Indian Special Forces (archived)

[Predator707]

The activity of Indian forces not even special forces but Indian force cannot be denied though these claims can be true but still their evidence are not satisfactory at any level on the other side Indian claims and the evidence information available in public is much more potent than pakistani, though i dont find these things to proud of because if these things are getting exposure than we have some lags in our planning and execution.

And the matter with the tattoo up their can anyone explain ??

 

[Bornubus]

The 9 para officer's Mess contain a timeline Plaque which mention their Battle honors and operations starting from July 1 1966 till now.

Like few ops in between -

1978 Siachen Expedition

Operation Trident Leh and Beyond 1987 (China ??)

And most importantly Trans LOC Ops 1998


This is the same timeline when cross border raids were common before 2003 Cease fire announced.


But surely the 9 para operator wearing the Afghan attire not Kashmiri but why ?

There are no Afghans terrorists in the valley, all those who operated in 90s were wiped out and many of them ran away like Mast Gul "major"

Secondly this is the mandate of SG not Para.


PS - This is only my opinion not a Claim.

 

[Bornubus]

That also reminds me the famous stand off with China in 1987 (Bloodless Conflict) the same year they mention op Trident 1987 - Leh and Beyond.

Even Para were send during the Chumar Stand off in 2015.


However no details are available.

 

[rkhanna]

Deleted

[Please enter a message with at least 30 characters.]

 

[Predator707]

The 9 para officer's Mess contain a timeline Plaque which mention their Battle honors and operations starting from July 1 1966 till now.

Like few ops in between -

1978 Siachen Expedition

Operation Trident Leh and Beyond 1987 (China ??)

And most importantly Trans LOC Ops 1998


This is the same timeline when cross border raids were common before 2003 Cease fire announced.


But surely the 9 para operator wearing the Afghan attire not Kashmiri but why ?

There are no Afghans terrorists in the valley, all those who operated in 90s were wiped out and many of them ran away like Mast Gul "major"

Secondly this is the mandate of SG not Para.


PS - This is only my opinion not a Claim.

A huge amount of information indeed, those who can understand will learn something new from this message of yours, i find one thing which can be related to this recently in POK a wave of protest was felt and i sincerely doubt that either 9 or 4 can be the reason of it.

we cannot underestimate the sources army must had established in the past few decade with the help of RAW in POK and may be more deep inside pakistan.
About the afghan attire, only the afghan cap who is also known as Pakol is bit common in pakistan so to blend with possible terrorist in the deep woods and give the terrorist the first look as pakistani they wear that... maybe..

 

[Bornubus]

A huge amount of information indeed, those who can understand will learn something new from this message of yours, i find one thing which can be related to this recently in POK a wave of protest was felt and i sincerely doubt that either 9 or 4 can be the reason of it.

we cannot underestimate the sources army must had established in the past few decade with the help of RAW in POK and may be more deep inside pakistan.
About the afghan attire, only the afghan cap who is also known as Pakol is bit common in pakistan so to blend with possible terrorist in the deep woods and give the terrorist the first look as pakistani they wear that... maybe..

RAW is essentially an external agency so no doubt it would be operating in en nations.

But the question is what assets they deploy in such places - Mercenaries, Militia whom Paki's call terrorists or SG ?

One thing is sure that it's damm effective and anonymous unlike few exceptions like cdr Kulbhushan (allegedly)

 

[Bornubus]

Which round penetrated through that wall from distance ?

 

[Bahamut]

View attachment 10225

Which round penetrated through that wall from distance ?

50 caliber from a anti material rifle can do it

 

[Bornubus]

50 caliber from a anti material rifle can do it

Yes but who are using .50 ? Maybe be Vidhwansak.

 

[Bahamut]

Yes but who are using .50 ? Maybe be Vidhwansak.

Most probably it is Vidhwansak but it is definitely not a very heavy machine gun so it leaves only a Anti material rifle

 

[Bornubus]

Most probably it is Vidhwansak but it is definitely not a very heavy machine gun so it leaves only a Anti material rifle

Why bother ! Call in a BMP it's cannon could rip apart that wall within seconds

 

[Bahamut]

Why bother ! Call in a BMP it's cannon could rip apart that wall within seconds

A anti material rifle is quicker and does less damage to surrounding area plus more flexible

 

[Bornubus]

Actually its not because of ammo but the two of many construction mark all over the building.

 

[Predator707]

RAW is essentially an external agency so no doubt it would be operating in en nations.

But the question is what assets they deploy in such places - Mercenaries, Militia whom Paki's call terrorists or SG ?

One thing is sure that it's damm effective and anonymous unlike few exceptions like cdr Kulbhushan (allegedly)

I can assume that to counter pakistan, there are two fronts which RAW may be using one is from Afghanistan where the pashtun recruits can be the assets and the other one is SG, The structure of SG allow them to work as the hand of RAW in POK and deeper inside pakistan.

 

[Predator707]

One of my friend in 12 para confirmed that the dirty dozens got new lot of Barret .50 caliber and the thing is quite understandable that if the newly born battalion can get the Barret the elite and more experienced SF Units can get these weapons 6-7 years ealier..

 

[aditya g]

We have a large itbp contingent in Afghanistan. We should depute pata sf personnel to itbp and subsequently post them out to Afghanistan for practical experience.

By day "embassy security"

By night "clandestine ops"

The 9 para officer's Mess contain a timeline Plaque which mention their Battle honors and operations starting from July 1 1966 till now.

Like few ops in between -

1978 Siachen Expedition

Operation Trident Leh and Beyond 1987 (China ??)

And most importantly Trans LOC Ops 1998


This is the same timeline when cross border raids were common before 2003 Cease fire announced.


But surely the 9 para operator wearing the Afghan attire not Kashmiri but why ?

There are no Afghans terrorists in the valley, all those who operated in 90s were wiped out and many of them ran away like Mast Gul "major"

Secondly this is the mandate of SG not Para.


PS - This is only my opinion not a Claim.

 

[Bahamut]

How about this sniper for our SF

 

[Predator707]

The riffle is very unique and a perfect replacement for VSS but did you observe the power he have to put when we was pulling its bolt back and the fluency or the bolt seems negligible in this video, though we cannot assume the capabilities of a sniper but as fas as my understanding what we are using now like Suppressed Galatz, suppressed PSG-1 Draganov SVD.

For long range shooting MARCOS have OSV-96 and they can make it quite too by using sub-sonic rounds and suppressor accordingly

 

[Bornubus]

We have a large itbp contingent in Afghanistan. We should depute pata sf personnel to itbp and subsequently post them out to Afghanistan for practical experience.

By day "embassy security"

By night "clandestine ops"

But how do we know that they are already there in Afghanistan even from Northern alliance Times fighting and as Military advisers.

There is a reason why India is closest military Ally of Afghanistan ( NA regime ) after US

Too much info on international forums is not good for national security, maybe a decade later someone would love to share that here in this thread only as DFI exclusive

 

[Bornubus]

How about this sniper for our SF

In my opinion the next GPMG and standard issue Sniper would be "Make in India". Why is IWI setting up shop and doing JV with Indian pvt sector.