Pakistan political discussions

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
showing the real manhood ha ha ha

http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=21464

LAHORE: The Police Training School, Manawan, once again echoed with gunshots on Friday night after security guards fired shots into the air, suspecting a video-maker at the rooftop of an adjacent building for a terrorist.
After hearing the gunshots, all the recruits rushed out of the school to protect their lives, taking shelter in neighbouring houses. The firing, which started at 8:15 pm, continued for about half an hour.
After all for this only they are trained ha ha ha
He claimed that if the security guards had fired at the unidentified person, they must have been killed. He said he, along with some other recruits, was sitting on the ground when they heard some mysterious sounds from the bathrooms’ side. “And within seconds, the firing started, which created panic and all the recruits left the school,” he added.
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
guys check this now Russia is also getting worried and with Mr. Putin in charge.....................

http://www.ptinews.com/pti\ptisite.nsf/0/5DECB3633306E1196525759500283C7A?OpenDocument

Russia considers Pakistan its principal nuclear threat: Expert



Lalit K Jha
Washington, Apr 11 (PTI) Describing Pakistan as the "principal" nuclear threat to Russia, an eminent foreign policy and security expert has claimed that Moscow would support any US endeavour to take away Islamabad's atomic weapons in case of any destabilisation in the Islamic nation.

"Russian authorities for many years have been indicating that Pakistan was a much more serious problem, both for nuclear proliferation and for nuclear terrorism, than Iran," Alexei Arbatov, Chairman of the Non-Proliferation Programme of Carnegie Moscow Centre, said at a recent seminar here.

"Russia has been living already for more than a decade within reach of Pakistani nuclear missiles and without any means to defend against them. So Russia considered and considers Pakistan to be the principal threat from the point of view of nuclear proliferation," he said.

Arbatov was a member of the Russian Parliament from 1994 to 2003 and Deputy Chairman of the Defence Committee. Author of several books, he is also a member of the Advisory Council to the Foreign Minister and heads a panel on strategic planning for the Scientific Board of the Security Council of Russian Federation. PTI
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
guys check this now Russia is also getting worried and with Mr. Putin in charge.....................

http://www.ptinews.com/pti\ptisite.nsf/0/5DECB3633306E1196525759500283C7A?OpenDocument

Russia considers Pakistan its principal nuclear threat: Expert



Lalit K Jha
Washington, Apr 11 (PTI) Describing Pakistan as the "principal" nuclear threat to Russia, an eminent foreign policy and security expert has claimed that Moscow would support any US endeavour to take away Islamabad's atomic weapons in case of any destabilisation in the Islamic nation.

"Russian authorities for many years have been indicating that Pakistan was a much more serious problem, both for nuclear proliferation and for nuclear terrorism, than Iran," Alexei Arbatov, Chairman of the Non-Proliferation Programme of Carnegie Moscow Centre, said at a recent seminar here.

"Russia has been living already for more than a decade within reach of Pakistani nuclear missiles and without any means to defend against them. So Russia considered and considers Pakistan to be the principal threat from the point of view of nuclear proliferation," he said.

Arbatov was a member of the Russian Parliament from 1994 to 2003 and Deputy Chairman of the Defence Committee. Author of several books, he is also a member of the Advisory Council to the Foreign Minister and heads a panel on strategic planning for the Scientific Board of the Security Council of Russian Federation. PTI
 

mehwish92

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
568
Likes
112
Country flag
From The Sunday Times
April 12, 2009

Our armchair jihadists

After being shot, Sami Yousafzai fled Pakistan for London, thinking he was escaping Islamic extremism. He was shocked by the menacing support for the Taliban he found here

I still don’t know who wanted me dead. I’d been sitting in my car one day last November, not far from my house in the northwest Pakistan city of Peshawar, when a group of strangers walked up. One of them pointed a pistol through my window.

I remember that he wore a turban and shalwar kameez – the tunic and baggy pants common in the area – and that he had a long beard, dyed red with henna.

He shot me in the chest, hand and arm and then fled with his friends.

Miraculously, none of the bullets hit any arteries or vital organs. As soon as a doctor had patched me up, I booked a flight to London, where I planned to lie low for a while to rest and seek further medical help for a bullet that was lodged in my arm.

Related Links
Ghost in the terror machine
But more than that, I just wanted to be somewhere calm and safe, far from AK-toting gunmen, the suicide bombers and the daily, random violence of Pakistan’s borderlands.

My sense of relief at being in London didn’t last long. In one of the city’s many south Asian neighbourhoods I saw a tall young Afghan who reminded me of my would-be assassin, striding down the street like a bad dream. He, too, had a long beard and wore a shalwar kameez plus a big, loose turban of white silk.

Anyone dressed like that in Islam-abad would immediately have been picked up for questioning by the police. I had flown halfway across the world to get away from killers who resembled this young Londoner. I stared after him until he was gone from view.

But as the days passed I spotted him again and again. He stood out even in a neighbourhood full of Asians dressed in traditional garb. The locals had a nickname for him: “Talib Jan”. It’s a friendly Afghan slang term for a Taliban member, rather like GI Joe for Americans.

The crowded, run-down terraced houses in this area and others like it have become home to hundreds of Afghans who arrived in England as fugitives from the Taliban’s brutality. Nevertheless, most of Jan’s neighbours spoke of him tolerantly or even approvingly.

In fact, during my three-month stay in England I met a surprising number of Muslims who shared Jan’s fascination with the Taliban. The older generation had little love for the extremists. But among some younger men, frustrated and marginalised in British society, I discovered a fury that was depressingly familiar.

Many immigrants were blatant, vocal and unquestioning in their support for what they imagined to be “jihad”. Few seemed troubled by the brutality that had characterised the reign of Mullah Mohammed Omar, the Taliban leader, or by his banning of music or of education for girls.

Indeed, many looked back on Omar’s rule as a kind of Islamic utopia and eagerly snapped up the Islamist leaflets handed out after Friday prayers at various mosques.

I introduced myself to Jan at one of those mosques and complimented him on his taste in clothes: that’s how people dress back home in Afghanistan, I said. (I was born in northern Afghanistan; my family fled to Pakistan in 1979 to escape the Soviet invasion.)

Despite his fierce appearance, Jan turned out to be friendly and outgoing. He listened with interest to my story, but mostly he talked about himself, his Islamist views, his fierce support for the Taliban and his contempt for the Brits and Americans fighting them.

His vehemence surprised me. Now 23 years old, Jan had been born in eastern Afghanistan and attended a madrasah in Pakistan. The Taliban were still ruling Afghanistan when his parents paid a people-smuggler to sneak him to England at 14.

There he applied for political asylum, claiming the Taliban had persecuted him and his family. Now, of course, he’s a legal resident yet openly cheers for his supposed oppressors to defeat troops from his adopted homeland. The irony seems lost on him.

In London he prowls the streets as a one-man, self-appointed morality patrol. He castigates any young Muslim couples whom he sees holding hands in public and he criticises acquaintances for shaping their beards into what he disapprovingly calls a “French cut” that frames the mouth.

His diatribes can be frightening. Several young men told me they were afraid Jan had friends who could create problems for them or their relatives in Afghanistan or Pakistan. Some feared they might be disowned if Jan got word to their families about their “immoral” lives in London.

At a neighbourhood restaurant one day, I noticed that my waiter looked miserable. Khalil, a clean-shaven, broad-shouldered young Afghan who wears a gold ring in one earlobe, told me that he’d been dumped a few days earlier by his girlfriend, a beautiful young Englishwoman.

They’d been out walking when Talib Jan marched up and began denouncing Khalil, threatening to let his family back in Afghanistan know that their son was having a forbidden affair.

The girl was frightened by Jan, but more than that, she was furious at Khalil for lying to her: he had told her he was Turkish. She told him they were through.

Now Khalil worries that same routine will be repeated with every girl he meets. He’s also convinced that Jan knows how to find his family in Afghanistan and can make big trouble for him there.

“I wanted to marry that girl, but now I have no hope,” he told me. “My family lives in the insecure countryside. If I go back and the Taliban know I have an English girlfriend, they will behead me.”

I asked if he thought Jan was a member of the Taliban. “No,” Khalil answered. “He is not with the militias, but he is a big headache for every Afghan who knows him.”

As far as I can tell, Jan is an armchair jihadist. Certainly I saw no sign that he had direct ties to the Taliban, or that anyone was paying him to proselytise. On the contrary, he works hard to support himself with business deals – such as buying and selling used cars.

I often found him in a little shop that sells mobile phones and watches. A crowd of young bearded men hang out there: more armchair jihadists.

The shop’s 35-year-old owner, a Pakistani from Peshawar, loves to show them the latest Taliban videos on his mobile phone, featuring beheadings of alleged antiTaliban “spies” and ambushes of US forces.

When asked if he was worried the authorities might discover his collection of videos, he told me: “If our Taliban brothers can stand up to B-52 bombing and modern US war technology, it would be cowardly of me to be afraid to watch and share their heroic actions.”

The shopkeeper disturbed me: he is relatively well educated and a former banker, yet makes no secret of his Islamist leanings. Giving change, he avoids touching a woman’s hand.

He also claims that in his days as a radical religious student in Peshawar in the mid1990s, he and a group of friends murdered several prostitutes in what he calls a “moral cleansing drive”. (This may or may not be true.) He warned me about speaking against the Taliban, even in London: people’s loved ones at home could get hurt, he said darkly.

Jan, too, is always glad to pull out his Bluetooth-enabled mobile phone and share videos of Taliban training camps and coalition convoys hit by IEDs. He even has Taliban ringtones – fire-and-brimstone sermons and Koranic recitals from jihadist mullahs. If you want copies, he’ll transfer them to your phone or point you to the right website.

“I’m winning converts to a holy cause every day,” he says. As for the police, Jan says he’s never had problems with them. They seem to regard him as a deeply religious man, he says, or at least as a harmless eccentric.

In fact, Jan embodies a powerful need among many young Muslims in Britain to preserve a sense of identity in a foreign land.

One 50-year-old engineer told me he worries constantly about his four children – particularly his two sons, aged 19 and 20. They seem addicted to internet porn, he says, but what scares him even more is the amount of time they spend on jihadist websites. He worries as well about extremist operatives who hang out at local mosques, trying to recruit young people to the Taliban cause.

The appeal of extremism is especially strong for immigrants fed up with hard times and bigotry.

In Birmingham I met an unemployed man from Kandahar who said he’d just lost his job and feared he wouldn’t be able to feed his family.

“If I get hit by a car or bus one day crossing the street, who will look after my family?” he asked. “It would be better for me to go and fight and die with the Taliban. Then at least I could see paradise.”

One 35-year-old British Muslim, an office worker, told me he was infuriated by widespread discrimination. He hadn’t had a promotion in 10 years, he said, and he believes this is because he’s an ardent Muslim who has a long beard and never joins his colleagues at the pub.

“This kind of behaviour is what makes Muslims extremist,” he said.

Jan himself says most Britons look on him with “love and kindness”, but others occasionally stare at him with “hate” and won’t sit next to him on the train.

Most of these young men, even Jan, will probably never give up their lives in Britain to join the jihad in Afghanistan. But something of that far-off fight, some tinge of blood and chaos and hatred, has certainly seeped into the streets of London.

Alokozai, 27, arrived in the city a year ago after an arduous trip via the Afghans’ underground network. He used to be an interpreter/fixer for British troops in Kandahar. The pay was excellent by Afghan standards – some $1,600 a month – but then the death threats began. His family’s lives would be worthless unless he left his job, the anonymous letters warned.

He quit. In Britain he applied for political asylum, thinking he had finally escaped the Taliban’s wrath. Then the phone woke him one night at 3am. “Death angels will soon clutch at your throat,” an Afghan voice warned. “Remember, we have Islamic brothers in the UK. Your family should not rest easy in Kandahar, either.”

He says he could only listen to the voice, too scared to say anything himself.

Now Alokozai worries all the time. Too many Afghans in London sympathise with the Taliban, he says. He thinks many recent asylum seekers, especially those from southern Afghanistan, have ties to the Taliban and remain under the sway of extremist ideas. “They will create trouble for Britain in the near future,” he predicts.

Equally disturbing to him are the thoroughly assimilated Muslims, who also treat him like a traitor to his religion. When they find out he worked for British forces in Afghanistan, they ask him: “How many houses did you bomb?” And: “How many innocents did you kill?”

“These people are as narrow-minded and have as much hate in their eyes as the Taliban do in Afghanistan,” he says. “I cannot understand how these Afghans and Pakistanis can wear western clothes, dance and drink and then condemn me and see the Taliban as their heroes.”

Neither can I. On a train one day I met Owais, a 27-year-old Pakistani from Kashmir, who began praising the Taliban and talking seriously of going to live in Afghanistan after Mullah Omar returned to power.

“My fervent wish is that, next winter, we may be able to breathe freely in the restored Islamic state of Afghanistan,” he declared in Urdu.

Here you can breathe freely, too, I told him.

At this point his travelling companion butted in. “No, only in a true Islamic state can we be free,” said Ishaq, a 25-year-old Afghan immigrant who was wearing a long white tunic over his jeans. “The West is destroying the spirit, soul and values of Islam. Muslims should avoid contact with the West.”

As I go home to my family, I too wonder and worry about such men. There is too much of Peshawar in them – and in London.

© Newsweek 2009
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...akistan-the-epicentre-of-Islamist-terror.html

Some 70 miles north of Lahore, in a 200-acre camp that also houses a large mosque, swimming pool and fish farm, volunteers are taught how to assemble bombs, fire weapons, create terrorist networks and communicate covertly using the internet and mobile phones.

They are also instructed in resistance to interrogation techniques and how to create cover stories in the event of being captured.

This is the headquarters of the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) – which in Urdu translates as "army of the pure" – the organisation widely believed to be responsible for the Mumbai massacre in November which left 172 people dead.
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Pakistan militants torch Afghan supplies

PESHAWAR, Pakistan, April 12 (Reuters) - Taliban militants set fire on Sunday to 10 container trucks carrying supplies to Western forces in Afghanistan in a pre-dawn attack near the Pakistani city of Peshawar, police said.

Islamist militants stepped up attacks on supplies trucked through Pakistan into land-locked Afghanistan last year, exposing the vulnerability of a vital transport link for U.S. and other foreign troops battling the Taliban.

The attacks have also highlighted the Pakistani government's loss of control to the Taliban of a growing part of the northwest.

The attackers on Sunday drove unopposed to two transport depots on the outskirts of Peshawar, capital of North West Frontier Province, near the Afghan border.

"They first disarmed the terminal guards and then threw petrol bombs," said police officer Waris Khan.

As the militants were withdrawing, police turned up and there was a brief exchange of fire in which two truck drivers were wounded, he said.

Khan said the trucks were taking cement to Afghanistan.

The route from Peshawar up to the Afghan border through the Khyber Pass is the most important of two routes through Pakistan.

Because of the increase in militant attacks, the United States has been trying to find new supply routes.

The United States said in March it expected soon to finalise an agreement with Tajikistan that would allow the transit of non-lethal supplies to Afghanistan.
 

johnee

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
3,473
Likes
499
ha ha....
he is saying that british raj was better. I guess its time for india to relieve the misery of west pak, just like we did to east pak back in 1971.
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
chilling

http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=172210

The people of Swat owe an explanation from the Pakistani army and the government of the NWFP. Would the army care to explain why its commander in Swat was offering namaz behind the terrorists who killed soldiers of the army and policemen? Would the ANP government care to explain why its senior-level government servants pray behind a terrorist who killed civilians in the very constituency that elected the ANP to power? It is also pertinent to mention that police in Swat have registered at least 60 cases related to suicide bombings, kidnappings, attacks on civilians, police and armed forces and damage to public and private property against Fazlullah.
 

musalman

پاکستان زنده باد
Regular Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Messages
923
Likes
135
Country flag
now what is this:

The Hindu News Update Service

Stop Sharia laws, kick out Taliban nomads: Miss Pakistan World

Toronto (IANS): Denouncing the Sharia laws in Pakistan's Swat Valley as surrender before terrorists, Miss Pakistan World Natasha Paracha said on Monday that the world should pressure Pakistan to stop implementation of rigid Islamic laws.

The 23-year-year-old Islamabad-born Paracha, who won the 2008 beauty pageant in Toronto last year, told IANS: "I cannot bear to see that the people who have burnt down schools are being heeded to.

"These nomads (the Taliban) coming from the Middle East and other countries are taking over our nation. I strongly urge the United Nations to intervene and help the Pakistani government tackle these forces and throw them out.

"The world has to put pressure on the Pakistani government to stop the Sharia Law enforcement."

She said: "The government should never compromise with terrorists. We cannot have basic rights taken away from women."

Paracha, who is a graduate of the University of California in Berkeley, said she feared that "if they have the Sharia Law imposed in the Swat Valley then, it will spread to the whole of Pakistan. Rigid Islamic laws are not a solution for Pakistan and Pakistanis".

She added: "Pakistan should be a secular Muslim nation and the constitution of Pakistan should be followed throughout the country."

Toronto-based Sonia Ahmed, who started the beauty pageant for Pakistani girls from around the world in 2002, said: "It is disappointing to see that President (Asif Ali) Zardari has proved himself wrong just in the first year. It is a shame that people who are not even Pakistanis (Taliban) are running Pakistan.

"In the 1970s, a similar situation occurred when the fanatics closed down casinos, cabarets and bars as well as enforced chadar or veil for women. I am sorry to say that Pakistan was much better during military rule as compared to this sorry state of democracy."


Calling the implementation of Sharia laws beginning of the downfall of Pakistan, she said: "This act of compromise by the Pakistani government clearly shows that it is a failed nation. Taliban has no place in Pakistan and the people of Pakistan should kick them out. They are invaders and barbaric people."

Blaming the Taliban for spoiling India-Pakistan relations, she said: "They were unhappy to see Pakistan and India in peace and had to do whatever they could to ruin the relations that were between the two countries.

"Instead of driving the Taliban out of the country, the government is allowing them to do as they please."

By his action, Sonia Ahmed added, President Zardari is paving the way for a military coup. "In just one year, Pakistanis are fed up with his actions and false promises."
Who is she? There is no such things as Miss Pakistan World
 

musalman

پاکستان زنده باد
Regular Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Messages
923
Likes
135
Country flag
the present Miss Pakistan World Natasha Paracha
Miss Pakistan World

the last 6 Miss Pakistan World:-



Ghar main beth ker bani hoin gi, otherwise there is no such thing as Miss Pakistan. People will kill them if they organize such events in Pakistan.
 

mehwish92

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
568
Likes
112
Country flag
Ghar main beth ker bani hoin gi, otherwise there is no such thing as Miss Pakistan. People will kill them if they organize such events in Pakistan.
Most Miss Pakistans aren't even from Pakistan; they're usually Americans/Canadians of Pakistani origin.
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
excellent read:

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/14/a-nuclear-talibanistan/

BLANKLEY: A nuclear Talibanistan?
U.S. temporizes and hopes for the best

Our view of Pakistan's role in the Afghanistan war has undergone an ominous but necessary series of shifts. At the outset of the war in October 2001, Pakistan correctly was seen as a necessary ally - both politically and geographically - as the primary conduit for our entry and lines of communication into Afghanistan.

Over the years, we came to understand that Pakistan's intelligence service was playing a double game - helping us, but also supporting the Taliban, while Pakistan's northern area had become a safe haven for both the Taliban and al Qaeda.

Thus, Pakistan came to be seen as part of the problem that the Obama administration reasonably has taken to calling the “AfPak” war. Gen. David H. Petraeus told a Senate committee that he saw Pakistan and Afghanistan as “a single theater.”

Now another perception shift is starting to take hold: The increasing instability of the Pakistani government makes Pakistan - more than Afghanistan - the central challenge of our AfPak policy.

Last week, David Kilcullen, a former Australian army officer who was Gen. Petraeus' senior counterinsurgency strategist and is now a consultant to the Obama White House, said Pakistan could collapse within months.

“We have to face the fact that if Pakistan collapses, it will dwarf anything we have seen so far in whatever we're calling the war on terror now,”
he said.

Mr. Kilcullen said time was running out for international efforts to pull both countries back from the brink. “You just can't say that you're not going to worry about al Qaeda taking control of Pakistan and its nukes ... the Kabul tail was wagging the dog,” he said.

Afghanistan was a campaign to defend a reconstruction program. “It's not really about al Qaeda. Afghanistan doesn't worry me. Pakistan does,” Mr. Kilcullen said. He said maybe we can manage Afghanistan and Richard Holbrooke can cut an international deal, but there is also a chance that Washington will fail to stabilize Afghanistan, Pakistan will collapse and al Qaeda will end up running what he called “Talibanistan.”

“This is not acceptable. You can't have al Qaeda in control of Pakistan's missiles,” he said.

“It's too early to tell which way it will go. We'll start to know about July. That's the peak fighting season ... and a month from the Afghan presidential election.”

Gen. Petraeus himself recently said that “extremists ... pose a truly existential threat to [Pakistan].”

The radical Islamist threat to the already weak and unstable Pakistani government has become acute because of reconciliation of former adversaries: Mullah Omar (leader of the Taliban fighters who have left Afghanistan for their new stronghold in Quetta, the capital of Pakistan's Baluchistan province) and Baitullah Mehsud (leader of the Pakistani Taliban in the tribal regions along the border with Afghanistan).

According to last week's Der Speigel, “In late February, flyers written in Urdu turned up in the Pakistani-Afghan border region announcing the formation of a new platform for jihad. The Shura Ittihad-ul Mujahideen (SIM), or Council of United Holy Warriors, declared that the alliance of all militants had been formed at the request of Mullah Omar and [Osama] bin Laden.

”There is a new quality to this .... These groups are now the Pakistani face of al Qaeda,” the German newsmagazine reported.


The problem is that the united radical Islamists are expanding the combat zone inside Pakistan, threatening the state itself. Our drone attacks on the united Taliban (and al Qaeda) are driving the radicals deeper into Pakistan, including its major cities. Also, the attacks inevitably also kill Pakistani women and children (or are claimed by the radicals to have done so), which serves as a recruiting tool for new jihadists.

Thus Mr. Kilcullen was quoted by Der Speigel: “I am against the drone attacks. Even if we could kill half of the al Qaeda leaders, what does it help us if we cause an uprising by the population of Pakistan?”

Mr. Kilcullen's quote raises the strong inference that because the Obama administration has increased the George W. Bush administration's level of drone attacks into Pakistan and Gen. Petraeus' top counterinsurgency adviser publicly opposes the attacks, there must be a major policy fight going on within the administration.

Military strategy disputes are understandable. We have no good choices. Because of the overstretched condition of our military, we have too few troops available to deal with Pakistan, which itself has an active and reserve military manpower of 1.4 million.

Yet Pakistan's military seems insufficient to deal with the radical Islamists. After the Taliban took over the Swat Valley in the middle of Pakistan, seized an emerald mine to help finance their war with America and Pakistan, and established Shariah law, the Pakistani government was so weak it accepted a cease-fire with Maulana Fazlullah, a local thug and terrorist.

With our own Army too small, our NATO allies unwilling to help and Gen. Petraeus' senior counterinsurgency adviser worried that the Taliban and al Qaeda may be able to take over nuclear Pakistan, we are left with a policy of temporizing and crossing our fingers.

Tony Blankley is the author of “American Grit: What It Will Take to Survive and Win in the 21st Century” and vice president of the Edelman public relations firm in Washington.
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
hmmm so all the bravado of no conditions and all was a charade

March of the Taliban

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect.../columnists/kamran-shafi-march-of-the-taliban

There is a great furore going on in our self-righteous media about how Pakistan will not accept aid under any conditionality. In the first place it will starve, which isn’t a bad idea at all considering that our brass hats will come crashing down to reality; in the second, let’s see if we have a country by then!
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009/04/15/story_15-4-2009_pg1_4

Meanwhile, Qazi courts began functioning in Swat with full legal powers. The courts had started functioning on March 12 in six tehsils of Swat, but had limited authority.

However, the new qazi courts would not hear cases against the Taliban, The Associated Press quoted the TNSM chief as telling a private TV channel. “We intend to bury the past,” he {TNSM Chief Sufi Muhammad} said.
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,308
http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009/04/16/story_16-4-2009_pg3_2

comment: After the flogging —Suroosh Irfani

The leaders of Wahhabi-Salafi movements such as Al Qaeda, Lashkar-e Tayyaba and Jama’at-ud Dawa are not trained jurists but “engineers or medical doctors”. Such self-proclaimed jurists have reduced Islam to a combustible mix of intolerance, hatred and isolationist arrogance

Whatever the outcome of the public outrage that the Taliban’s flogging of an alleged adulteress in Swat gave rise to earlier this month, the incident illustrates the deep split in Pakistan over what it means to be a Muslim.

While many critics termed the flogging barbaric and an affront to Islam, the Taliban and their supporters justified the flogging, and insisted it accorded with sharia law. Critics contested this claim by noting that the Taliban’s understanding of sharia law negated the basic requirements of the sharia the Taliban claimed to uphold.


Sharia law lays down rigorous requirements for ascertaining the facts of a case, and the procedures for administering punishment. Moreover, the immaculate moral character required of the four witnesses for confirming penetration are so meticulous that even former Chief Justice of Pakistan Syed Sajjad Ali Shah reportedly said he doubted if he could measure up to the sublime standards of virtue required of a witness in such a case.

While the debate is bound to continue, it is important to note that the spontaneous outrage that swept across several Pakistani cities after the flogging video was aired reflects the first nationwide condemnation of the Taliban. Indeed, the young woman’s screams under Taliban blows were a stark reminder of blown up schools, beheaded bodies, suicide bombings, and a million people forced out of Swat over the last sixteen months — a track record of barbarism that won Swat for the Taliban.

However, the basic paradox that underpins the Taliban’s sharia remains unresolved: the intimidation and violence leading to its enforcement is an outright negation of the Islamic spirit itself. Therefore, the MQM’s abstention from voting on the Nizam-e Adl Regulation in parliament on April 13 is justified.

Moreover, Sufi Muhammad, leader of the Tehreek-e Nifaz-e Shariat-e Muhammadi, who now controls Swat, might well have a very different understanding of sharia from that of trained Islamic jurists. The latter view sharia as “the sum total of technical, legal methodologies, precedents, and decisions”, where the interaction of hadith with legal methodology to produce jurisprudence is an ongoing process.

However, rather than a trained jurist’s sharia, Sufi Muhammad’s sharia seems an all purpose kit, doling out instant punishments, foreswearing introspection, and a refusal to acknowledge the wrongs one has been a party to in the name of Islam. An example is his interview with the Daily Times last month (March 19, 2009).

When asked whether the actions of Swat’s school-blasting warlord Fazlullah were un-Islamic (haram), Sufi said, “the debate on past happenings is disallowed in Islam; a hadith sharif says what has happened in the past should not be discussed”.

Citing another hadith, he further explained that “a Muslim should not discuss past happenings because he may not remember all the (details) and therefore, he may...sin by not speaking the truth.”

Given the coverage Fazullah’s statements and doings received in the electronic and print media over the last couple of years, details of his war crimes could be retrieved, and especially against the army in terms of soldiers killed or beheaded. Therefore, the ‘sin’ of not remembering details seems no more than a lame excuse.

However, there was more to Sufi Muhammad’s interview: he seemed heedless of human conscience and reparative justice. The plight of aggrieved families who lost innocent members during the Taliban’s onslaught on Swat seemed of no concern to him. When asked what measures he was taking to give justice to these families, Sufi invoked his standard response again, saying, “We will not discuss what has happened in the past. Sharia does not allow this.”

Such distortion of sharia that erases history, conscience, and the very essence of justice in the name of Islam amounts to the betrayal of Islam itself.


Such betrayal, were it to go unchallenged, would amount to a “greater sin” in the struggle to wrest Islam from the extremists, going by Khalid Abou el Fadl’s arguments in The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the extremists. (HarperOne, 2005)

Fadl’s book is a clarion call to Muslims to rise against the challenge of extremists holding Islam hostage. An accomplished Islamic jurist and professor of law at the UCLA Law School, Fadl’s book is the most comprehensive account yet published comparing and contrasting a ‘puritanical orientation’ in Islam, represented by the Wahhabi-Salafi consensus, on the one hand, and the ‘moderate orientation’ of the silent Muslim majority on the other.

Whether propounded by extremist groups, Al Qaeda, Lashkar-e Tayyaba, TNSM or the Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan, the ‘puritanical orientation’ is a supremacist ideology “that compensates for feelings of defeatism, disempowerment and alienation with a sense of self-righteous arrogance vis-à-vis the ‘other’ — whether that other is the West, nonbelievers in general, Muslims, or even women.”

At the same time, puritanism is alienated not only from modernity, “but also from Islamic heritage and tradition, literature, aesthetics, music, mysticism, intellectual and cultural history. Religious texts are used “like a shield to avoid criticism or escape challenges that mandate the use of reason and rationality” — as the TNSM chief’s interview amply shows. Indeed, for puritans, “religious texts [are] whips” wielded to further the aims of regressive forces in society.

Puritans “use the inherited tradition and law to silence their opponents and stunt critical and creative thinking.” However, they “are ignorant of jurisprudential theory and methodology, and therefore treat law in whimsical and opportunistic fashion. They search through thousands of statements and sayings attributed to the Prophet [pbuh] in order to find anything that they could use to support their already preconceived positions.”

Given the puritans’ ignorance of psychological and cultural dynamics in textual interpretation, they end up projecting “their social and political frustrations and insecurities upon the text”. Consequently, “if a puritan is angry at the West, he will read the religious text in such a way as to validate this hostility. And if he needs to compensate for feelings of powerlessness by dominating women, he’ll read the text to validate the subjugation and disempowerment of women.”

In fact, “in every situation we find that the proverbial arm of the text is being twisted to validate whatever the puritan orientation wishes to do. All along the puritan claims to be entirely literal and objective and faithfully implement what the text demands without personal interference.”

Fadl further notes that given the intellectual vacuum in the Muslim world, “virtually every Muslim with a modest knowledge of the Quran and the tradition of the Prophet [pbuh] considers [himself] qualified to speak for Islamic tradition and sharia law.”

Small wonder then that the leaders of Wahhabi-Salafi movements such as Al Qaeda, LeT and Jama’at-ud Dawa are not trained jurists but “engineers or medical doctors”. Such self-proclaimed jurists have reduced Islam to a combustible mix of intolerance, hatred and isolationist arrogance, exploding across the world, but most notably among Muslims themselves.

The misuse of sharia, therefore, calls for differentiating between “sharia as a technical, legal system” and “sharia as a symbol of Islamic legitimacy”. That sharia as a symbol is being misused by puritan extremists is as much reflected in the arbitrary fatwas of Al Qaeda as the flogging in Swat.

The question is whether the Supreme Court of Pakistan will remain indifferent following the TNSM and TTP threat that any member of the National Assembly opposed to the Taliban’s sharia will cease to be a Muslim.

Suroosh Irfani is an educationist and writer based in Lahore
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top