Khalistan Terror Activities

[Vinash]

Why do Raita Hindus continue to attack guys like Jagdish Tytler?

 

[Vinash]

This guy is correct.

Raita Hindus keep simping for Sikhs when Sikhs keep spitting at them.

RW has a very large % of cucks with no spine.

 

[mist_consecutive]

Why do Raita Hindus continue to attack guys like Jagdish Tytler?

If some Khalistani god forbid assasinates Modi, wouldn't you want BJP leaders to seek revenge?

How is Jagdish Tytler wrong for what he did in the aftermath of Indira's assasination?

Oh, so avenging Modi is to kill innocent Sikhs & their families ?

This guy is correct.

Raita Hindus keep simping for Sikhs when Sikhs keep spitting at them.

RW has a very large % of cucks with no spine.

It cannot be denied that Congress & its disastrous policies were fully responsible for the rise of Khalistan & Bhinderwale. As a matter of fact, Bhinderwale was raised & supported as a "strong" political leader to rally Punjab & and its citizens by Congress, something which AAP is doing with Amritpal for a few years.

Not only Congress created this massive clusterfuck of Khalistan, but then proceeded to raid & storm Golden temple, (which ensured 100% of the Sikhs will be pissed off), and thereafter Congress genocided innocent Sikhs to avenge Indira Gandhi's killing.

Finally, with the genocide, they converted this isolated separatist movement into a Hindi-Sikh issue.

If anything, RW Hindus should be siding with Sikhs against Congress, but brainless Khalistanis are hellbent on making this a Hindu-Sikh issue.

 

[angryIndian]

Why do Raita Hindus continue to attack guys like Jagdish Tytler?

If some Khalistani god forbid assasinates Modi, wouldn't you want BJP leaders to seek revenge?

How is Jagdish Tytler wrong for what he did in the aftermath of Indira's assasination?

What is just wrong with you ? What you have just written is very dark stuff and bordering penal crime.

Collective punishment is a very serious war crime according to Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.

Just because some sikhs are khalistani nutjob, you should not paint all Sikhs as such.
Just because a member of a community did the act,there can be no justification for seeking revenge on the entire community.

It will not just lead to a global arrest warrant against the country's leadership, the whole country will be sanctioned and boycotted by the international community.

Khalistan insurgency only grew into the monster it became due to the 1984 riots when thousands of sikhs were mercilessly slaughtered. Entire villages were burned down and killed.Despite it,most sikhs didn't betray India.Infact sikh loyalty to India is the reason why the Khalistan insurgency was easily overpowered.

 

[Vinash]

Oh, so avenging Modi is to kill innocent Sikhs & their families ?

Is there a way to distinguish Sikhs who do stuff like this from normal Sikhs in the aftermath of an assasination.


If a community can't keep it's radicals under control, the moderates of that community will have to face the heat as well.

It cannot be denied that Congress & its disastrous policies were fully responsible for the rise of Khalistan & Bhinderwale. As a matter of fact, Bhinderwale was raised & supported as a "strong" political leader to rally Punjab & and its citizens by Congress, something which AAP is doing with Amritpal for a few years.

Not only Congress created this massive clusterfuck of Khalistan, but then proceeded to raid & storm Golden temple, (which ensured 100% of the Sikhs will be pissed off), and thereafter Congress genocided innocent Sikhs to avenge Indira Gandhi's killing.

Finally, with the genocide, they converted this isolated separatist movement into a Hindi-Sikh issue.

If anything, RW Hindus should be siding with Sikhs against Congress, but brainless Khalistanis are hellbent on making this a Hindu-Sikh issue.

No doubt Congress is responsible but the same Sikhs continued to vote for them even after 1984.

So, if Sikhs themselves don't give an F, why are Raita Hindus triggered by guys like Jagdish Tytler?

 

[Vinash]

What is just wrong with you ? What you have just written is very dark stuff and bordering penal crime.

Collective punishment is a very serious war crime according to Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.

Just because some sikhs are khalistani nujbo, you should not paint all Sikhs as such.
Just because a member of a community did the act,there can be no justification for seeking revenge on the entire community.

It will not just lead to a global arrest warrant against the country's leadership, the whole country will be sanctioned and boycotted by the international community.

Khalistan insurgency only grew into the monster it became due to the 1984 riots when thousands of sikhs were mercilessly slaughtered. Entire villages were burned down and killed.Despite it,most sikhs didn't betray India.Infact sikh loyalty to India is the reason why the Khalistan insurgency was easily overpowered.

In a country with average IQ of 82 with 1+ billion population, you think collective punishment won't happen?

Idealism vs Realism

Idealistically, yes only people responsible for crime should be punished. But that's not reality.

 

[Varoon2]

Again, the riots in Delhi in 1984 were awful. But a prime minister was killed by her own bodyguards, people who are supposed to be way above sectarian/religious concerns. Far above the ordinary every day citizen. If security guards can just shoot someone they are sworn to protect, then what about people to whom such vows have little meaning. Combined with repeated terror attacks in Punjab starting in 1981 itself, involving bus and train massacres, a slaughter of employees and editors of the Hindustan Samachar newspaper, and considerable casualties endured during the Golden Temple operation, the anger and resentment built up must have been huge. The Sikhs in 1984 were positively not the Kashmiri Hindus of 1990, or other groups like Coptics in Egypt, Jews and Bahais in Iran, Yezidis in Iraq and for that matter ethnic Indians in Uganda and Fiji. All these latter did not so much as throw a pebble at anyone, yet they suffered persecution of different kinds.

 

[Vinash]

There is no difference between what happened in the aftermath in 1984 & 2002.

Hindus should either oppose both or support both.

Any Hindu who supports 2002 while feeling bad for 1984, is a grade 1 Hypocrite.

I personally see it as Karma catching up in both cases.

 

[mist_consecutive]

Is there a way to distinguish Sikhs who do stuff like this from normal Sikhs in the aftermath of an assasination.

How is effigy burning a violent/terrorism act? This is a common way of protesting worldwide. Congress & CPM workers hold more violent protest than this.

If a community can't keep it's radicals under control, the moderates of that community will have to face the heat as well.

Pretty, pretty childish statement. You should evaluate your decision to post online. Khalistanism is not even 5% of Islamic terrorism.

No doubt Congress is responsible but the same Sikhs continued to vote for them even after 1984.

So, if Sikhs themselves don't give an F, why are Raita Hindus triggered by guys like Jagdish Tytler?

RW hindus should give a f because Congress successfully painted Modi as anti-Sikh, culprit of 1984 riots. I have heard people saying Hindus did 1984 riots, not Congress.

Instead, RW hindus should strive to show the world the truth about Congress and Jagdish Tytler.

 

[Vinash]

Pretty, pretty childish statement. You should evaluate your decision to post online. Khalistanism is not even 5% of Islamic terrorism.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it a childish statement.

Khalistan isn't even 5% of Islamic terrorism only because of the low numbers they have. If Sikhs had 50+ Sikh nations, they'd be worse than Islamists.

I've never seen Islamists saying the filth that Khalis are saying about Hindu gods so publicly.

RW hindus should give a f because Congress successfully painted Modi as anti-Sikh, culprit of 1984 riots. I have heard people saying Hindus did 1984 riots, not Congress.

Instead, RW hindus should strive to show the world the truth about Congress and Jagdish Tytler.

Good luck with that.

It's no longer about Congress for the Khalis.

I spoke to a Canadian Khali yesterday. He said multiple times that all the Sikhs in his Gurudwara consider Pakistan to the greatest ally of Khalistanis.

You are underestimating the radicalism that has taken over Khalis.

 

[Vinash]

Gobar Khana, Muth Peena

This is the way Langars are attacking Hindus overseas and @mist_consecutive wants Hindus to be nice to Khalis

 

[Vinash]

Hindu is very Bhenchod says the Khali and @mist_consecutive wants to be nice to them

 

[Vinash]

Langars laughing at the prospect of molesting Hindu women and @mist_consecutive wants Hindus to be nice to Khalis

 

[Butter Chicken]

Langars laughing at the prospect of molesting Hindu women and @mist_consecutive wants Hindus to be nice to Khalis

Most dindus live in alternate reality where they think Sikhs respect Hindus. Their hatred for Hindus is no different from Islamists.
Ask any 5 random Sikhs about "Sant" Bhindiwala

You will easily find McSikhs abusing Hindu gods but struggle to find Hindus abusing Sikh gurus

 

[mist_consecutive]

Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it a childish statement.

Khalistan isn't even 5% of Islamic terrorism only because of the low numbers they have. If Sikhs had 50+ Sikh nations, they'd be worse than Islamists.

I've never seen Islamists saying the filth that Khalis are saying about Hindu gods so publicly.




Good luck with that.

It's no longer about Congress for the Khalis.

I spoke to a Canadian Khali yesterday. He said multiple times that all the Sikhs in his Gurudwara consider Pakistan to the greatest ally of Khalistanis.

You are underestimating the radicalism that has taken over Khalis.

Alright, good luck to you too.

What Canadian or US Sikhs think makes zero difference. What is the combined population of US, Canadian & UK Sikhs compared to India? It's ~ 6% only. They can keep crying as much as they want.

The reality is the majority of Sikhs in India are nationalists. They might dislike Modi, but that doesn't mean they want to kill Hindus and raise Khalistan.

 

[Vinash]

Most dindus live in alternate reality where they think Sikhs respect Hindus. Their hatred for Hindus is no different from Islamists.
Ask any 5 random Sikhs about "Sant" Bhindiwala

You will easily find McSikhs abusing Hindu gods but struggle to find Hindus abusing Sikh gurus

Even if you show them 100 videos of Langars abusing Hindus, they will do some mental gymnastics and say something like "Most Sikhs are not like that Vro"

Reality is, Indian Sikhs can't afford to display certain behavior in public as it'll hurt them both financially and socially. Send all Indian Sikhs to Canada and let's see how many of them continue to be staunch nationalists.

 

[Vinash]

The reality is the majority of Sikhs in India are nationalists. They might dislike Modi, but that doesn't mean they want to kill Hindus and raise Khalistan.

They don't have a choice.

Sikh males make less than 1% of India's population.

They aren't doing us a favor. It's called survival skills.

 

[mist_consecutive]

Gobar Khana, Muth Peena

This is the way Langars are attacking Hindus overseas and @mist_consecutive wants Hindus to be nice to Khalis

Hindu is very Bhenchod says the Khali and @mist_consecutive wants to be nice to them

Langars laughing at the prospect of molesting Hindu women and @mist_consecutive wants Hindus to be nice to Khalis

A classic case of being fooled by enemy propaganda. Few isolated videos, tiktoks recorded by a group of men for the sole purpose of inciting strong emotions.

They represent the whole Sikh community in India for you? So these turbaned persons (not even sure they are Sikh or Muslims) make some video insulting Hindus, sitting in another country, and it triggers you so much that you choose to hate & kill Sikhs in India ?

Tch, tch, tch.

 

[mist_consecutive]

They don't have a choice.

Sikh males make less than 1% of India's population.

They aren't doing us a favor. It's called survival skills.

They have a choice. Compare % of Sikhs enrolling in the armed forces vs. other religious-ethnic communities in India, such as Jains, Sindhis, Muslims, etc. You will get a better picture.

 

[angryIndian]

In a country with average IQ of 82 with 1+ billion population, you think collective punishment won't happen?

Idealism vs Realism

Idealistically, yes only people responsible for crime should be punished. But that's not reality.

Preventing collective punishment is not just a responsibility but an obligation of the government as per UN.

Most massacres happen only due to the state backing the aggressive side.Ask people from Former Yugoslavia about what happens when this sort of crime occurs.