The majority of sri lanka are a scumbag who vote for rajapaksa. So, what can anyone do about that? Sinhalese have forced Tamils into a conundrum. What was the point of antagonising Tamils who were pretty harmless?
Chill Saar!!!
Had sinhala people not did sinhala only policy and kicked out tamil from school and office, there would have been no violence. One should understand that lanka and tamil nadu were close since ancient times and it was obvious that there would be tamils in lanka. Sinhala itself is tamil+pali+Sanskrit.
I'd say we better let it go.
Wrongs must be compensated or punished. There is no cut off date to differentiate past from present. Evil is evil. It is not their country. God didn't gift them the land. They were no different than Tamils there. Tamils are not invaders like muslims. It is just like treating jains and sikhs badly in India by banning them from office and schools.
As long as salt is rubbed on old wounds, they won't heal.
Imagine , if u keep Tamil in mainstream and treated them as indigenous of ur soil , then u don't have to go in war against a Crypto-Christian Vatican funded terrorist org and now have joind Dharmic allience against desert cult .
That is what I am saying. If Sinhalese stop voting Rajapaksa type anti tamil president, Sri Lanka will have a decent govt. Tamils are not insane people who want everyone who is not a tamil dead. Tamils in Lanka only want peace which Sinhalese themselves spoil by voting Rajapaksa. If Sinhalese unite with Tamils, declare them as indigenous people, the two can unite against the evil cults of the west. The evil people coming by boatloads can be avoided easily.
Sinhalese can't declare Tamils as indigenous people because they certainly are not. Those Tamils of North and East have fairly recent arrivals during the colonial rule just like the State workers in the Central hills. The only difference is that there are no credible sources to confirm the fact of the arrival of Jaffna Tamils unlike their counterparts the state workers.
We can't treat them that because they are not indigenous. They have to accept the fact that in order for them to live in Sri Lanka they need to assimilate with the Sinhalese people. Other than that there is no option.
Then first punish the IPKF soldiers and it's leaders before teaching us how to behave. Set an example then we might follow you.
Can u shed some light on what these demands were?
Well before there was Sinhala only policy, there was English only policy. No one cared about Tamil identity back then. Not even after the independence. Tamils were very happy with English only policy. So why did Tamils have to get riled up by the Sinhala only policy. It was stipulated that the act of 1956 gave 5 years to get accustomed with the Sinhala only policy. It is rather shameful to note that the Tamils cannot speak the language of the majority of the people of the country they are living on. So who are to be blamed?
Following are the demands of the 1985 Thimpu talks based on the Vadukodai resolution in 1976.
Why wouldn't they want to preserve their Identity.
Sinhala is not a pure and original language. Why should anyone speak it is a question
The difference between tamil nadu and lanka is goo little to say they were not indigenous. It is actually strange that sinhala became a language at all considering it is an impure mix of Sanskrit + Pali + Tamil
Don't you think Sinhala is a corrupt language and culture? Don't you you see that earlier Lanka was hindu and spoke Sanskrit or other Indian languahe. How do you think Rama communicated with Ravana/Vibheeshana? The foolish people gave up their culture and language and became Sinhala. Don't you think people who gave up their culture are foreign?
