- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 31,122
- Likes
- 41,041
Afaik, Arihant is a hybrid ( SSN+SSBN+SSGN ) is design for multi-role ..
Yeah, obviously! Its pure business. Thats why Ruskis shouldn't claim "special nature of relationship" and "deep bonds" and cry a river when contracts go elsewhere.its business my friend...
why blame the russians.... when GOI could have bought it much cheaper rate during relatively good times they didnt... now everyone knows India needs subs ASAP... so why not earn some extra profit...!!
agreed... well everyone makes noise when they dont get the deal... US UK germany all cried when they didnt get MMRCA deal... who cares...!!Yeah, obviously! Its pure business. Thats why Ruskis shouldn't claim "special nature of relationship" and "deep bonds" and cry a river when contracts go elsewhere.
If you want favoritism while applying for contracts, then reciprocate from the other end as well. Else shut the eff up and do professional business.
building a copy with in years can only be done by tony stark dude.I remember 2 engineer in nuclear submarine project got killed and now leasing of second ssn.Did those people cracked how to make ssn like akula in india and the bookies and govenment killed as it would kill their huge kickbacks ?
A SSBN should theoretically be capable of performing the role of an SSGN with the right modifications. As such, an Arihant SSBN should be capable of performing the SSGN role sometime in the future.Afaik, Arihant is a hybrid ( SSN+SSBN+SSGN ) is design for multi-role ..
IMO your theory might just hold true if the power output is really just 83 MW. Is there any chance that this is not true????A SSBN should theoretically be capable of performing the role of an SSGN with the right modifications. As such, an Arihant SSBN should be capable of performing the SSGN role sometime in the future.
But with a relatively weak power output of the nuclear reactor, Arihant is unlikely to reach the speeds of a traditional SSN. Without speed, Arihant will neither be able to give chase to enemy ships nor flee from hostile ASW operations.
That does not imply that it cannot hunt ships. It could most definitely undertake ambushes, especially along predictable routes. But it will be unable to catch up with an enemy ship.
So I'll stick my neck out and say that while it will be an effective SSGN and an SSBN, its role as an SSN is highly doubtful
AFAIK, there is a design project ongoing for the development of a 180 MW reactor for the next gen SSBNs/SSNs. But that is still quite sometime away and there is no guarantee the new reactor will be designed to be fitted on the first gen Arihant(s).IMO your theory might just hold true if the power output is really just 83 MW. Is there any chance that this is not true????
our infra is not that matured yet to make a good ssn/ssk.we need assistance for some more time till we pick up.the ultimate appraisal for our indigenous effort always lies in acceptance of our products for exports.till then..i didt mean copy but they might have been in developing blueprint for ssn.Even ssk is possible when they can build ssbn but just netas crook mindset is playing here
so you mean to say that 83 mw is too tiny for such a submarine.how much ideally it should be.are we developing 180mw power reactors.A SSBN should theoretically be capable of performing the role of an SSGN with the right modifications. As such, an Arihant SSBN should be capable of performing the SSGN role sometime in the future.
But with a relatively weak power output of the nuclear reactor, Arihant is unlikely to reach the speeds of a traditional SSN. Without speed, Arihant will neither be able to give chase to enemy ships nor flee from hostile ASW operations.
That does not imply that it cannot hunt ships. It could most definitely undertake ambushes, especially along predictable routes. But it will be unable to catch up with an enemy ship.
So I'll stick my neck out and say that while it will be an effective SSGN and an SSBN, its role as an SSN is highly doubtful
I'm not saying its too tiny for the Arihant. For its envisaged role as an SSBN, the power output should be enough. After all, its envisaged role is to patrol the deep sea and preserve India's second strike capability. It is not required to chase or attack ships.so you mean to say that 83 mw is too tiny for such a submarine.how much ideally it should be.are we developing 180mw power reactors.
A SSBN should theoretically be capable of performing the role of an SSGN with the right modifications. As such, an Arihant SSBN should be capable of performing the SSGN role sometime in the future.
But with a relatively weak power output of the nuclear reactor, Arihant is unlikely to reach the speeds of a traditional SSN. Without speed, Arihant will neither be able to give chase to enemy ships nor flee from hostile ASW operations.
That does not imply that it cannot hunt ships. It could most definitely undertake ambushes, especially along predictable routes. But it will be unable to catch up with an enemy ship.
So I'll stick my neck out and say that while it will be an effective SSGN and an SSBN, its role as an SSN is highly doubtful
We have thing called "target of opportunity" which can be shot down during a mission while not actually planned. Arihant has a sped which is higher than DE sub and lower than a true hunter killer. But even with the speed it has, she is capable of sinking subs and ships if properly positioned and will be far more effective than a DE sub while not as effective as a Nuke sub.@Decklander Sir, i said before, You have not gone through his and my post..
As Arihant is not modified for such purpose but design from scratch for such purpose, She is the most small nimble SSGN/BN in the world if i am not mistaken, Her reactors are enough for her size ..
Navy wont give out her true specs ..
True submerged speeds are classified for all submarines of the world, so it would be very speculative to term it the most nimble SSGN/SSBN out there. But yes, She should be nimble considering that she weighs in just over 6000 tons surfaced, which is around 2000 tons below the Akula.@Decklander Sir, i said before, You have not gone through his and my post..
As Arihant is not modified for such purpose but design from scratch for such purpose, She is the most small nimble SSGN/BN in the world if i am not mistaken, Her reactors are enough for her size ..
Navy wont give out her true specs ..
Very low-standard article even for a Pakistani. It has nothing to say except that India Navy has acquired an unprecedented capability (in INS Chakra) & should there be an intent, tables can be turned on neighboring maritime nations. So, everyone should protest.INS CHAKRA: A POTENTIAL THREAT TO INDIAN OCEAN STABILITY | Opinion Maker
INS CHAKRA: A POTENTIAL THREAT TO INDIAN OCEAN STABILITY
A Pakistani perspective
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Russia says fake news about US naval team visiting INS Chakra N-Sub was planted by French lobby | Indian Navy | 10 | ||
Paki khujli due to INS Chakra induction.. | Pakistan | 3 | ||
N | INS Chakra to be inducted on April 4th | Indian Navy | 13 | |
Is Indian Navy's newest sub INS Chakra worth the price ? | Indian Navy | 1 |