Indian Navy Developments & Discussions

Bhumihar

Jako Rakhe Saiyan Mar Sake Na Koi
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
4,945
Likes
14,944
Country flag
Su30 + bramhos is too much for them . Jaguars with harpoon and mirage with exocet can sink their whole surface fleet.

Su30+ bramhos is too sink Chinese carrier if they dare to come into our ocean for fight. Too bad Chinese j15 turned out useless. Now there Carrier are just sitting ducks. Lol.
I had suggested Su30 because of their range and payload, but as long as Pakis get fucked I have nothing against it.

We should also place our Fighter jets with anti ship missiles in Andaman Islands. At least two squadrons with Hardened hangers and a dense air defense.

Imagine just 50 mil $ worth Bhramhos missile taking out 1 billion $ worth Paki navy.
It will take them forever to replenish their fleet.
many people believe our first offence will be air but I suggest Naval action as the very first thing because this will force Pakis to shift warplane down south to defend Karachi.
 

Gandaberunda

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Messages
463
Likes
1,669
Country flag
I had suggested Su30 because of their range and payload, but as long as Pakis get fucked I have nothing against it.

We should also place our Fighter jets with anti ship missiles in Andaman Islands. At least two squadrons with Hardened hangers and a dense air defense.

Imagine just 50 mil $ worth Bhramhos missile taking out 1 billion $ worth Paki navy.
It will take them forever to replenish their fleet.
many people believe our first offence will be air but I suggest Naval action as the very first thing because this will force Pakis to shift warplane down south to defend Karachi.
Mig 29k resting on Vicky's deck disagree with you!
Karachi is at mercy of Indian Navy and mig 29k is waiting for their pakis prey!
 

BangaliBabu

Regular Member
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
163
Likes
323
This would be over burden for navy at present scenario! While on paper it looks superb but actual scenario is meh!
First budget constraints will force navy other procurement to stall then army will ask to hand over control of navy infrastructure to them which navy will never. Similarly IAF wants to hand over to them navy aviation as well as army aviation...
Army doesn't fore go their infantry while navy doesn't want to lose there assets!
Indian Navy wants to be become blue water navy and Navigation security provider of Indian Ocean., With this aim navy should concentrate on Subs, Destroyers frigates IAC-1 costal batteries UAVs and formidable Coast guard. If navy wants to get involve with Pak or bully them that's only in sir creek area...
Pakistan can be taken care by coast guard
This British-era mindset must change drastically. The Army's crybaby tactics are making the IAF and Navy headless warfarers. Either the Army change completely and realign with the Navy & AF for Joint Commands OR they behave in every possible way like the Pak Army,ie, they command the IAF and Navy too. This "My way or highway" attitude is harming national security objectives. And, then there is our Air force, duh!!! They want every bird, EVERY BIRD either made of steel or of flesh, over Indian skies, to be under their thumb. Truly a younger brother of the Army in grabbing the pie. Wonder what if the Navy treated the other two step-brotherly......if this goes on, the Navy will do so , sure!!!!
 
Last edited:

Gandaberunda

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Messages
463
Likes
1,669
Country flag
This British-era mindset must change drastically. The Army's crybaby tactics are making the IAF and Navy headless lions. Either the Army change completely and realign with the Navy & AF for Joint Commands OR they behave in every possible way like the Pak Army,ie, they command the IAF and Navy too. This "My way or highway" attitude is harming national security objectives.
British era mindset is embibed in all tri services not only in army!
Army aviation corps should be with army not with IAF! Similarly navy - Aircraft carrier or coastal naval base operations should be under Navy. Here IAF demands both to be with them and trying to arm twist. IAF wants to be like PAF controling all 3 armed forces but it's ain't possible. Out of all 3 Indian navy is most powerful and mostly self reliant atleast in building ships unlike import hungry IAF and army! By your logic IAF is behaving it's all their highway and highly poking their nose in army/ navy when they couldn't handle their own dying squadrons. Apaches should be under Army aviation corps not with IAF and they're reluctant to hand over to army but they claim navy coastal land bases should be under IAF 😂
CDS ( former army general) thinks IAC2 future ( navy) is not necessary and wants to negotiate 22 Apaches transfer to Army ( again he is looking into his own army background , could have done it earlier only when he was general or forced MoD to place more orders instead of 5 Apaches for army). Now regarding IAF MMRCA his statement indigenous aircrafts was immediately rebutted by IAF chief ( import aircraft). Due you think Tri services will squander their assets or imports?? Heck they won't even share a square foot of land to each other. All have astonishing claims of each other assets to get hold of.
IAF and Army should stop this eyeing pricy toys or import weapons cat race... Navy is only which is deprived of arming to the teeth wrt the coastal line we have!
 

BangaliBabu

Regular Member
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
163
Likes
323
British era mindset is embibed in all tri services not only in army!
Army aviation corps should be with army not with IAF! Similarly navy - Aircraft carrier or coastal naval base operations should be under Navy. Here IAF demands both to be with them and trying to arm twist. IAF wants to be like PAF controling all 3 armed forces but it's ain't possible. Out of all 3 Indian navy is most powerful and mostly self reliant atleast in building ships unlike import hungry IAF and army! By your logic IAF is behaving it's all their highway and highly poking their nose in army/ navy when they couldn't handle their own dying squadrons. Apaches should be under Army aviation corps not with IAF and they're reluctant to hand over to army but they claim navy coastal land bases should be under IAF 😂
CDS ( former army general) thinks IAC2 future ( navy) is not necessary and wants to negotiate 22 Apaches transfer to Army ( again he is looking into his own army background , could have done it earlier only when he was general or forced MoD to place more orders instead of 5 Apaches for army). Now regarding IAF MMRCA his statement indigenous aircrafts was immediately rebutted by IAF chief ( import aircraft). Due you think Tri services will squander their assets or imports?? Heck they won't even share a square foot of land to each other. All have astonishing claims of each other assets to get hold of.
IAF and Army should stop this eyeing pricy toys or import weapons cat race... Navy is only which is deprived of arming to the teeth wrt the coastal line we have!
I also have the same feeling about IAF, but the Army too thinks it has all things covered. Army must look into the IAF and Navy proposals seriously, too. CDS needs to act fast........
 

IndianHawk

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,783
Likes
12,023
Country flag
Being built? LCH initial 15 was built by HAL from their own pocket yet there is no order placed. 83 Tejas will be built only if orders are placed currently 40 Foc Tejas being built that's it.
Sigh . Hal is already sourcing components for mk1a. As airframe is same that of foc lca .

Lch hanger for production of 30 per year is already build and was opened by rajnath Singh.

These are guaranteed orders .
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top