War was started for annexing Kashmir from India and ended up celebrating defending Lahore after UN intervention!
Full scale war? Full scale war is never fought between a full scale country and fractional scale ideological entity.
Not really, we produce 7 times more centrifuges than Pakistan, enough to build around a 1,000,
If India diverts most of it's output to civil nuclear power doesn't mean that it necessarily will always.
Not really, India's homegrown weapon share is 40% by cost and 60% in numbers, still expanding & there's a reason why weapon exports jumped by 6 times in 2 years.
Pakistan is worse in that case.
It is inducting the weapons like JFT & small corvettes of old class which India is retiring these days.
Chinese doctrine doesn't allow sacrifice of own soldiers in a full scale war unless it's to protect Chinese sovereignty.
This newer JFT specifications were somewhat of IAF in 90s.
This shows paki standard, threatening India with an outdated bird, seriously, you know why India rejected F-16?
Not really, neither China has enough empty slots to assist someone in a war when their own requirement isn't fulfilled, nor they can provide you reconnaissance.
We do have no source Pakistan having stimulator & shocker tunnels, ion thrusters, independent research in fusion, thorium based reactors, fast breeder reactors, designs as that of IPWR or third generation nuclear reactors.
This is enough reason to believe.
We know Pakistanis didn't test Plutonium warheads which are needed for miniaturization rather they tested HEU implosion type warheads to be replicated in plutonium type pit as New Labs facility at PINSTECH only came online.in may 1998 . So Pakistanis have not tested a Plutonium spherical implosion device but a Linear implosion device.
This device upon detonation the high explosive will drive the pusher plate into the tamper, which will then begin linear implosion of the fissile mass which will not only compress the plutonium but will push it inward and away from the control rods the same time, the lip on the outside of each control rod will "catch" a small portion of the force from the explosive.
Now these devices will not give more than 10% efficiency without testingwhich Pakistan has not , so Pakistan's triad will not be useful for countervalue targeting .
Final test of MANIK turbofan is around the corner, you'll experience the speed of light after that in UAV's & cruise.
The second LRCM with a 6-7kN afterburning turbofan & range of 3,000 kms.
Anyway, cruise missile fits as a tactical weapon in India's doctrine. It's not a strategic game changer.
Assembling NPO Saturn engines with fuselages and making low range cruisers isn't a success
Successful cruise missiles? India has more CIWS than Pakistan has cruise missiles. It's easier to shoot down a subsonic cruising object than a ballistic one in fact.
How they are similar? Pakistan still uses liquid fuel.
When India has moved to gyro, Pakistan still relies on unreliable retro thrusters.
Do you have QBM? No,
ICBM? No
SLBM? No
ShLBM? No
High precision intermediate ballistic missile? No
Agni 3 is world's most accurate operational IRBM with a CEP of 40 metres.
Again issue of standards, which systems these subs employ?
How many can Pak afford.
Intellectual property score to global hunger index explains what's the quality of Paki soldiers.
@pmaitra
I respect you, you're humble, fair and that's why a mod but why the hell you let this thread exist still?
Not lock it but delete it. We don't need others' agenda on Kashmir to be run.