Some of my thoughts on India's strategic choices
India has never chosen the right one on the strategic line since the founding of the country. A country that has gone further and further on the wrong path, yet still feels good and has no sense of crisis? Didn't this remind him instead? In the early days of the founding of India, India's foundation was better than that of New China. However, he chose not to align between the two camps of the United States and the Soviet Union.
In the 1960s, they fought another battle with China. If it were not for the missile crisis that forced China to retreat, India would probably be wiped out, and even the third world leader would not be considered.
The 1970s and 1980s continued to be confused and not far from the US-Soviet relations, allowing China to seize the opportunity to turn to cooperation with the US
India only gradually opened up in the 1990s, but it has long missed a new round of global industrial division of labor.
Until recently the United States intervened in the Asia-Pacific region. India thought it was time to follow the Indo-Pacific Strategy. Not knowing that the United States is now not strong in foreign powers anymore , it can only talk big and give small money. I don't know if India will be sold.
Then there is the construction of the Asia Free Trade Zone. In the case of other countries making huge concessions, India still does not sign a contract, and once again missed the opportunity of industrial restructuring in Asia. Modi has always said that the economy is rising, but there is no industry as a foundation and no foreign trade. Guaranteed, what about the rise? In the future, India's position can only be a dumping market for international goods.
India is such a country that has the self-confidence and erratic position, and will always be immersed in its own world.
If India want to rise , need revolution.