ISRO General News and Updates

mokoman

New Member
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
6,484
Likes
34,873
Country flag
ISRO PLANS FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY USE IN SPACE
WEDNESDAY, MAY 19, 2021 BY INDIAN DEFENCE NEWS



On 28 January, 2021, the UR Rao Satellite Centre (URSC) of Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) invited proposals for the three phase development of a 100 Watt Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG). As ISRO’s lead centre for design, development, fabrication, and testing of all Indian-made satellites, the centre envisions using RTG for power generation and thermal management of ISRO’s deep space missions. With plans of setting up a space station, and launching the first Indian human space flight mission, Gaganyaan; the first Indian solar observatory, Aditya L-1; the second Indian space telescope XPoSat; Mangalyaan-2 to Mars; Chandrayaan-3 as a reattempt to land on the Moon; and the Venus orbiter mission Shukrayaan; ISRO has embarked on a monumental journey of exploring remote and challenging environments. It has told the world that India does not want to be a nascent space player anymore.

Against this backdrop, the decision to invest in nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) appears inevitable. RTGs are not new but the use of nuclear energy for launching rockets had been long given up, though small nuclear-powered rovers like the US’s Perseverance have been in use. RTGs were first used in space during the Cold War in 1961 for the US’s Transit-4A Mission. Since then, the erstwhile Soviet Union had launched over two dozen nuclear-powered space objects. However, budget constraints, complicated designs, progress in alternative sources of energy, and the possibility of escalation of the Cold War led to the curtailment of nuclear propulsion projects.

RTGs are not new but the use of nuclear energy for launching rockets had been long given up, though small nuclear-powered rovers like the US’s Perseverance have been in use


Now, as the importance of the space frontier and the desire to make new scientific discoveries increase, nuclear power sources have come into the spotlight once more. RTGs provide power by using thermocouples to convert thermal energy generated by the natural decay of radioactive isotopes into electrical energy. They are highly reliable and maintenance-free as the absence of moving parts in thermocouples reduces the chances of failure and wear out. Nuclear-propelled rockets are more fuel efficient and lighter than chemical rockets. Hence, they would travel further, are faster, and would shorten the trip time. At the India Energy Forum, the US Energy Secretary, Dan Brouillette, emphasised this when he claimed that the new fuel would allow a trip to and from Mars on ‘one tank of gas’. “What would take years, would take only months (now),” he said. This would also prove beneficial for human space travel. The astronauts’ exposure to harmful space radiations would be lessened, thereby, decreasing the mission’s overall risk. The Chief Engineer of NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate, Jeff Sheehy, notes “the longer you’re out there, the more time there is for stuff to go wrong”.

Nuclear or radioactive energy can be employed both as an alternative to and a complement of other sources of energy. This is seconded by former ISRO Chairman, AS Kiran Kumar, who calls RTG ‘futuristic’. RTGs are an unmatched alternative to solar power. Solar power is not an option for space objects meant to operate on the dark sides of planets where sunlight is obscured. Its intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the celestial body and the sun, hence, space objects sent to far off missions require an alternative source of energy. RTGs are independent of solar proximity and planetary alignment. This characteristic would help in minimising constraints like the ‘launch windows’ that the scientists have to operate within. More crucially, the current research is focused on developing radioisotope thermoelectric systems, which can provide thrust for interplanetary travel only, thereby, complementing the chemical rocket thrusters that launch the spacecraft beyond the low Earth orbit.

Even with the above-mentioned advantages over conventional sources of energy, nuclear space reactors stir controversy due to the inherent safety challenges. There is a risk of radioactive contamination, with a rocket explosion, disintegration or re-entrance into the atmosphere. However, if the highest standards of safety— keeping in mind both humans and the environment— are adopted, such risks can be minimised. A Seattle-based company, Ultra Safe Nuclear Technologies (USNC-Tech), claims to have designed an NTP engine that could protect the crew from being exposed to radioactive particles during the flight.

Nuclear space reactors stir controversy due to the inherent safety challenges. There is a risk of radioactive contamination, with a rocket explosion, disintegration or re-entrance into the atmosphere

After the re-entry of nuclear-powered KOSMOS 954 into the atmosphere in 1978, the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) adopted ‘Principles Relevant to the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space’ which recognise that “for some missions in outer space, nuclear power sources are particularly suited or even essential owing to their compactness, long life, and other attributes”. It allows the use of nuclear reactors and radioisotope generators to operate on interplanetary missions and in sufficiently high orbits. ISRO, adhering to its commitment to the principle, has explicitly mentioned in the January document that “the unit should be able to [be] resilient to any pre-launch or post-launch explosion so as to not cause any nuclear contamination in the environment”. While chemical-powered rockets opened the door, nuclear energy would take humanity deeper into the space.

Source>>
NASA RTG on moon (1971)

20kg , 40cm x 46 cm , giving 75 watt over 10 years

damn these things are small , dont weight much and give constant power with no maintanence

 

Willy3

New Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Messages
1,463
Likes
4,470
Country flag
Project devil India's first project for ballistic missile.
Isro was main contributer of this program. This project failed.

View attachment 90893
Lets appreciate how much IG invested in defense self reliance and other aspects despite our political and social environment priorities other stuff then military industrial complex.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
Is ISRO currently in off mode completly ?
I think they are working silently on some core technologies for future because even during pandemic time they send SCE-200 engine prototype to Ukraine for testing.
ISRO's factories had been working at a fraction of capacity during COVID lockdowns even which gone down the drain due to lack of oxygen supply in past one month.

Only R&D on certain technologies and missions which have ample logistics supply is going on or like Chandrayaan-3 and Gaganyaan given these projects have a political significance. So, it isn't going to be a sudden comeback for ISRO at least in term of launches.

My own has suffered a lot due to halted supply of oxygen and argon. We replaced gas cutting with plasma which doesn't give clean surfaces and has to machined more but without argon. Fabrication too was completely halted last month. Our subcontractors don't have supplies even yet and production is running low.

Probably agencies in US, Russia and China themselves were having an ecosystem and supply chains while here in India, we are too integrated and dependent upon each others. Not just large companies, roadside factories and single room workshops too are lifeline of India's industrial economy.

Industrialized! but in the style of "third world".
 
Last edited:

Gessler

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
2,312
Likes
11,249
Country flag
ISRO's factories had been working at a fraction of capacity during COVID lockdowns even which gone down the drain due to lack of oxygen supply in past one month.

Only R&D on certain technologies and missions which have ample logistics supply is going on or like Chandrayaan-3 and Gaganyaan given these projects have a political significance. So, it isn't going to be a sudden comeback for ISRO at least in term of launches.
These lockdowns & resultant deep hibernation of ISRO is the best example as to why you cannot & should not depend on ISRO to deliver military needs. Satellites that represent crucial strategic capabilities have been delayed indefinitely.

We badly need DSA and we needed them yesterday.

Imagine if Armed Forces stopped conducting patrols & operations because they're scared of COVID. Space is as important a domain of warfare & intelligence today as the Air was in WW2.

And even during 1st wave which was relatively mild, ISRO was perhaps the only major space agency in the world who completely shut off all launch operations for almost whole year. NASA/ULA, SpaceX, Roscosmos, ESA, CNSA, JAXA, Israelis & even f@cking Iranians were conducting launches but not ISRO.

They're management is pathetic, frankly speaking. They are in need of serious overhaul especially on executive level. I cannot imagine us putting humans in space with this type of 'we are not competing with anyone' mentality & scientists sitting in management positions on which they have no expertise. Sometimes can't help but think even IAS sarkari babus could do a better job at the executive level in ISRO.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
These lockdowns & resultant deep hibernation of ISRO is the best example as to why you cannot & should not depend on ISRO to deliver military needs. Satellites that represent crucial strategic capabilities have been delayed indefinitely.
Actually shit went deep since they chose fragile vendors. DoS tried to create an ecosystem like US in 1980s to increase production suddenly but since India has small roadside factories and not large corporates like US, they weren't able to negotiate to get resources to operate in situation.

As told before, India is just another third world nation like Pakistan and Bangladesh in terms of situation. In our case, a large number of farms and textile get replaced by metal processing, pharmaceutical and aerospace factories. But after all, capital is low and hence quality is.
 

omaebakabaka

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
4,945
Likes
13,835
Lets appreciate how much IG invested in defense self reliance and other aspects despite our political and social environment priorities other stuff then military industrial complex.
Considering the facts at the time on the ground, they did not. It was crucial time and we failed to play power politics inspite of having bigger and better economy than Chinese.
 

Articles

Top