......................
Only parachutes are found, hopes are still ON
Tree Canopy they said is very thick and a para drop could hurt the rescuers.Why it is taking IAF this long to send some rescuers to the crash site when every minute counts? I thought with IAF Apache or Chinook helicopters it will be easy to lower rescuers to the crash site very quickly. The pilots could be injured and need medical help. The slow IAF response is very disconcerting!
1. IAF don't have Apache & Chinooks as of now.Why it is taking IAF this long to send some rescuers to the crash site when every minute counts? I thought with IAF Apache or Chinook helicopters it will be easy to lower rescuers to the crash site very quickly. The pilots could be injured and need medical help. The slow IAF response is very disconcerting!
I am sure but how long is that supposed to take?Tree Canopy they said is very thick and a para drop could hurt the rescuers.
So they have to walk through unwalked terrains to reach them..may be
Tree Canopy they said is very thick and a para drop could hurt the rescuers.
So they have to walk through unwalked terrains to reach them..may be
Not really. Think shortwave radio. Even if we think of line of sight, satellites should help (weather permitting)AFAIK, radio communication is Line of Sight based. So won't it be pretty unreliable in mountainous region where the topographical conditions consist of pretty steep gradients all around.
If true, I'd say its actually good news. The enemy revealed their cards early. Had this happened in war time, entire fleets would have been rendered useless.I saw a news of SU-30 crashing because of electronic interference. If true it is very serious concern.
http://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/9573-sukhoi-likely-downed-cyber-weapons
Theres some news floating around..I saw a news of SU-30 crashing because of electronic interference. If true it is very serious concern.
http://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/9573-sukhoi-likely-downed-cyber-weapons
How did the guy who wrote the article come to the conclusion that the pilots must have found it difficult as the search for the pilots are still on .This may explain why even the pilots may have found it difficult to activate safety ejection mechanisms, once it became obvious that the aircraft was in serious trouble, as such mechanisms too could have been crippled by computer malfunctions induced from an outside source.
No trace... could they have been abducted by insurgents?http://english.mathrubhumi.com/amp/...ongings-found-indian-army-air-force-1.1976529
Sukhoi crash: Pilot's blood-stained shoe, other belongings found
Can't really judge the quality of the system in the hands of the Arabs though.And about the S400, those things are utter crap. Remember USA strikes on Syrian air base
S-400 range against cruise missiles is 400km if CMs not fly behind mountain terrain.Please stop the S-400/ Syria issue. The S-400s were deployed to protect the Russian AFB. Against cruise missiles their max range is 25km. The only defences around Sharyat AFB were some SA-6 launchers comprising a single battery. This has been verified from satellite imagery. Unless the Russians were providing complete airspace surveillance of Syria (which they are not), we cannot judge any of their modern systems. What is curious is that there was no AAA around the base and not a single SA-6 was launched.