despite the much chest thumping about the small size of the airframe and the light matrials composite blah blah the thrust weight of Tejas is less than 1 when the optimal is 1.1. where is the problem? what is contributing to tejas weight? also is there a lot of monitoring eqipment currently installed which is contributing to the load and which of course will be shed?
Rahul what about the Tejas AoA document? any luck?
Tejas is already the Lightest fighter aircraft in world.
But not by large margin , Gripen weighs only a few Kg more,
Which it self is feat.
Even the JAS 39 Gripen does not have a Trust to weight Ratio greater than 1
It used to use the same engine as the LCA mind you. A modified version of the GE-404
The New Gripen with the GE-414 engine is supposed to have a Trust to weight Ratio greater than 1.
The same is true for the Tejas. That's why IAF is so persistent of a more powerful engine.
But there are very few Engine that produce the required trust and also fit into the Tejas, it is a challenging task.
Another Problem with the LCA is the AoA.
Articles reference Tejas AoA to be ~20 degree.
IAF want's it to be greater than 21 at least.
Some people have cited poorly designed air intakes as the the reason for such low AoA.
However LCA-N is supposed to have
wing leading edge vortex controllers (LEVCON) to increase lift during approach. The LEVCONs are control surfaces that extend from the wing-root leading edge and thus afford better low-speed handling for the LCA, which would otherwise be slightly hampered due to the increased drag that results from its delta-wing design. As an added benefit, the LEVCONs will also increase controllability at high angles of attack (AoA).
And recent articles quoted Attempts to increase LCA AoA a bit more