- Joined
- Aug 20, 2010
- Messages
- 7,869
- Likes
- 23,268
Actually both were equal in terms of their evil designs but as an Indian, Nazis took the initiative to help us (even for selfish sake, considering that not supporting INA then could not have made much difference to Hitler or Hirohito) and hence were strategically better off.You have made some valid points.
I want to know your position. Do you think the British Empire was worse than Nazi Germany or was the British Empire better than Nazi Germany from an Indian point of view as per things that happened on the ground?
Unfortunately, those who're grown up in the guilt industry harvested by the over-liberal governments of Europe and west, fail to see that the very geostrategic principles their countries and alliances use against third countries are nothing but derivatives of Nazi Germany with the mere difference of being used under the term "democracy". So superior race theory is eliminated here, there are some elections "held" (how do we know what's the counting behind the scene of each vote? THAT no one even bothers to analyze ) but EVERYTHING military and strategic remains EXACTLY the same as what Hitler had thought at that time:
"The prosperity of a nation must come through tears of war".