@JBH22 @opesys
well no i siad so because every indian from the past many years is busy saying that we will go to war if anything like mumbai attack happened..despite the fact that itis nt proved that whether GOP was officially involved in this or not.
how they got into the mega city that too through a boat with guns loaded.and what not
It has been proved beyond doubt that Pakistan Govt and ISI was involved in the Mumbai carnage.
It is just that Pakistan lives in denial. That is also an established fact.
There is the usual lament from Pakistan that it is bearing the maximum brunt of terrorism. Sure it is. But Pakistan conveniently forgets the fact that the monster was the creation of Pakistan and Zia. Pakistan creates the monster and then laments that this monster is tearing apart Pakistan. Don't you think that is weird and some sort of deluding oneself in total denial?
Pakistanis forget the Bibilical injunsction – As Ye Sow, So Shall Ye Reap.
You are merely reaping the short sighted vision of Zia, replicated by the Pakistanis of not being able to see beyond their nose. If Pakistan than thought it through, they would have realised that the terrorism that they had created in its womb will be biting the hand that fed them i.e. Pakistan!
I hope you are aware that in the Pakistan courts, prosecution has commenced that has indicated where the terrorists were trained to include using of the boats.
Therefore, the evidence was given and it is beyond doubt that Pakistanis were behind the whole carnage.
leaving this
the reason i said so was that Pakistan is killing 2-3 soldiers everymonths from india since the past many years.
nothing as such happened
as i told you guys..guts is something one need to have to attack a country sitting on nuclear threshold with megatons of warheads,7lac bigger army,thousands of tanks,decent air force,sea based second strike capability within a short period.capable of delivering nukes from air and land and soon sea,
tell me how will your forces advance into pak when the border itself is protected by thousands or more than 1 lac soldiers wth batteries of nasr missile and a-100 mrbl in hand,more than 500 al khalid on border
i mean this is too silly.
In so far as guts are concerned, be not under the fond delusion that one Pakistan equals 10 Indians. In every war, you have been shown what the proof of the pudding is. And 1971 told you how gutsy 90,000 PsW proved of Pakistan!
How will India take on Pakistan with what it has in the form of the military? Time will only tell as it has been telling every time.
However, India does not have the proprietary rights to lunacy as Pakistan has and so we don't attack out of pique.
And we have to prove nothing to Pakistan. We are way ahead in all departments.
wasnt india too worried when in 2002 pak was even supppose to use nukes?running to the west?
Are you confusing Main Nawaz Sharif to be an India running to Bill Clinton and knocking at the gates on 4 July – the US Indpendence Day, when Clinton wanted to have a well deserved break?
you guys should be happy we didnt had musharaf bt coward like zardari in service.otherwise the reply to indian warnining would be alot different
Yes Musharraf was a brave man.
He got Pakistan's nose rubbed in the mud internationally with his cockananny harebrained operation that had to logistic back up and left his soldiers who infiltrated with supplies, medevac and so on once the Indian riposte started.
certainly i think the period around 2009-10 was the best time for india if they really were suppose to go for a limited scale war with pak.
or any period under this govt.bt they lost the opportunity
imran khan or nawaz are both bad guys.
No.
India is not a crazy hashish driven nation that embarks on war just because they have to prove a point or because the PM got out on the wrong side of his bed!
India has proved the point many a time when Pakistan attacked.
It has been put there by a Pakistani.
What do you expect to be said?
You seem to have missed out this:
The neutrality of this article is disputed.Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (January 2012 )