Akash Surface-to-air Missile

Discussion in 'Defence & Strategic Issues' started by LETHALFORCE, Mar 24, 2009.

  1. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,913
    BARAK-8 had 2 israeli things - seeker and radar. With seeker indigenised the BARAK-8 missile has become fully Indian. With the development of Indian radar, even BARAK-8 system can be indigenised fully.

    Did Israel help in seeker development as a tacit understanding of military alliance against common enemy? Do you have any idea?
     
  2. porky_kicker

    porky_kicker No longer active Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    3,411
    Likes Received:
    19,240
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...........................
     
  3. porky_kicker

    porky_kicker No longer active Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    3,411
    Likes Received:
    19,240
    this much i can speculate that cross pollination of tech/knowledge might have happened during drdo's involvement with Russians (astra seeker) and Israelis (barak seeker) but drdo seekers in akash 1s / astra / QRSAM etc is totally indigenous and they hold the IPR to it.
     
    darshan978 and Kshithij like this.
  4. porky_kicker

    porky_kicker No longer active Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    3,411
    Likes Received:
    19,240
    nice pic of army troop level radar for akash sam - rajendra radar

    Troop-Level-Radar-for-Akash-Missile-System-Army-version.jpg
     
    SKC, darshan978, Willy2 and 4 others like this.
  5. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,913
    Actually this can happen more often than not. To avoid radars being hit with HARM missile, Radars are generally kept in the back while launchers are kept near the border. If the enemy plane crosses the border, the SAM system will fire right under its nose. Since it is prohibited to fire when enemy plane is outside border, the SAM won't fire even if enemy plane is in range until border is breached by when the plane will be right in front of the missile launcher

    You are making an assumption that the radar and the launcher are at same place. But this is not necessary. Static launch station can be connected to the radar by high speed cable and separated by some distance. Since the radars used are high powered ones, they generally have better range than the missile and the difference in distance won't affect the performance.
     
    BlackJay, darshan978 and porky_kicker like this.
  6. porky_kicker

    porky_kicker No longer active Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    3,411
    Likes Received:
    19,240
    yeah........................................................
     
  7. porky_kicker

    porky_kicker No longer active Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    3,411
    Likes Received:
    19,240
    akash sam combat command and control center

    Untitled.jpg
     
    aditya10r, SKC, darshan978 and 6 others like this.
  8. HariPrasad-1

    HariPrasad-1 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2016
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    8,364
    Location:
    Gujarat
    I think Israeli RADAR and Seeker are much advance. Ours will be very very cheap may be at 1/5 th of cost though it may not have high kill ration like MRSAM, it will have a very decent ration much better than Akash. It shall really be a great value for money. I do not think that any plane can escape from it though it may not be as effective as MRSAM against supersonic cruise missile.
     
  9. darshan978

    darshan978 Darth Vader

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2017
    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    663
    You are just assuming things.........................
     
    Kshithij likes this.
  10. Armand2REP

    Armand2REP CHINI EXPERT Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    13,746
    Likes Received:
    6,327
    Israeli components are usually advanced because they have direct access to US components and bilateral tech. The downside is they are subject to US pressure otherwise they cannot even export the product.
     
  11. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,913
    Correct, but they have been exporting to India for some time now. So, India has obtained their technology. India also has access to Russian technology. Now, it may have used it to develop its own radar.
     
  12. Kunal Biswas

    Kunal Biswas Member of the Year 2011 Moderator

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    31,124
    Likes Received:
    40,468
    Location:
    BHARAT, INDIA, HINDUSTHAN
    The seeker and radar in talk with respect to MRSAM, Are completely different from AKASH SAM ..

    Akash NG is the one with active seeker and a new kind of radar, perhaps better than Israeli have to offer ..
     
    Kshithij and SanjeevM like this.
  13. Armand2REP

    Armand2REP CHINI EXPERT Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    13,746
    Likes Received:
    6,327
    Israel has been exporting to India because the US has not had a problem supporting India. If that ever changed you would find it to be a problem. You do not have these issues buying Russian or even French because our technology is proprietary.
     
    Butter Chicken likes this.
  14. Indibomber

    Indibomber Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2015
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    1,028
    I am not sure if the two systems are comparable. I am up for Indian systems but as of now Barak-8 is appears to be a better system. Barak-8 is lighter in weight and smaller in dimension and can secure bigger areas. Akash is faster.. and most importantly Indian. I will appreciate both the products on different levels and cannot compare the two.
     
    BlackJay likes this.
  15. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,913
    Akash is too heavy to be used on ships. I am just saying that the BARAK-8 seekers which is imported from Israel can now be made indian.

    Though, I must admit, I don't know if they are compatible with the radars
     
  16. Chinmoy

    Chinmoy Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Messages:
    4,989
    Likes Received:
    7,436
    For something to target at a distance of 30km+ from ground, till date we cannot afford to have a Active seeker to work in Fire and Forget mode. We need to have a power source strong enough to support it for that long duration.
    Passive seeker is another thing. Moreover are you aware whether we came up with a Passive or Active seeker this time?
     
    porky_kicker likes this.
  17. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,913
    The motor itself can have a small dynamo for power. This is not a problem. Also, with speeds of 3Mach, 30km will be 30 seconds. Not much actually
     
  18. mayfair

    mayfair Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,033
    Likes Received:
    13,018
    Location:
    India
    Russian yes, there will be problems but of a different sort.

    French, would have been the case in the past, but your folks did renege on the Mistral deal, so that would make your future customers a tad wary.
     
  19. Armand2REP

    Armand2REP CHINI EXPERT Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    13,746
    Likes Received:
    6,327
    If the best example you have is a leading member of NATO reneging on Russia for invading another European state, I rather wear that with a badge of pride and highly doubt seeing any prospective buyers using that as a sticking point.
     
    BlackJay likes this.
  20. porky_kicker

    porky_kicker No longer active Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    3,411
    Likes Received:
    19,240
    IMO <30km can be supported in Fire and Forget mode. all in all it boils down to the OEM design/requirements obviously within SWaP constraints.

    drdo has at its disposal a wide range of lithium thermal batteries to take care of onboard power requirements for missiles etc.

    Untitled.jpg
    eg.
    power (watts), life(s), weight(g)
    4000, 300, 6500
    500, 60, 570
    160, 480, 1000
    175, 40, 300
    700, 200, 3000
    336, 165, 1050
    15000, 105, 5700
    etc
    etc
    etc

    basic battery design

    q.jpg

    these are manufactured by HBL and many of these are also exported.

    e.jpg

    unless drdo clarifies it is difficult to know for certain whether it is a Passive or Active seeker ,

    anyways i have a feeling that given that akash mk1 is command guided , its highly possible they came up with active seeker (for terminal guidance) with a radar-supported inertial navigation system ( for mid course guidance ) for akash mk1s .
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2017

Share This Page