mavles ihctep
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2016
- Messages
- 554
- Likes
- 599
Guys contract still not signed,no need to celebrate
India-US sign Rs 5,000 cr deal for 145 M777 Howitzer gunsGuys contract still not signed,no need to celebrate
“India has today signed the Letter of Acceptance which formalises the contract between India and US for these guns,” PTI sources said.
Probably it would be signed formally during Carter's visit this month. Although timeline provided for first two system does match with that of the deal, mid of 2017.^^ We have signed the letter of acceptance i.e. we have officially agreed to the US government offer to purchase 145 M777 Howitzers from BAE and then hand them over to us for $737 million. Now the US DoD will formally sign the contract with BAE to supply these guns to Indian army. This process is termed as Foreign Military Sales or Government-to-Government sales.
From our side, things are done.
You mean the agreement between US DoD and BAE? Because we have nothing left to sign with US on this, our job is done. Now we await the delivery of the first guns.Probably it would be signed formally during Carter's visit this month. Although timeline provided for first two system does match with that of the deal, mid of 2017.
These kind of short range rockets too are of no use if you think logically. At an elevation of 45 degree they are going to give you maximum range, that too of 2 km. Means you need to be at border within the range of enemy AMR to fire these. On other hand M777 could give you a minimum range of 24 km. Although you can't shoot and scoot with these short of guns, but in mountainous warfare neither you could shoot and scoot with any small Mortars. As far as WLR are concerned, they can't triangulate your positions with just a single shot. You need to fire a volley of shots for WLR to locate your position, then too the EP would not be 0.Are you sure M777 can be moved after each shot as Chinese have Artillery locating radars? If we fire from one side their artillery would attack us using radar. I think instead of this buying mobile rocket artillery like this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_cm_Nebelwerfer_41 would be better. First few shots of Howitzer matter most because after this enemy seek cover. But using this type of highly mobile rocket artillery within first few seconds we can unleash volley of fire causing more damage and then immediately move as Chinese have artilery locating radars.
Okay but I do think we can use range of this MLRS by using modern technology and rockets. I also read that in case of artillery, first few rounds do most damage by that time enemy becomes alert and seek cover. Now in first 20 seconds M777 can fire roughly 3/4 rounds while MLRS can fire at least 12-16 rockets. MLRS also tend to devastate an area by just one salvo which takes less than one minute too fire. So do you think in this field MLRS is ahead of conventional guns?These kind of short range rockets too are of no use if you think logically. At an elevation of 45 degree they are going to give you maximum range, that too of 2 km. Means you need to be at border within the range of enemy AMR to fire these. On other hand M777 could give you a minimum range of 24 km. Although you can't shoot and scoot with these short of guns, but in mountainous warfare neither you could shoot and scoot with any small Mortars. As far as WLR are concerned, they can't triangulate your positions with just a single shot. You need to fire a volley of shots for WLR to locate your position, then too the EP would not be 0.
Accuracy is the name of game here. With MBRL like Pinaka or Smerch, you need intensive calculation in between firing to recalibrate them to hit a specific area or point. But with any cannon, its much easier. You can't expect the rocket fired from tube 2 of an MBRL to hit the same spot as that of the one fired from tube 1. But with a cannon, you could hit the same spot as much as you want. That's the reason why India is developing guided Pinaka, and there is Excalibur for M777.Okay but I do think we can use range of this MLRS by using modern technology and rockets. I also read that in case of artillery, first few rounds do most damage by that time enemy becomes alert and seek cover. Now in first 20 seconds M777 can fire roughly 3/4 rounds while MLRS can fire at least 12-16 rockets. MLRS also tend to devastate an area by just one salvo which takes less than one minute too fire. So do you think in this field MLRS is ahead of conventional guns?
I never said to completely phase out conventional artillery. And why bother about pin point accuracy when you destroy the entire area? You need to readjust your conventional guns because a single conventional gun's firing will not decimate the area but a volley from MLRS can.Accuracy is the name of game here. With MBRL like Pinaka or Smerch, you need intensive calculation in between firing to recalibrate them to hit a specific area or point. But with any cannon, its much easier. You can't expect the rocket fired from tube 2 of an MBRL to hit the same spot as that of the one fired from tube 1. But with a cannon, you could hit the same spot as much as you want. That's the reason why India is developing guided Pinaka, and there is Excalibur for M777.
Both MBRL and Howitzers have there unique place in battle field. You can't mix up both of them. MBRL is more of an Area damager, whereas Howitzer is a point damager. When you want sniper firing, you don't call in guy with machine gun.
What you are saying is true for general purpose. In vast plain of Punjab or in desert of Rajasthan these things are true. But when it comes to mountainous warfare, things are different. Even in Kargil we used Pinaka along with Bofors. How many hit you think Pinaka scored? Why you think we came up with Steep dive Brahmos MkII for mountain warfare? A single 500 kg warhead would have been enough to take out whole area, isn't it?I never said to completely phase out conventional artillery. And why bother about pin point accuracy when you destroy the entire area? You need to readjust your conventional guns because a single conventional gun's firing will not decimate the area but a volley from MLRS can.
In Kargil War, Indian troops fired 250,000 shells, how many of them hit Pakistanis? Meanwhile MLRS in conventional engagement can quickly neutralize an entire area, routing enemy completely and then change position. 2 different philosophies. There is no guarantee that you will hit target with your first round, so you need to recalibrate, in MLRS whether you heat or not, massive 100kg warhead destroys everything by blast impact.
Why you derailing every artillery thread with the tube vs rocket arty discussion? There is a separate thread for that.I never said to completely phase out conventional artillery. And why bother about pin point accuracy when you destroy the entire area? You need to readjust your conventional guns because a single conventional gun's firing will not decimate the area but a volley from MLRS can.
In Kargil War, Indian troops fired 250,000 shells, how many of them hit Pakistanis? Meanwhile MLRS in conventional engagement can quickly neutralize an entire area, routing enemy completely and then change position. 2 different philosophies. There is no guarantee that you will hit target with your first round, so you need to recalibrate, in MLRS whether you heat or not, massive 100kg warhead destroys everything by blast impact.
The local partner is Mahindra and after the initial lot that will be flown over from the US, the rest will be "assembled" locally. I do hope they have looked in to the issue of spares and support and that's why it took so long to finalise this deal.Tell me more about its spare parts supply. Barrel is Titanium, which reduces the weight. But can other parts be made locally.