level of NPLs that Chinese banks carried in the past, she still calls the sum "staggering." Policymakers in Beijing are clearly concerned. Since December, they have introduced a series of steps to cool down the housing market and restrict access to credit by, for example, reintroducing taxes on certain property transactions and raising the required level of cash that banks have to keep on hand in an effort to reduce new lending.

India, meanwhile, isn't experiencing nearly the same degree of fallout from its recession-fighting methods. The government used the same tools as every other to support growth when the financial crisis hit – cutting interest rates, offering tax breaks and increasing fiscal spending – but the scale was smaller than in China. Goldman Sachs estimates that India's government stimulus will total $36 billion this fiscal year, or only 3% of GDP. By comparison, China's two-year, $585 billion package is roughly twice as large, at about 6% of GDP per year. Most important, India managed to achieve its substantial growth without putting its banking sector at risk. In fact, India's banks have remained quite conservative through the downturn, especially compared with Chinese lenders. Growth of credit, for example, was actually lower in 2009 than in 2008. As a result, economists see continued strength in India's banks. A January report by economic-research outfit Centennial Asia Advisors noted that based on available data, "there was no sign that domestic banks' nonperforming assets were deteriorating materially." Nor do analysts harbor the same concerns that India's monetary policies are sending prices of Indian real estate to bubble levels. "India's growth, though less stellar, does have the reassuring factor that the [risks of] asset price bubbles are less," says Rajat Nag, managing director general of the Asian Development Bank in Manila.
India maintained robust growth without Beijing's hefty stimulus in part because it is less exposed to the international economy. China's exports represented 35% of GDP compared with only 24% for India in 2008. Thus India was afforded more protection from the worst effects of the financial crisis in the West, while China's government needed to be much more active to replace lost exports to the U.S. More significantly, though, India's domestic economy provides greater cushion from external shocks than China's. Private domestic consumption accounts for 57% of GDP in India compared with only 35% in China. India's confident consumer didn't let the economy down. Passenger car sales in India in December jumped 40% from a year earlier. "What we see [in India] is a fundamental domestic demand story that doesn't stall in the time of a global downturn," says Asianomics' Walker.

The Indian economy is not immune to risks. The government has to contend with a yawning budget deficit, and last year's weak monsoon rains will likely undercut agricultural production and soften rural consumer spending. But rapid growth is expected to continue. The World Bank forecasts India's economy will surge 7.6% in 2010 and 8% in 2011, not far behind the 9% rate it predicts for China for each of those years. Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, when speaking about his country's more plodding pace of economic policymaking, has said that "slow and steady will win the race." The Great Recession appears to have proved him right.
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
FOREX isn't money liquid in Chinese domestic market. What ever gave you that idea?
more forex means that CHinese center bank has to buy more dollars with more RMB .. which means that there are more monetary base.
 

Koji

Regular Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
758
Likes
1
Australia's Resourcehouse signs $60 bln deal with China

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/2010020...pY2xlX3N1bW1hcnlfbGlzdARzbGsDYXVzdHJhbGlhMzlz

SYDNEY (AFP) – Australian miner Resourcehouse said Saturday it had signed a 60-billion-US-dollar coal deal with energy-hungry China, calling it the country's "biggest-ever export contract."
Resourcehouse chairman Clive Palmer said the company had negotiated a 20-year agreement to supply China Power International Development (CPI) with 30 million tonnes of coal a year from a proposed mine in central Queensland.
"This deal with CPI is Australia?s biggest ever export contract," Palmer said in a statement.
The latest in a string of major deals between China and resource-rich Australia, the project signals a thaw in diplomatic tensions surrounding the detention of Rio Tinto executive Stern Hu and fraught iron ore price talks.
Palmer, Australia's fifth-richest man, said he had awarded the engineering and construction management contract for the eight-billion-US-dollar thermal coal mine, named "China First," to Metallurgical Corp of China (MCC).
"MCC will manage a syndicated group consisting of Sino Coal International Engineering Group, China Communications Construction Company (First Harbour) and China Railway Group Limited (CREC) to build Australia?s largest coal mine along with the required export infrastructure," the billionaire magnate said.
The Export-Import Bank of China had financed a 5.6 billion US dollar loan, Palmer said, but emphasised the project was 100 percent Australian-owned.
"This is Australia's largest single, non-syndicated, finance deal and the interest from China highlights the strength of the project and the benefits for Queensland and Australia in developing a new world-class coal region," he said.
A spokesman said Palmer was likely to fund the outstanding two billion US dollars in construction costs.
Executive director Phil McNamara said the "once-in-a-century project," which is expected to begin construction later this year, would include open-cut and underground mines and a 495-kilometre (308-mile) rail line.
Queensland premier Anna Bligh said the project would create tens of thousands of jobs, with annual royalties in excess of 605 million US dollars to flow to the state government from 2014.
CPI chairwoman Li Xiao Lin said the project was "opening up a massive new coal resource and the CPI Group of companies are pleased to be involved." China, the world's largest producer and user of coal, underpinned ten years of stellar growth for Australia's economy until the global financial crisis. Treasury chief Ken Henry in October predicted Chinese and Indian demand for resources would underpin a return to a decades-long commodities boom.
Australia is already China's largest coal supplier, accounting for 43.9 million of the 125.8 million tons of coal imported by the Asian giant in 2009.
China was Australia's third-largest investor in 2008, behind the United States and Britain. It accounted for 49 of the 153 deals involving Asian investors, mostly in mining acquisitions.
In August Australia inked a record 41.3 billion US dollar, 20-year deal to supply liquefied natural gas to PetroChina from its massive Gorgon gas field.
Two-way business between the countries has soared, averaging 22.5 percent growth over the past five years, putting China on course to outstrip Japan as Australia's top trading partner.

Chinese state-owned firms have made a series of bids for Australian resources, including the approval last October of Yanzhou Coal's 3.2-billion-US-dollar takeover of miner Felix.
Palmer plans to float Resourcehouse on the Hong Kong stock exchange next month in a bid to raise up to three billion dollars for coal, iron ore and oil and gas projects in Australia and oil and gas exploration in Papua New Guinea.
A November research report prepared by Macquarie Group analysts said Resourcehouse had a strong relationship with the Chinese government and "it is expected that a large part of its projects will be debt funded out of China."
"Chinese corporates will also be heavily involved in the design and construction of major coal and iron ore projects," the Macquarie report said.
-- Dow Jones Newswires contributed to this report --
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
Excellent presentation by Vitaliy Katsenelson on impending Chinese economy bubble bust.

China - The Mother of All Back Swans

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26781802/China-The-Mother-of-All-Black-Swans-By-Vitaliy-Katsenelson
it is always very cheap however potentially quite profitable to act as a prophet.

after all,

even if your predction were to porve wrong, you would lose nothing.

however, if you were a lucky bastard and your prediction prove to be right,you could become "famous" overnight.


that is why so many " Gordon Chang"s appears.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
China's building bubble about to burst

Published On Sun Feb 21 2010



A worker rests on a construction site of a real estate project in Guangzhou, in south China's Guangdong province. (Jan. 20, 2010)

By David Olive Business Columnist

Frenzied developers with access to cheap money are creating a glut of premium office space and luxury apartments, priced at about 80 times the average income of the city's residents. Prospective middle-class homeowners, in panic-buying mode, are snapping up two properties at once, hoping to flip the second one to finance the first. Civic officials are encouraging the building boom.

The sale of vacant lots bolster their municipal coffers.

Banks eager to reap upfront fees are granting mortgages to all comers. Even factory owners are in on the speculation, generating more profit from flipping property than from traditional manufacturing, which increasingly is moving offshore to Vietnam, Malaysia and other nations with lower labour costs.

No, this isn't Toronto in the late 1980s, or Santa Barbara or Tallahassee six years ago at the height of America’s record housing boom, which culminated in a global credit crisis and ensuing recession.

This is Beijing today, where until recently one of the most popular programs on local television was a reality show called The Romance of Housing that spotlighted the struggles of families pursuing elusive affordable shelter.

And where the papers are reporting on suicides and violent protests after developers in cahoots with local officials seize someone's land for a new office building or apartment block.

The disturbing phenomenon extends beyond Beijing, where housing prices are far higher than in Dubai's overbuilt property market before that red-hot Persian Gulf economy imploded last year. In December alone, Chinese housing prices rose almost 8 per cent in 70 major Chinese cities, while housing starts leapt by 34 per cent nationwide.

Jim Chanos, the legendary U.S. short-seller who thrives on post-bubble bargain-hunting, claims the overheated Chinese housing market is "Dubai times 1,000 — or worse."

Chanos has an obvious stake in chaos. Not so Patrick Chovanec, as associate professor at the business school at Beijing's Tsinghua University. Chovanec cites the intoxicating impact of Beijing's $586-billion (U.S.) stimulus package and an additional $1.4 trillion in lending by state-controlled banks to real estate and other industries last year alone.

With easy money in such abundance, it's no wonder developers are on a building jag.

"You have state-owned enterprises using borrowed funds from the stimulus bidding up the price of land in Beijing — not even desirable plots of land — to astronomical rates," Chovanec told Bloomberg News last week.

"At the same time, you have 30 per cent-plus vacancy rates and slumping rents in commercial property. So it's just a case of when (lenders] recognize the losses — or don't."

For the moment, there are two Chinese property markets. There's an over-served premium-priced office and luxury apartment sector, and a neglected affordable housing market so underserved for lack of profit margins that Beijing recently pledged on its own to build 15 million units of shelter for low-income people.

Limited though the boom is to the high end of the market, the stupendous sums tied up in it have the potential to impede, if not halt, China's fast-track Industrial Revolution when the boom inevitably ends.

"It's simply a matter of time before the Chinese real estate bubble bursts," insists Yi Xianrong, longtime student of Chinese property trends at the finance department of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. "A bubble burst in China would not only deal a fatal blow to our own economy, but would also extinguish the world's hope for recovery."

Indeed, Western economies are counting heavily on China to lead the nascent global recovery. China's projected GDP growth this year of about 9.5 per cent will account for about one-third of global economic growth this year.

China has been providing one of the bright spots in the recent global downturn.

Bankruptcy victim General Motors has lost money in North America and Europe for years, but it profits from booming Chinese sales.

And Paul Otelli, CEO of California-based Intel Corp., the world's leading computer-chip maker, recently said, "Thank God for China. It buoyed our company through the depths" of the recent global downturn.

China has just overtaken Germany as the world's largest export economy, and eclipsed the U.S. as the biggest vehicle market.

Wen Jiaboa, the Chinese premier, has acknowledged that "property values have risen too quickly," and vowed a crackdown on speculators. China's central bank has twice this month raised the amount of capital Chinese banks must hold in reserve to cover losses, reducing funds available for property loans. But government officials are in a quandary over how hard to apply the brakes. A sudden about-face in Beijing's easy-money policy of ultralow interest rates could trigger widespread property devaluations that would hit not only homeowners but also construction, finance, steel, furniture and other sectors tied to the real estate market.

Yet the longer the bubble persists, the more punishing the inevitable implosion, as Western economies learned from the collapse of the U.S. housing market in 2007-08.

So, uncertainty rules.

A soft landing can be engineered if China's recent, modest steps to cool the market send a powerful enough signal to developers and panic buyers — and provide enough time for a rise in average income levels to match exorbitant housing prices.

In the meantime, there are a few signs the mania is exhausting itself. The new "instant city" of skyscrapers and thousands of villas built in the coal city of Ordos in China's Inner Mongolia is largely vacant — a sobering sign to overzealous developers.

"Who would go there?" a downtown resident told Bloomberg Business Week recently of the sprawling metropolis taking shape in the nearby suburban desert. "It's a city of empty buildings."

The Romance of Housing show was yanked from the air in November, ostensibly because state officials were offended by a scene depicting a corrupt state official. But the show more likely got the hook over concerns that it celebrated recklessness with personal finances. And in Beijing, dirt is accumulating around the entrances to the newly built twin-tower head office complex of the Bank of Communications Co.

In a business district with a 35 per cent vacancy rate due to over-exuberant developer activity, the lobby of the BCC landmark is now used as a bicycle parking lot.

http://www.thestar.com/business/article/769105--olive-china-s-building-bubble-about-to-burst
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
China Takes Issue With Fitch Downgrades

FEBRUARY 22, 2010

SHANGHAI -- A senior China central bank official on Monday took issue with Fitch Rating Inc.'s recent credit-rating downgrades of China Merchants Bank Corp. and China Citic Bank Corp., and said the operations of all Chinese banks are sound despite the global financial crisis.

It isn't unusual for China to fight back on such a research note. In May 2006, Ernst & Young LLP received a sharp rebuke from Beijing for the auditing firm's estimate of the size of bad loans in China. Four days after China lashed out against the report, Ernst & Young retracted its opinion and made an apology.

But in a slight departure from that time, Xuan Changneng, head of the Financial Stability Bureau of the People's Bank of China, acknowledged that China's lending spree last year exposed domestic banks to huge credit risk and pressure to increase capital and profit.

The remarks by Mr. Xuan are the first high-level response to Fitch's downgrades of the two banks' credit ratings earlier this month. The downgrades have had little effect on capital markets in China, but they highlighted mounting concerns about the long-term health of the country's banking system following extraordinary credit growth in 2009.

Chinese banks extended a record 9.6 trillion yuan (about $1.405 trillion) in new yuan loans last year, nearly double the amount in 2008.

"We hope major rating-agencies including Fitch make fair judgments on China's financial institutions based on objective criteria," Mr. Xuan said in a question-and-answer interview published by the PBOC-backed Financial News.

"Chinese banks have successfully withstood the impact of the global financial crisis and kept a solid trend of development. Compared to their global peers, Chinese banks maintain higher capital adequacy ratios and higher quality of capital," he added.

On Feb. 2, Fitch lowered the ratings of China Merchants and Citic Bank to D -- which signifies "weaknesses of internal and/or external origin" -- from C/D. A bank with a C rating is "adequate," but with "one or more troublesome aspects."

It was the first time in more than six years that Fitch had downgraded a Chinese bank. The ratings agency cited an aggressive increase in lending by the two banks in the January-September period last year, as well as the subsequent erosion of the amount of capital they hold against each loan.

"Fitch's downgrades haven't had a significant negative impact on the market, nor will the move affect the regulators' supervision and support of the two banks," Mr. Xuan said, adding the capital adequacy ratios of the two banks meet regulatory requirements and their nonperforming loans have continued to fall.

However, he warned of slower profit growth and potential bad loans in China's banking sector. He said last year's robust lending growth is challenging banks' asset quality and also putting pressure on them to seek new capital. In addition, Chinese banks will face pressure to increase profit in a sustainable way due to their limited revenue sources, he said.

Profit growth at most banks has slowed despite the size of the new lending as Beijing's aggressive lending rate cuts in the second half of 2008 tightly squeezed their interest margins. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., the nation's largest lender by market value, last month projected a 15% rise in 2009 net profit, the slowest earnings growth in the past seven years.

—Rose Yu and Liu Li

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704454304575080751988338766.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Would appreciate if you could use some intellect to criticize the points made by the author instead of tying everyone to Gordon Chang. This presentation is very persuasive in its projections and seems to be very rationale, not to you, to us. If you don't have anything valuable to add refrain from posting trite and useless commentary.


it is always very cheap however potentially quite profitable to act as a prophet.

after all,

even if your predction were to porve wrong, you would lose nothing.

however, if you were a lucky bastard and your prediction prove to be right,you could become "famous" overnight.


that is why so many " Gordon Chang"s appears.
 

johnee

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
3,473
Likes
499
DD,
that was a great presentation a must for all. Thanx.
 

mattster

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
1,171
Likes
870
Country flag
Here is my take: For years, the "Western Press" has gone gaga over the "China growth story". Sure it was a very big story, but the Western Press really overhyped the story. China was going to take over the whole world and dominate anything and everything - similar to what they said about Japan 30 years ago.
Now there are looking deeper and seeing some real problems and going the reverse direction in knocking the "the China growth story" down.

In both cases, it is an over-reaction on the part of the media.

Sure there is a huge property/asset bubble in China mainly in the big cities - but unlike the US, people in China still have savings even when they buy houses. The Chinese always have to have personal savings in case of emergency because they have no social security net. Unlike the US, where many people invested their entire net worth in homes they could not afford thinking it would appreciate but should have never bought in the 1st place, I think people in China are probably more conservative. So even if an asset bubble were to burst, you wont see entire middle-class families becoming homeless, and out on the street. China is probably better equipped to handle an asset bubble than many Western countries.

I personally know about 4 or 5 personal friends with good incomes who bought homes here in the Bay area, US that were significantly above their income level. When i asked these guys - how do you justify spending 60-70% of you take-home paypacket on your house payment without any savings; the answer I got was that "my house is my saving" !!
I am sure that this type of mentality does not exist in China.

The whole China story has been severely overhyped and now the pendulum is swinging to the other extreme but I think that the truth is somewhere in the middle.
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
The Chinese always have to have personal savings in case of emergency because they have no social security net.
while echoing your insight into generally 'conservative' mindset and the 'overhyped', I have to correct the perception 'no security net' in China (kind of outdated. not robust but nor entirely 'NO'). u can't view China as a WHOLE in this regard. things vary -
* Urban vs Rural China
* Big/Medium cities vs Small
* Coastal provinces vs Inland
* East vs West
* State owned enterprises vs Private (and Foreign investment)
since current system leaves room for 'implementation' adapted to 'local reality'. In China different provinces (and some authorized municipalities) are allowed to 'tailor-make' social security standards' to some degree, just like that minimum wage policy. any in-depth analysis is gonna be tedious.

Most Chinese buy property/asset on mortgage. the bubble is being 'controlled' by means of adjustment in such as
* interest rate - recently actually it's up with most banks and mainly for the 'second' or more home mortgage per household (again, varying in different places)
* raising the bar for down payment (now 30-40%??), also varying depending on it's the '1st' home mortgage or not, and in different places
* transaction tax - up recently
* land auction - increasing supply to deter speculations
* restriction on real estate developers' fund-raising (from banks and the security market)

Foreign observers are often susceptible to a monolith image of China, and meantime 'forget' the effectiveness in being a 'totalitarian' state somehow.
 
Last edited:

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Foreign observers are often susceptible to a monolith image of China, and meantime 'forget' the effectiveness in being a 'totalitarian' state somehow.
It hasn't stopped Chinese banques from spending 20% of their 2010 lending target in one month.
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
It hasn't stopped Chinese banques from spending 20% of their 2010 lending target in one month.
recall u separately posted some data on %% of investment went to real estate.

flagged as French u certainly understand seemingly contradictory things exist everywhere like in FR. on one hand it's called 'totalitarian' implying the government has a forceful regulatory role, on the other hand it's a market economy where the 'invisible hand' is at work. banks - commercial banks - are vying for what they see as profitable slices of business. In CHINA (unlike some others) property development is considered still a lucrative sector which capital opts to flow in, when compared to other sectors (manufacturing/export) that appear 'over supplied' especially during the crisis. at this point the state intervenes with monetary policies to put 'bubbles' under check and encourage the flow to other sectors such as eco-energy and stimulate consumption.

by the way instinctively disagree to your inflation prediction, against the backdrop of a general 'oversupply'.
 

mattster

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
1,171
Likes
870
Country flag
while echoing your insight into generally 'conservative' mindset and the 'overhyped', I have to correct the perception 'no security net' in China (kind of outdated. not robust but nor entirely 'NO'). u can't view China as a WHOLE in this regard. things vary -
* Urban vs Rural China
* Big/Medium cities vs Small
* Coastal provinces vs Inland
* East vs West
* State owned enterprises vs Private (and Foreign investment)
since current system leaves room for 'implementation' adapted to 'local reality'. In China different provinces (and some authorized municipalities) are allowed to 'tailor-make' social security standards' to some degree, just like that minimum wage policy. any in-depth analysis is gonna be tedious.
Your point is taken. No big large complex society is easy to characterize or analyze, but my general point when I said "no social security net" was that it is probably way behind Western Europe. Even the US social security net is falling behind Europe and Japan.

I am sure that many Chinese government workers and civil servants, military personnel get pensions and so on when they retire, but whether those pensions are enough to live on is another question. Private companies may pay better and give you more bonuses but you may not get a pension when you retire.

In general, long term retirement benefits like 401K retirement plan, pension, social security, free medical care, etc are things that most Chinese do not have. In any society that does not have such systems, there is going to be a tendency to save more and be prepared for a rainy day. As more and more benefits get whittled away here in the US, you will see people here in the US starting to save more.

Even in cases where free medical care is given to the people free of charge; I know for a fact that in many Asian and South-East Asian countries, most middle-class people who prefer to pay for a private hospital or doctor than go to the free public hospital because the quality of care is so bad.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
recall u separately posted some data on %% of investment went to real estate.

flagged as French u certainly understand seemingly contradictory things exist everywhere like in FR. on one hand it's called 'totalitarian' implying the government has a forceful regulatory role, on the other hand it's a market economy where the 'invisible hand' is at work. banks - commercial banks - are vying for what they see as profitable slices of business. In CHINA (unlike some others) property development is considered still a lucrative sector which capital opts to flow in, when compared to other sectors (manufacturing/export) that appear 'over supplied' especially during the crisis. at this point the state intervenes with monetary policies to put 'bubbles' under check and encourage the flow to other sectors such as eco-energy and stimulate consumption.

by the way instinctively disagree to your inflation prediction, against the backdrop of a general 'oversupply'.
Across all the major sectors, China is about 30% overcapacity. Apartments and office buildings sit empty, warehouse shelves are overstocked without customers. Chinese wages aren't rising fast enough to make up for it and neither are export destinations. With inflation on the rise it will make it even worse. The attempts to reign in the overheat in January were not just a failure, but actually saw it increased. If China really does get serious about putting the brakes on lending, the economy will come to a grinding halt. The CCP can't allow that or they will have riots on their hands. It is interesting to note how the rhetoric towards Washington has changed in the last couple of months with the Taiwan arms deal, the Google debacle, and the Dalai Lama visit just to name a few. It is like the CCP is preparing the people for their new arch nemesis to distract them from their crumbling economy. I won't be surprised when the public starts losing their shirts in real estate and stocks, they will blame it on America. China will then push their overstocked goods at rock-bottom prices forcing a trade war with the West. Oh yeah, its going to get interesting.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Very interesting to see no more migrant workers going to the cities to work as slave labour. 200m will be unemployed once the excessive construction stops.
 

Koji

Regular Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
758
Likes
1
Huawei Ranked 5th Most Innovative Company in the World

PLANO, Texas, Feb 26, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Fast Company, the highly-respected and award-winning US-based monthly magazine, has ranked Huawei the fifth most innovative company in the world for 2010, behind only Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Google. Huawei was the only new-entrant to the list of the top five most innovative companies.

Fast Company credited Huawei's strong business growth in 2009 to its leadership in customer-centric innovation. In an article in the March 2010 issue, Fast Company said of Huawei: "Huawei Technologies shot past Alcatel-Lucent and Nokia Siemens in 2009 to become the world's No. 2 telecom-equipment provider, powered by quality and product upgrades ... in the past year, it has won a slew of lucrative, prestigious contracts ... the sum of these deals was good enough to double Huawei's global market share."

Commenting on this honor, Charlie Chen, senior vice president, marketing and product management of Huawei USA said: "One of Huawei's key differentiators is our customer-centric innovation strategy that is focused on understanding operator needs and rapidly delivering customized network solutions to create maximum value. It is a long term investment towards continuous innovation designed around close partnerships with operators to overcome challenges and achieve business success."

Huawei has a deep and longstanding commitment to innovation:

-- Ranks No. 2 in global patent filings, with 1,847 in 2009, according to the United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization patent list

-- In 2009, 46 percent of Huawei's employees were dedicated to R&D

-- As part of a worldwide integrated product development process, Huawei operates 17 global R&D centers and operates over 22 joint innovation centers with its customers

-- Huawei has successfully deployed the world's first LTE (long-term evolution) commercial network for TeliaSonera in Oslo, Norway

Fast Company's Top 50 of The World's Most Innovative Companies can be found at www.fastcompany.com/mic/2010.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/huawei-ra...nk=MW_news_stmp

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/huawei-ra...nk=MW_news_stmp
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top