- Joined
- Aug 14, 2015
- Messages
- 1,419
- Likes
- 2,819
The first thing we need to consider is the fact that Indian Army plans to raise an entire corps for Amphibious warfare. Currently it only has one brigade tasked for such missions. Considering the LHDs (Landing Helicopter Docks).......no, now that they are in the 40,000 tons range, they are more likely to be LHAs (Landing Helicopter Assault). So considering these accretions in size of the amphibious landing force, even these 4 LHAs will not be able to carry an entire corps sized formation within them.Wasp or America have a sense if u have F-35B (or some old AV-8 Harrier or another VSTOL aircraft) and the ship is deployed for months, otherwise a pure LHD 20,000 tons ship like the Mistral is unbeatable.
America and Wasp class have a complement of 1050/1250 people, America class has 5 milions liter of JP-5 (aviation fuel) mainly for her AV-8 now (and F-35B in future... the Italian light carrier Cavour with 12 AV-8 and 12 medium helos with 1.5 milion liter of JP-5 (and relative weapons) has a endurance in combat for 20/30 days)... the Mistral class has a complement of 177 people... India (as Italy or Japan) have 0 (ZERO) overseas deployment and 0 (ZERO) overseas territories and 0 (ZERO) overseas interests.
India navy have the logistic chain for support the landing of 2000 men from a 40,000 ton LHD?
For India, Italy, Japan the on board naval aviation is mainly for fleet protection... India have the big problem that dont have VSTOL as F-35B so the minimum size of a carrier is around 40,000 tons, but that its all.
If India have access to the F-35B probable the best solution is a fleet of 4-5 LHA/LHD 30,000 ton (40-50 F-35B on board) double use similar to italian LHA + the 2 already build carriers... or a fleet of 3 carrier 40,000/60,000 tons and 3-4 LHD/LPD around 20,000/25,000 tons... there are no space for 40,000 tons LHD.
But wait, why is Indian Navy seeking these LHAs under the title "Multi-Role Support Vessel"?
This can only mean that they do not plan to create ARGs (Amphibious Ready Groups) centered around these vessels, rather they will attach them to existing CVBGs (Carrier Battle Groups). This makes sense because Indian Navy does not have the requisite number of destroyers and frigates to be able to field these in separate ARGs. Hence we can conclude that these ships are not planned to carry any VTOL(Vertical Take-off and Landing) fighter jet. The fighter cover will instead be provided by the fleet carrier. The large deck will be utilised for a greater helicopter force that will enable a bigger helicopter assault task force.
I agree, it does not seem rational with the number of destroyers and cruisers we have. But these ships are most likely to be attached to an existing fleet rather than have a new fleet centered around them.40000 tons is specified in Naval RFP, not my wishlist. I too don't understand the rationale behind it, but that's what it is.
PS: India still operates British Sea Harriers.
British Sea Harriers are on their last legs. Rather they are crawling on all fours and begging retirement. They will be retired next year with R22.