Sukhoi Su 30MKI

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
New Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
Firstly, the idea of stealth is to shorter the enemy's detect range not invisible: i.e. AEWC can detect a third generation jet such as Su-27 or F-15 around 300-400 km but the distance will be narrowed to 100km or even less when faces a stealth plane. The gap already gives stealth plane a big advantage.
Certainly, you can bring in other ground and air radars to support, but so far it is still in early stage, both Russia and China having been working on this for decades, but they come to the same conclusion: the best weapon against a stealth jet is a stealth jet.
The best weapon to defend against a stealth jet is ground based SAM. Stealth jets are offensive weapons, not defensive. So, to attack the enemy, you need stealth jets but to defend territory, you need SAM
 

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
The best weapon to defend against a stealth jet is ground based SAM. Stealth jets are offensive weapons, not defensive. So, to attack the enemy, you need stealth jets but to defend territory, you need SAM
So far there is not a single SAM can lock a stealth plane from 50 km away. Russia claims her s-400 can do the job, but......
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
New Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
So far there is not a single SAM can lock a stealth plane from 50 km away. Russia claims her s-400 can do the job, but......
50km is too less. I would say 100km is the right distance, unless the stealth plane is in terrain hugging mode. S200, an old version of S400 even hit an Israeli F35, though it was said that F35 still managed to land in Israel with heavy damage. Israel later claimed that F35 hit storks during routine training
 

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
50km is too less. I would say 100km is the right distance, unless the stealth plane is in terrain hugging mode. S200, an old version of S400 even hit an Israeli F35, though it was said that F35 still managed to land in Israel with heavy damage. Israel later claimed that F35 hit storks during routine training
It is your right to believe this kind of BS. Last time, the S-200 fails to intercept Israel
Chinese has both S300 and S400, and they don't show that capability.
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
New Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
It is your right to believe this kind of BS. Last time, the S-200 fails to intercept Israel
Chinese has both S300 and S400, and they don't show that capability.
S200 hitting F35 may have been coincidence. Also, since F35 was not destroyed, one can say that the hit was from a distance and not direct. Only a small fraction of the warhead hit F35 but even that was enough to ground it permanently
 

Jaguar_1432

New Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2018
Messages
24
Likes
19
For sure, this or that mean of weapons has different purpose. Even from the name SAM is designed to ensure protection against air aggression.
To be honest and speaking about stealth aircraft interception, it's not an easy task even for SAMs like S-300 or S-400.
 

bhramos

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,644
Likes
37,250
Country flag
what happened 40 Su-30 MKI ordered ?
were they delivered or cancelled !!!
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
New Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
what happened 40 Su-30 MKI ordered ?
were they delivered or cancelled !!!
I think it is on hold like all Russian orders due to sanctions. The US is only granting waivers for legacy units already in service.
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
New Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
I think it is on hold like all Russian orders due to sanctions. The US is only granting waivers for legacy units already in service.
These are mostly made in HAL India with limited imports of radar, EW, IRST from Russia. I don't see these planes from being stopped by USA sanctions. India will not listen to USA to stop making Su30MKI in India and instead import plane from USA.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
New Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
These are mostly made in HAL India with limited imports of radar, EW, IRST from Russia. I don't see these planes from being stopped by USA sanctions. India will not listen to USA to stop making Su30MKI in India and instead import plane from USA.
US sanctions rain on India-Russia defence parade
By Manu Pubby

Financial sanctions by the US have hit India’s arms trade with Russia hard, with payments for weapons and equipment worth over $2 billion stuck after banks refused to make remittances to Moscow fearing penal action.

With Russia’s flagship arms trading company Rosoboronexport coming under sanctions by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) last month, almost the entire arms trade with India has come to a grinding halt after the State Bank of India put an immediate stop to all payments from April 7.

Consultations are on at the very top levels of the government to resolve the issue, given that critical arms acquisitions and ongoing programmes including submarine building and repairs, missiles and warships cannot move unless a route is found for the remittances.

US sanctions forbid any business ties with entities designated as Specially Designated Nationals (SDN). The penalty for violation could result in closure of all operations with American concerns. This has forced Indian banks to freeze all lines of credit (LoCs) to Russian arms companies.

Payments worth over $100 million have already been blocked in less than a month and the issue will impact trade of over $2 billion in the coming months if not resolved. An Indian public sector bank that was used for making such sensitive payments in the past is being roped in, sources said, but the recent tightening of norms by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) following the Punjab National Bank fraud is coming in the way.



Discussions are on with the Russian side, including with its leading bank in India, , but a solution is yet to be found. Alternative arrangements are also being looked at, including feasibility of the creation of a specialised bank for defence-related payments.

Queries sent to the defence ministry and the State Bank of India were not answered as of press time.

Resolving the payments route is top priority, with the matter being taken up by top government officials, including the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), sources said. The magnitude of the payments can be judged to be critical given the type of programmes that can get stuck.

For instance, the sanctions listing has hit payments to the tune of over $15 million to Russia that would have been used to repair the damaged INS Chakra nuclear submarine that met with an accident in late 2016. The Chakra, which was taken on lease from Russia, damaged its sonar dome and has been non-operational as specialised repairs have to be carried out. The Chakra is India’s only nuclearpowered attack submarine.

On a separate note, a decision has also been taken at the top level of government to request Washington for a waiver from the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) for a deal to purchase the advanced S 400 air defence system from Russia. The proposed $5.5-billion deal is critical for India, which is looking to plug gaps in its air defence network.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ussia-defence-parade/articleshow/64036673.cms
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
New Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
US sanctions rain on India-Russia defence parade
By Manu Pubby

Financial sanctions by the US have hit India’s arms trade with Russia hard, with payments for weapons and equipment worth over $2 billion stuck after banks refused to make remittances to Moscow fearing penal action.

With Russia’s flagship arms trading company Rosoboronexport coming under sanctions by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) last month, almost the entire arms trade with India has come to a grinding halt after the State Bank of India put an immediate stop to all payments from April 7.

Consultations are on at the very top levels of the government to resolve the issue, given that critical arms acquisitions and ongoing programmes including submarine building and repairs, missiles and warships cannot move unless a route is found for the remittances.

US sanctions forbid any business ties with entities designated as Specially Designated Nationals (SDN). The penalty for violation could result in closure of all operations with American concerns. This has forced Indian banks to freeze all lines of credit (LoCs) to Russian arms companies.

Payments worth over $100 million have already been blocked in less than a month and the issue will impact trade of over $2 billion in the coming months if not resolved. An Indian public sector bank that was used for making such sensitive payments in the past is being roped in, sources said, but the recent tightening of norms by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) following the Punjab National Bank fraud is coming in the way.



Discussions are on with the Russian side, including with its leading bank in India, , but a solution is yet to be found. Alternative arrangements are also being looked at, including feasibility of the creation of a specialised bank for defence-related payments.

Queries sent to the defence ministry and the State Bank of India were not answered as of press time.

Resolving the payments route is top priority, with the matter being taken up by top government officials, including the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), sources said. The magnitude of the payments can be judged to be critical given the type of programmes that can get stuck.

For instance, the sanctions listing has hit payments to the tune of over $15 million to Russia that would have been used to repair the damaged INS Chakra nuclear submarine that met with an accident in late 2016. The Chakra, which was taken on lease from Russia, damaged its sonar dome and has been non-operational as specialised repairs have to be carried out. The Chakra is India’s only nuclearpowered attack submarine.

On a separate note, a decision has also been taken at the top level of government to request Washington for a waiver from the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) for a deal to purchase the advanced S 400 air defence system from Russia. The proposed $5.5-billion deal is critical for India, which is looking to plug gaps in its air defence network.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ussia-defence-parade/articleshow/64036673.cms
There will always be ways of bypassing the USA sanctions by using small banks like UCO bank which has very limited operation. Even if UCO bqnk gets sanctioned by USA, there won't be any effect. UCO was used to bypass iran sanctions last time.

Also, India can route the payment in yuan oor other currency indirectly. India could also use kundankulam reactor purchase to mask the payments. USA sanctions can only apply to dollar based transaction directly or indirectly. So, by completely delinking from dollars, India or Indian banks can bypass the sanctions
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kay

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
New Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
There will always be ways of bypassing the USA sanctions by using small banks like UCO bank which has very limited operation. Even if UCO bqnk gets sanctioned by USA, there won't be any effect. UCO was used to bypass iran sanctions last time.

Also, India can route the payment in yuan oor other currency indirectly. India could also use kundankulam reactor purchase to mask the payments. USA sanctions can only apply to dollar based transaction directly or indirectly. So, by completely delinking from dollars, India or Indian banks can bypass the sanctions
I don't see any evidence GoI is trying to bypass the sanctions. I do see them asking for waivers.
 

scatterStorm

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2016
Messages
2,243
Likes
5,360
Country flag
There will always be ways of bypassing the USA sanctions by using small banks like UCO bank which has very limited operation. Even if UCO bqnk gets sanctioned by USA, there won't be any effect. UCO was used to bypass iran sanctions last time.

Also, India can route the payment in yuan oor other currency indirectly. India could also use kundankulam reactor purchase to mask the payments. USA sanctions can only apply to dollar based transaction directly or indirectly. So, by completely delinking from dollars, India or Indian banks can bypass the sanctions
Bypassing could have serious repercussions, but as our foreign ministry have already said ... nothing compares against national interest, especially if it's a matter of national security. If they are sanctioning, we will surely find some other way.
 

StealthFlanker

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
879
Likes
1,213
Country flag
S200, an old version of S400 even hit an Israeli F35, though it was said that F35 still managed to land in Israel with heavy damage. Israel later claimed that F35 hit storks during routine training
except that no S200 hit F-35 whatsoever, it was nothing more than a hoax from a Middle East tabloid (Southfront.org)
Firstly, F-35 in Israrel didn't even reach IOC by the time syrian claimed the attack happened. There was like what, grant total of 7 F-35 in Israel at that time.
Secondly, Syrian claimed there was a direct hit, there is absolutely no chance in hell that a F-35 can survive a 200 kg warhead hitting it at Mach 5, S-200 if managed to hit the F-35 will destroy it, no way that it just only scratch the paint (given that Israrel said the aircraft will return the flight in the next day http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=iw&tl=en&u=http://www.kan.org.il/item/?itemId=23623&sandbox=1
Thirdly, F-35 hit a stock two weeks earlier, not at the same time.

In short, no sane person would believe that, it is the same kind of propaganda when they said Israrel destroyed S-300 battery in syria http://www.businessinsider.com/f-35-combat-mission-syria-2017-4
 
Last edited:

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
New Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
I don't see any evidence GoI is trying to bypass the sanctions. I do see them asking for waivers.
It is a polite way of saying USA that India is not in a mood to oblige the sanctions. It is not exactly a request.

Bypassing could have serious repercussions, but as our foreign ministry have already said ... nothing compares against national interest, especially if it's a matter of national security. If they are sanctioning, we will surely find some other way.
What repercussions? Do you understand that USA is not the allfather? Why should India bother about USA's unilateral sanctions? Is India a USA stooge?

If dollar can't be used with Russia, sonethsomelse will be used.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kay

Immanuel

New Member
Joined
May 16, 2011
Messages
3,605
Likes
7,574
Country flag
S200 hitting F35 may have been coincidence. Also, since F35 was not destroyed, one can say that the hit was from a distance and not direct. Only a small fraction of the warhead hit F35 but even that was enough to ground it permanently
And where did you get this brilliant piece of fiction? Meanwhile the real IAF F-35s are flying around Beirut in broad day light. Please refrain from posting 'Fake News'
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
New Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
And where did you get this brilliant piece of fiction? Meanwhile the real IAF F-35s are flying around Beirut in broad day light. Please refrain from posting 'Fake News'
Israel is suspected to have used stork hit as a cover story for S200 hitting its F35. Syrian minister also claimed that one F35 was hit by S200 and Israel was forced to retreat on the same day.

Here are some links -

https://theaviationist.com/2017/10/...lved-in-a-bird-strike-incident-gets-grounded/

Israel Is Hiding That Its State-Of-Art F-35 Warplane Was Hit By Syrian S-200 ...
https://southfront.org › israel-hiding-state...

https://www.timesofisrael.com/storks-hit-f-35-sending-stealth-jet-to-garage/amp/

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/did-russian-missile-really-hit-israeli-f-35-22926

Overall, there is a good chance that Israeli F35 was indeed hit by S200. One thing is clear - F35 of Israel was hit. The question is whether it was storks or S200 missile. Considering that storks don't fly that high during mid october and that storks generally fly in flocks makes it really suspicious that F35 hit the storks.
 

Sancho

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
1,831
Likes
1,034
the best weapon against a stealth jet is a stealth jet.
That's not correct, since having stealth features doesn't help to detect an enemy stealth fighter!

Stealth is just a way to avoid detection, but the only way to improve detection capabilities, are improved and additional sensors!
That's why the best counter to stealth, is a powerful AWACS aircraft, with additional IRST and EW sensors, for longer range detection of low RCS targets. No fighter sensors can compete with an AWACS or Sigint aircraft, when it comes to sensor performance.

So the best counter to J20 for IAF, would be proper 24/7 AWACS coverage along through north eastern borders, combined with Rafales FSO TV channel (ideally also IRST) + the MICA IR and Meteor combo, but thx to the current government, we neither have adequate numbers of Rafales or AWACS.
 

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
That's why the best counter to stealth, is a powerful AWACS aircraft, with additional IRST and EW sensors, for longer range detection of low RCS targets. No fighter sensors can compete with an AWACS or Sigint aircraft, when it comes to sensor performance.
I beg differences here: Yes, the AWACS can help detect the stealth fighter from larger range and command your own fighter to achieve a optimal position (side or rear) for a surprise attack. However, what you suggest is a tactical solution, there are 2 issues here:
1. Until today, the most, or even all fighters don't have the datalink which is capable for transferring the amount of data necessary to engage the target with great precision. The fighter jets have to rely on their onboard IRST to do the job independently. But stealth fighters generally take measures to reduce their IR signature, so, it is still a big question if fighters under such tactics can have tactical advantage when facing a stealth fighter also equipping with IRST.
2. The tactics is also assuming that stealth fighter has no support from AWACS or ground radar, which is the case for US who is generally in attacking position close to enemy sky. However, in the case of Russia and China, the possible scenario is they will operate close to their own border, in return, it is highly likely, their stealth fighter will receive the radar image from their own AWACS.
 

StealthFlanker

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
879
Likes
1,213
Country flag
Israel is suspected to have used stork hit as a cover story for S200 hitting its F35. Syrian minister also claimed that one F35 was hit by S200 and Israel was forced to retreat on the same day..
As similar to all conspiracy theory, always "suspect", "thought to", "could have" but there isn't any evidence whatsoever. Funny how they think Israel used the bird collision incident as a cover story, Yet in reality, if an F-35 was indeed hit and Israel wanted to keep it a secret, they wouldn't even release any information at all whatsoever. Nevermind that a F-35 hit by S-200 won't return to base, it will disintegrate, period
And honestly, it wouldn't be such a big surprise that Syrian minister jump at the opportunities to spread the propaganda.


Except for southfront.org where the hoax originated from , all others source point out how out of touch this rumor is
https://www.timesofisrael.com/storks-hit-f-35-sending-stealth-jet-to-garage/amp/ report a bird collision
Two storks hit an F-35 fighter jet during a training flight on Tuesday, requiring the plane to undergo maintenance work, the army said.

The birds hit the F-35, called the “Adir” in Hebrew, just before it was due to return to the Nevatim air base in the central Negev desert.

The army said the plane landed normally and that it did not sustain damage.

However, it was sent “for maintenance work as is common after impacts like this,” the IDF said in an email.

The army said the F-35 fighter jet, one of the seven currently in Israel’s possession, is expected to return to service in the next few days.
https://theaviationist.com/2017/10/...lved-in-a-bird-strike-incident-gets-grounded/ literally said this
In fact, the Syrian Defense Ministry said in its statement that government forces responded to the violation of the airspace and “directly hit one of the jets, forcing [Israeli aircraft] to retreat.” On the other side the Israeli denied any aircraft was hit by the Syrian air defenses (S-200 battery) and this sounds quite reasonable considered that the Israeli have often shown their ability to operate freely in the Syrian airspace and there would have been no reason to disclose a fake birdstrike at all to cover a Syrian hit.
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/did-russian-missile-really-hit-israeli-f-35-22926v said
......
However, the evidence cited by Southfront seems rather tenuous. .......

Southfront didn’t explain why the Israeli Air Force would feel a need to release a photo of a damaged stealth aircraft. As U.S. defense websiteThe Drive points out, the F-35 is just entering Israeli service now, and wouldn’t likely be flying missions over Syria just yet unless there was some kind of emergency (and Israel has plenty of F-15s and F-16s to handle those right now). Nor is it optimized for the kind of photographic reconnaissance missions that Israel flies over Lebanon.
Overall, there is a good chance that Israeli F35 was indeed hit by S200.
No there isn't. It is laughable, almost a child dream but far from reality. Like I said, this is nothing more than a hoax, basically, the same sh..t when they said S-300 battery was destroyed by F-35
http://www.businessinsider.com/f-35-combat-mission-syria-2017-4
Hell, if someone is deluded enough to believe this kind of hoax then they may as well believe Qaher-313 is a world beater.
Considering that storks don't fly that high during mid october and that storks generally fly in flocks makes it really suspicious that F35 hit the storks.
Stork can be anywhere within 0-16000 ft, it is entirely possible for an aircraft to hit them. There isn't any indication about the altitude when the collision happened either, heck you don't even know what altitude or what sort of training mission they were flying, if they were flying BFM or deep penetration then a collision with some bird is nothing out of ordinary.
 

Articles

Top