When HAL initially quoted high price it included some part of engine assembling. With IAF requesting low prices , that equation was taken out to reduce costs. I think we are ending up with 6.5m per engine.How do you know?
HAL has to maintain these engines at it's facilities. And if something was holding up this deal so far, it must've been related to offsets and some ToT related to maintaining the engines and doing overhauls.
Actually the OEM responsibility is to build aircrafts. Not order spares for IAF operational readiness. It's the IAF which needs to order spares for future maintenance.Its interesting to note that most are worried about engine spares and availability during war/ in case of sanctions.
1 . The GE404-IN20 contract just wont include the engines - but also will include spares.
2 . We are ordering 100 engines for an order of 83 aircraft (considering we already had about 50 engines available) that means we have about one spare engine per aircraft
3. The MTBO for this engine should be in the order of 3000 hours (MTBF - 6000 hrs?) - that means for a 2 hour sortie, at least 1000 sorties before a full overhaul. 1000 sorties, considering that the aircraft can do lets say 5 sorties a day (typically 2-3 sorties) - will take 200 days of intense war!!
So, even if we do get sanctioned - this is well enough to take care of our workload for the near future!.
So geo-politics aside, this is some simple (ok - over simplifying things) - we should have enough to keep the fleet flying for quite some time.
They do come up with LOTS of GAS often times...Wat abt dat plan where drdo will integrate kaveri with tejas. They said they will comeup with prototype in 2021 defence expo.
Also trust GE exec to take pay an visit to WH to clear engine orders in case of monkey business by adversaries. It affects there bottom line/revenue projections etc. when stakes are big.Its interesting to note that most are worried about engine spares and availability during war/ in case of sanctions.
1 . The GE404-IN20 contract just wont include the engines - but also will include spares.
2 . We are ordering 100 engines for an order of 83 aircraft (considering we already had about 50 engines available) that means we have about one spare engine per aircraft
3. The MTBO for this engine should be in the order of 3000 hours (MTBF - 6000 hrs?) - that means for a 2 hour sortie, at least 1000 sorties before a full overhaul. 1000 sorties, considering that the aircraft can do lets say 5 sorties a day (typically 2-3 sorties) - will take 200 days of intense war!!
So, even if we do get sanctioned - this is well enough to take care of our workload for the near future!.
So geo-politics aside, this is some simple (ok - over simplifying things) - we should have enough to keep the fleet flying for quite some time.
PD radar, fly-by-wire flight control, F404 engine, delta wing layout, the level of early fourth-generation fighters,Its interesting to note that most are worried about engine spares and availability during war/ in case of sanctions.
1 . The GE404-IN20 contract just wont include the engines - but also will include spares.
2 . We are ordering 100 engines for an order of 83 aircraft (considering we already had about 50 engines available) that means we have about one spare engine per aircraft
3. The MTBO for this engine should be in the order of 3000 hours (MTBF - 6000 hrs?) - that means for a 2 hour sortie, at least 1000 sorties before a full overhaul. 1000 sorties, considering that the aircraft can do lets say 5 sorties a day (typically 2-3 sorties) - will take 200 days of intense war!!
So, even if we do get sanctioned - this is well enough to take care of our workload for the near future!.
So geo-politics aside, this is some simple (ok - over simplifying things) - we should have enough to keep the fleet flying for quite some time.
1- Mk1A has AESA radar.PD radar, fly-by-wire flight control, F404 engine, delta wing layout, the level of early fourth-generation fighters,
1. The LCA currently entering the Indian Air Force are all PD radars.1- Mk1A has AESA radar.
2- Gripen, Rafale, Eurofighter, Tejas all have delta wing and fly by wire and are 4++ gen fighters.
Source?When HAL initially quoted high price it included some part of engine assembling. With IAF requesting low prices , that equation was taken out to reduce costs. I think we are ending up with 6.5m per engine.
It is the american way of deal : zero ToT.Zero. may be a few screwdrivers and foldable staircases.
Why would you replace a 83-85 kN afterburning engine with an engine that produces 75 kN afterburning thrust?? Please do some research before making such points.By now tejas should have safran m88 engine , yet we are with general electric f 404
MK1a is all Aesa and MK1 are MMR like J10 variants,1. The LCA currently entering the Indian Air Force are all PD radars.
2. They are canard wings, LCA is delta wings, the aerodynamic performance and the difficulty of flight control programming are not the same level
That is not called assistance. That is ToT for maintenance. They transfer "know-how" on how to maintain the engine, the parts and equipment needed to test engines on benches and then in chambers and then on the aircraft. And don't take that for granted, it is a BIG part of any engine deal for HAL, which as the Tejas OEM has to be able to service the engines that develop faults at IAF bases or their own facilities.That is called assistance, not the ToT. HAL is competent enough to maintain small issues but if any critical parts fail then HAL has to go to GE or have to buy parts off the shelf.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
LCA Tejas: Photos & Footages (no text other than headings) | Military Multimedia | 87 | ||
LCA TEJAS and what makes it stand out | Knowledge Repository | 8 | ||
W | Rise of LCA Tejas Multi Role Fighter Aircraft | Indian Air Force | 23 | |
C | LRUs or parts of LCA Tejas Made and designed in India | Indian Air Force | 16 |