Well , by this point i might as well be a fool , if i still though it was a fake.
Guess i owe a friend of mine some money.
The J-20 is certainly is good looking aircraft , not that it matters much really.
i Certainly am a fan of those deploy able canards , if in fact that's what they are.
I think its a bit too early to be talking about the stealth of an aircraft without actually seeing how it looks underneath.
here is a little front end comparison of the varrious FGFA
A lot of us have had thoughts about the actual size of the J-20.
Here is a little comparison with the J-10 , that i came across as well
for those interested
Some of the missiles that the J-20 could be using
I have doubts about the plane(among many others) regarding the planes ability to use TVC or SC.
One can't just add them latter on as they have to be written into the FCL from the get go. so if they are not on there now , they probably wont be on there when its inducted.
I really think the planes size and also the possible exclusion of TVC , that the J-20 may be a Strike aircraft , with a secondary interceptor role .
That makes it very dangerous in my view, you can very easily carry big cruise missiles on a plane that size , which is frankly its greatest asset in my view.
As a strike aircraft, it has a lot of potential. As long as its stealth holds up.
but its air to air capabilities are rooted to radar and Stealth capabilities and its too early to comment on that.
I like the J-20 , It's size could allow for a gigantic internal weapons bay.
Allbieth radar and engines are still a question make .
I am guessing this aircraft is not cheap , most likely more expensive than the PAk-FA.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For us this under scores the importance of the FGFA to the IAF. We may even see more initial orders of the PAK-fa before the FGFA.
MoD should definitely take note and ensure AMCA is gets their full attention. As well as the development of the Astra missile.