Due respect but that's a load of bull poop. How can we mango men advise the professionals in IAF on what they should be doing? It's almost like we think they don't know their job or that we can do a better job than them, at any rate.
If the ASQR for Mk2, AMCA & TEDBF allowed a 73kN Kaveri in the engine bay then why would IAF get in the way? Wouldn't they be the happiest to get these planes earlier as the end users? But they are targeting a certain capability like super cruise and they have a power requirement based on that. It's not like we have a solution in hand and still we are pushing for a JV over looking the home grown stud, are we?
A mature Kaveri is being considered for HLFT-42 and has an outside chance for Tejas Mk1/A MLU. There is a future trajectory for Kaveri as elucidated here..
But if we want mission 470 in the next two decades we can't be putting pen to paper now for a 110kN engine. Do we even have a homegrown program targeting that spec? Is any in house effort being made at all in GTRE???
Hence, JV.