sayareakd
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 17,734
- Likes
- 18,953
1998 test posted first on India Today.That is not shaped like a warhead. The picture quality appears to be taken from a negative based camera and hence possibly 1974 test
1998 test posted first on India Today.That is not shaped like a warhead. The picture quality appears to be taken from a negative based camera and hence possibly 1974 test
One test itself was 45kT. Rest were smaller fission bombs.Well, it was the India government provided the picture to media.
Or God can't help India convince the whole world that the nuclear tests yield was 45kt in total.
That was the problem. H-bomb can be scaled down deliberately, however it can also be a fizzle, or partly failed. That is why all P5 did mt test first: their scientists could be sure that their h-bomb theory is correct. It is like building a house: MT h-bomb is the most basic part of the whole field, like the foundation of the house while the following minimization is the upper level.
Any official publication indicating that? I remember somewhere reading one of device exploded or to be exploded was pulled from earlier stock to check its validity. Also I dont know how correct is Wiki entry, BUt Shakti 3 is being alluded to another Thermo device without its primaryThermo nuke, going into A2, that size is for A2 only.
Yes you found out the problem but at wrong place. The problem is that wrong set of data or erroneous data that you are referring to. Even hardcore skeptics have referred to yield of Thermonuke alone to be of min 25 /22 KT. Given commie bots generally gulp down hot red $hit coming down from red commie septic tank unquestionably, I understand why erroneous figures are coming from youHere is the problem: the scientists outside India estimated the actual total detonated was only 12kt for all 3 bombs on 11/05..
North Korea? Well, they claimed that was a H-bomb but no one else buys it.North Korea tested 200kT bomb directly without going to Megaton range. So, your theory fails here too.
Again, India claims it was 45kt but outside world estimation was only 12kt. Until today, 19 years later, the dispute is not settled yet.Also, fizzle is not practical if the maximum explosive capacity of first stage was 15-20kt while explosion was of 45kT. The second stage must have been exploded to give at least 20kT
Arun sir is great authority on Indian missiles. I used to talk to him at his forum. Wish he started posting again.@sayareakd By the way do you know where Arun Vishvakarma posts these days? After abrupt exodus from other forum - to his brief stay in indiaforums(now defunkt!?) - to his last presence found via few presentations found in slideshare, he sort of vanished> He had very good knowledge around Indian past, current and future missile capabilities as well as payload. His predictions(more than decade back) mostly came true. Wonder if he is still active on other forums or twitter.
Nothing official but it was weapon, here.Any official publication indicating that? I remember somewhere reading one of device exploded or to be exploded was pulled from earlier stock to check its validity. Also I dont know how correct is Wiki entry, BUt Shakti 3 is being alluded to another Thermo device without its primary
Thanks @Kshithij,All wrong. Thermonuclear warheads weigh 200kg for 200kT. No one uses boosted fission for anything above 40kT. Boosted fission is plutonium heavy while H-bomb needs little plutonium and mostly Deuterium, Tritium and U238 (fully depleted Uranium).
250kg for 20kT bomb is extremely horrible design. I am sure this is not the case.
45kT may not be fizzle. The Indian scientists tried to answer many questions about it but eventually realized that westerners were fooling India into handing over sensitive data of tests as proof by this tactic and hence stopped defending it. Thermonuclear bombs can be scaled to any extent. They just kept it low weight.
The warhead is made to be as small as possible. Look at W88 or W87 or W78 warheads - almost 1kg per 1kT.
Prithvi 1 & 2 are not tactical missile. They are liquid fuel and will be phased out. Prithvi 3 is a short ranged missile.
Prahaar will replace Prithvi 1 as the tactical missile of 150km range. Prithvi 2 may not be replaced. Pragati is export variant of prahaar. Irrelevant for India.
Shaurya is a semi cruise cum ballistic missile. It is highly maneuverable and has 700km range.
I am not sure of Agni 1P. It is a new missile. It isn't tested yet as far as I know.Thanks @Kshithij,
What about Agni 1P, it may replace Prithvi II.
And what can be the number of Prahar we produce in an year? Anyone?
The "outside world" quoted all types of figures from 12KT to 45KT. But you seem to be obsessed only with the lowest one - well whatever makes you sleep better.North Korea? Well, they claimed that was a H-bomb but no one else buys it.
Again, India claims it was 45kt but outside world estimation was only 12kt. Until today, 19 years later, the dispute is not settled yet.
I have been sleeping very well because 45kt or 12kt doesn't make any different to Chinese. We have been threatened by the most powerful nuclear country - USA with hundreds million tongs yield warheads. India's nuclear weapons won't make that worse.The "outside world" quoted all types of figures from 12KT to 45KT. But you seem to be obsessed only with the lowest one - well whatever makes you sleep better.
Whether you kill or you overkill - result is the same.I have been sleeping very well because 45kt or 12kt doesn't make any different to Chinese. We have been threatened by the most powerful nuclear country - USA with hundreds million tongs yield warheads. India's nuclear weapons won't make that worse.
Instead, 12kt or 45kt will make a big difference to most of Indians' sleep.
Actually, nukes are overhyped. 45kT won't do much. Today's world has concrete/cement based structures unlike the past wooden ones.Whether you kill or you overkill - result is the same.
You are wrong. Nuclear explosion in itself does not cause much damages, but nuclear fallout and radiation kills the most. Concrete buildings will remain but life will be snuffed out far & beyond and over a long period of time.........Actually, nukes are overhyped. 45kT won't do much. Today's world has concrete/cement based structures unlike the past wooden ones.
Nope.You are wrong. Nuclear explosion in itself does not cause much damages, but nuclear fallout and radiation kills the most. Concrete buildings will remain but life will be snuffed out far & beyond and over a long period of time.........
You're thinking of salted bomb. The idea of a salted bomb is to wrap the nuclear core into a material which will convert into radioactive isotopes when it receives neutron bombardment. The explosion will scatter this "salt" into the target area and make it radioactive to life. The same effect can be designed in a thermonuclear bomb, which is specifically meant to radiate fast neutron radiation. These are typically low yield, and these type of warheads were also used in ABM missiles in the past, the goal being the neutron radiation would fry electronics and initiate fission primary of any incoming nuclear warhead. Point is modern bomb designs are advanced enough that the amount of fallout to energy output can be controlled by specific designs.You are wrong. Nuclear explosion in itself does not cause much damages, but nuclear fallout and radiation kills the most. Concrete buildings will remain but life will be snuffed out far & beyond and over a long period of time.........