Missile test NOTAMs

[cyclops]

.....................................................................................................

Prahaar..................................??

 

[kurup]

Prahaar..................................??

Entire test area is over BoB .... so not a land based system .

 

[kurup]

..............................................................................

 

[cyclops]

Entire test area is over BoB .... so not a land based system .

So a surface to air missile.............

 

[Enquirer]

So a surface to air missile.............

or a surface-to-surface.
Ship based Prahaar??
Prahaar could go on Landing crafts..

 

[Advaidhya Tiwari]

or a surface-to-surface.
Ship based Prahaar??

150km ranged ship based ballistic missile makes little sense IMO. 150km is too small a range to be meaningful while attacking via navy. Added to it is that prahaar is ballistic missile.

 

[Enquirer]

150km ranged ship based ballistic missile makes little sense IMO. 150km is too small a range to be meaningful while attacking via navy. Added to it is that prahaar is ballistic missile.

There's talk of fitting even Pinaka rockets (65kms) on LPD/LPH!
These need to sanitise the coast before landing the troops!
Pralay also could go onto these...

 

[Indx TechStyle]

There's talk of fitting even Pinaka rockets (65kms) on LPD/LPH!
These need to sanitise the coast before landing the troops!
Pralay also could go onto these...

Building up expeditionary forces?

 

[Chinmoy]

Prahaar..................................??

Let's not forget Astra. It's induction tests are not yet completed and the time for induction is arriving. It might be it's full range test against a simulated live target.

 

[kurup]

So a surface to air missile.............

Either Ship launched or Air launched .

 

[cyclops]

Either Ship launched or Air launched .

I hope it is air launched SFDR.

 

[Skdas]

I hope it is air launched SFDR.

Are hope ke chakkar me mat pado... Hum K5 ke hope me baithe the... Uski koi khabar to aai nahi

 

[kurup]

Are hope ke chakkar me mat pado... Hum K5 ke hope me baithe the... Uski koi khabar to aai nahi

Official conformation of SLBM tests are not going to happen ...... We may hear about the K5 test being conducted in some reports few weeks from now ( hoping) .

 

[happylion]

As per Indo- pak treaty SLBM launches need not be clarified or announced. So any K5 test may not be officially confirmed. Remember K15 and K4 have undergone multiple tests before actually announcing some tests.

 

[Enquirer]

As per Indo- pak treaty SLBM launches need not be clarified or announced. So any K5 test may not be officially confirmed. Remember K15 and K4 have undergone multiple tests before actually announcing some tests.

The treaty calls for notification of ALL ballistic missile tests - launched from LAND OR SEA!
Only cruise missiles are exempt.

May I suggest exercising more discretion (read: restraint) and thought before you open your mouth!

 

[Craigs]

The treaty calls for notification of ALL ballistic missile tests - launched from LAND OR SEA!
Only cruise missiles are exempt.

May I suggest exercising more discretion (read: restraint) and thought before you open your mouth!

Who is going to enforce the treaty?

 

[Enquirer]

Who is going to enforce the treaty?

One doesn't need an enforcer!
All bilateral treaties (including ones between US & Russia) are signed with mutual trust.
It's up to each of the countries in the treaty to comply with it or not.
Breaking treaties normally signals to all other countries that the country cannot be trusted. As such no other country will be willing to deal with them; sometimes the consequences could be as bad a war!

 

[Craigs]

One doesn't need an enforcer!
All bilateral treaties (including ones between US & Russia) are signed with mutual trust.
It's up to each of the countries in the treaty to comply with it or not.
Breaking treaties normally signals to all other countries that the country cannot be trusted. As such no other country will be willing to deal with them; sometimes the consequences could be as bad a war!

Do we trust Pakistan, do they trust us? INF treaty between USA and Russia is already defacto collapsed so has the ABM treaty. We stick to a treaty as long as it suits us. We can blame the other party and break the treaty as in INF treaty by USA. Who is going to verify?

Right now we have the upper hand, time to dump all useless treaties with Pakistan. Otherwise, we will suffer the same fate as Prithviraj Chauhan once again.

 

[happylion]

The treaty calls for notification of ALL ballistic missile tests - launched from LAND OR SEA!


Only cruise missiles are exempt.

May I suggest exercising more discretion (read: restraint) and thought before you open your mouth!

Tone down your language. Any clarifications can be done in a civil manner.
SLBM tests have in the past nor been notified. Multiple K15 tests were not notified just as an example. Probable excuse being some of these are not pure ballistic with a porpoise trajectory to get around notification.
Also if you read the agreement multiple tests are allowed in a launch window so one notification can be used to hide other launches if we read between the lines. Very likely tests have been done under cover of Agni launches.

 

[mayfair]

if we read between the lines.

That's the key, all treaties are worded such that they can be interpreted in many different ways.

@Enquirer, can you lay off your condescension and bravado for a bit? Let's not turn all discussions into slangers. We are not Pakis or commies.