- Joined
- May 21, 2016
- Messages
- 3,966
- Likes
- 20,402
footnote to add, since i just get to read it on Trishul-Trident blogIn all honesty it is not case of ruusi supply line but of 'tech'
because even on WhAP we put those ruusi 30mm autocannon 2A42M instead of what west could easily have offered us in same calibre; and because OFB was already making them en masse for various projects here from BMP-2 to those naval CRN-91 etc;
and we've been making Tin-72 and so here since years now; it was already said somewhere that we've indigenised the engines for both Tin-72 and Tin-90ASS here;
coming back to Cummins and so; they are making some powerful 4-cylinder engine for american light combat vehicle projects whatever called "Advanced Combat Engine // ACE" which is a scalable design ranging from 750hp to 1500hp one; this may very well power vehicles ranging from Stryker to Bradley to potentially Abrams too in those newer IC engine forks etc; and i believe this ACE thing is also lighter in mass (weight) than currently available options
so most likely Jorawar was trying to benefit from this and similar engine projects from west but...it turned out to be a bad story
jab ghar me hi Royal Ordnance L7 105mm barrel//turret hai (from Vijayanta) aur Tin-72 ka 1000 hp wala uprated engine hai jo khaas Himalay ke liye hi banaya gya hai fir bahar itna muh maar rhe hai thoda kam se chala lete toh ab tak Jorawar ban gya hota
so, Tin-72 engine uprating to 1000 hp was done successfully but fully utilising it is still a problematic thing for us because...lack of suitable gearbox system for that ; Tin-72's existing gearbox and transmission is not that ideal for this uprated engine and may require newer better one for uprated one
probably this was one of reason this engine was not considered...but then again they could've gone 'ek teer se do nishan' and consulted Cummins or so for developing gearbox that we could use in both tanks in theory at least