National Socialist Heinrich Himmler Fascination With Ancient India

[HeinzGud]

That's a cheap knockoff of Hinduism.

Rather try Upnishads from which Buddhism took inspiration.

You obviously have no idea about Buddhism. So why not stop pretending that it's a cheap knockoff of Hinduism and actually try to understand what it is.

 

[HeinzGud]

I tried Buddhism. And learnt much more about many things.
I can explain your nihilist buddhism in vedic terms.

Obviously you have not tried anything in Buddhism. It has got philosophically nothing in common with Hinduism at all..

 

[HeinzGud]

you see you can't compare Hinduism to Buddhism much less say the latter is superior because it would be like comparing Regular to Diet Coke. One is original, the real deal and contains more real sugar and the other one is mostly composed of some nasty synthetic aspartame shit that the marketers say will make you slimmer and help you lose weight while in reality its really very cancerous and dangerous for your health when taken in large enough doses especially if your a sinhala.

gandhuuuuuuuu

I fin your lack of critical thinking disturbing.

 

[Bharat Ek Khoj]

Obviously you have not tried anything in Buddhism. It has got philosophically nothing in common with Hinduism at all..

You want to talk about how hinduism is as bad as Abrahamic religion, but you want to prove how buddhism is great

 

[HeinzGud]

You want to talk about how hinduism is as bad as Abrahamic religion, but you want to prove how buddhism is great

Obviously. Buddhism is great. What I don't understand is the lack of understanding you people have with it.

 

[Bharat Ek Khoj]

Obviously. Buddhism is great. What I don't understand is the lack of understanding you people have with it.

Typical reply. I didn't say Buddhism is bad. I consider it part of hindu. My problem is when people like you want to advertise religion/faith by declaring others faith bad. How is your faith better than Abrahamic religion then ?

 

[HeinzGud]

Typical reply. I didn't say Buddhism is bad. I consider it part of hindu. My problem is when people like you want to advertise religion/faith by declaring others faith bad. How is your faith better than Abrahamic religion then ?

The problem itself is considering it to be a part of Hinduism.

Well in fact every faith is bad. Buddhism is not a religion in the first place.

 

[Bharat Ek Khoj]

The problem itself is considering it to be a part of Hinduism.

Well in fact every faith is bad. Buddhism is not a religion in the first place.

Thats why I used the word faith too. Actually you are not following Buddhism when you take proud declaring it better than others faith. So you should stop debating on what Buddhism is.

 

[Ancient Indian]

Obviously you have not tried anything in Buddhism. It has got philosophically nothing in common with Hinduism at all..

How did you come to that conclusion?
If you observe my post history, you will find many people abusing and provoking me.
Had I lost cool in those cases?

If there is no influence of Buddhism, I would have gone another way.
Old Hindu culture won't allow this kind of compassion.

 

[HeinzGud]

Thats why I used the word faith too. Actually you are not following Buddhism when you take proud declaring it better than others faith. So you should stop debating on what Buddhism is.

Thought you people are more accommodating than that. My mistake.

 

[Bornubus]

You obviously have no idea about Buddhism. So why not stop pretending that it's a cheap knockoff of Hinduism and actually try to understand what it is.

Man someone needs to bring this Lankan to his senses, he is hilarious.

So you are selling Buddhism to an Indian (the birth place of Buddhism) that too a Kshatriya which happened to be the caste of Buddha too. Next you claim you are Lankan Kshtriya

Should i need to remind you that Indians discarded Buddhism as a separate religion thousands of years ago ?

We already had a organized religion when Buddha was searching for "truth"

----------------------------------------
Why should we follow Buddhism when it teaching is similar to Upnishads rejecting Brahman domination , idol worship and Rituals etc.

You see that's the beauty of Hinduism, i can easily denounce idol worship and Hindu rituals and follow the path shown by Upnishads similar to Buddhism.


Hinduism is not a religion but a spiritual tree for Humanity, All Dharmic "religion" are Branches of this great tree.


But you can sell your Snake oil but please exempt us Indians who are you Spiritual forefather.

 

[Ancient Indian]

Thought you people are more accommodating than that. My mistake.

We can't help you, mate.
If you go through my Bhakthi Related thread, I had posted zen related music.

Where did you get the assumption that we are less accommodating?
Your nihilist Buddhism is nothing but some variation of nirguna brahman.

Read this,

The term Nirguna does not mean that Brahman is a negative concept, the Brahman is a non-entity or zero. It means that the qualities found here in limitation, are found illimitable in Brahman. It means that the attributes are Brahman's essential nature or His Svarupa. It means that Brahman does not possess perishable qualities of matter like the blue colour of a cloth but possesses all auspicious qualities (Sarva-Kalyana-Gunas). Brahman is Nirguna-Guni. So also, by Nirakara, it does not mean that Brahman is formless. It means 'He has not got a limited form as that of objects, but has a form unimaginable.' What form can you attribute to infinity? Many have a crude idea of Brahman. They say "Brahman is a block of stone because He has no qualities. He is a regular void, a zero." No. No. They are entirely mistaken. They have not made Sadvichara. They have various doubts. They have a gross intellect which is unfit for philosophical investigation (Vichara), discrimination, reflection, ratiocination, etc. They have not studied the infallible Upanishads, the right means of knowledge, the right source of wisdom which gives an accurate knowledge of Brahman. Upanishads are infallible, because they appeal to the reason of every thinker, every philosopher. They tally with the experiences of realisation. Hence they are infallible. Their authority is more valid than that of perception or inference. Brahman is extremely subtle. He is finer than a thousandth part of a point of a hair divided into a thousand parts. A subtle, calm, pure, sharp-pointed, clear and one-pointed Suddha Buddhi is needed for understanding and meditating on Brahman. They suffer from Samasya-Bhavana, doubts regarding the validity of the Upanishads, and the true nature of Brahman. They should purify the mind by selfless service, should study the Upanishads, should develop the four means of qualifications, should have constant Satsanga. Then, they will have intellectual conviction and intellectual grasp of Brahman. By Sravana, by Manana and by Nididhyasana they reach Brahman. This is the royal road. So, Brahman is full of auspicious Gunas. He is a lump of luminosity. He is Prajnana-Ghana. He is a solid mass of knowledge. He is really more solid than the Himalayas. Knowledge is more heavy and more concrete than a huge block of stone.

 

[Bharat Ek Khoj]

Thought you people are more accommodating than that. My mistake.

Now dont cry. You jumped into Hindu related discussion and started selling Buddhism. It would have been more acceptable if you have stitched to your problem with Hinduism.

 

[HeinzGud]

Now dont cry. You jumped into Hindu related discussion and started selling Buddhism. It would have been more acceptable if you have stitched to your problem with Hinduism.

I find Hinduism to be as same as Greek mythology with some philosophical touch. My problem is that you people compare it with Buddhism and calming Buddhism is a offshoot of Hinduism. That is wrong.

 

[HeinzGud]

Man someone needs to bring this Lankan to his senses, he is hilarious.

So you are selling Buddhism to an Indian (the birth place of Buddhism) that too a Kshatriya which happened to be the caste of Buddha too. Next you claim you are Lankan Kshtriya

Should i need to remind you that Indians discarded Buddhism as a separate religion thousands of years ago ?

We already had a organized religion when Buddha was searching for "truth"

----------------------------------------
Why should we follow Buddhism when it teaching is similar to Upnishads rejecting Brahman domination , idol worship and Rituals etc.

You see that's the beauty of Hinduism, i can easily denounce idol worship and Hindu rituals and follow the path shown by Upnishads similar to Buddhism.


Hinduism is not a religion but a spiritual tree for Humanity, All Dharmic "religion" are Branches of this great tree.


But you can sell your Snake oil but please exempt us Indians who are you Spiritual forefather.

I thought Kshatriya's were all murdered by a some king. Well what do I know. In fact no one cares about Buddha's cast. It's irrelevant to his teachings. Ksatriya's are just like everyone else. So why is this fuss?

That's why Buddha taught your ancesters about the fallacy of your so called organized religion.

Ok tell me what is the basic point of this so called Upanishads? What is the ultimate purpose of the life according to the Upanishads?

 

[Ancient Indian]

@Bornubus
The term brahman is different from the term brahmin.

Our people use the word brahman when they are talking about Brahmam, Para Brahmam and other related words.
Where as brahmin refers to the person belongs to brahmin caste.

Note the difference,
Brahman - you can omitt 'n' here.
Brahmin

 

[Ancient Indian]

I thought Kshatriya's were all murdered by a some king. Well what do I know. In fact no one cares about Buddha's cast. It's irrelevant to his teachings. Ksatriya's are just like everyone else. So why is this fuss?

That's why Buddha taught your ancesters about the fallacy of your so called organized religion.

Ok tell me what is the basic point of this so called Upanishads? What is the ultimate purpose of the life according to the Upanishads?

Read above post to clear your confusion with basic words.

We already have similar discussion longtime back in atheist thread.

 

[Bharat Ek Khoj]

I find Hinduism to be as same as Greek mythology with some philosophical touch. My problem is that you people compare it with Buddhism and calming Buddhism is a offshoot of Hinduism. That is wrong.

What is your qualification ? Veda ? Geeta ? Upanishads ?
I think you read Greek Mythology too much and compare it to hindu. Or you are going through wrong forums/websites on internet.

Is rebirth available in Buddhism only ??
Is Karma available in Buddhism only ??
Is Mudra available in Buddhism only ??

 

[HeinzGud]

What is your qualification ? Veda ? Geeta ? Upanishads ?
I think you read Greek Mythology too much and compare it to hindu. Or you are going through wrong forums/websites on internet.

Is rebirth available in Buddhism only ??
Is Karma available in Buddhism only ??
Is Mudra available in Buddhism only ??

How attain Nirvana is only available in Buddhism only. That is the point.

 

[HeinzGud]

Read above post to clear your confusion with basic words.

We already have similar discussion longtime back in atheist thread.

I want to compare the key basic principles between the two.