While we banned plastic straws, Russia drilled and doubled nuclear energy production.
www.commonsense.news
Very good , pls ignore the anti Putin rhetoric.
My issue with Modi is he looks to much sucked up into this green energy and climate activism nonsense. When we should be building 4000 MW Coal Power Plants with latest technology backed by captive reserves of coal in East and North India, we are building expensive and less reliable solar and wind farms at expensive cost.
Modi hasn't stopped building coal plants. As for solar, sun doesn't shine in Germany and mf'ers spent a 100's of billions of dollar on solar because of ideology (they don't have good solar profile).
India needs to build nuclear for constant baseload + renewable + coal (for instant scale up when renewable is not available), till there is a feasible storage solution.
Here is the problem with all the fuels :
Renewable (except hydro) - Is not available 24*7. Zero carbon, can be sourced locally as we are setting up manufacturing plants, doesn't need constant fuel, can be recycled at end of 20-30 year lifecycle.
Nuclear - Production cannot be scaled up and down on demand (hence we can't increase electric production at night when sun goes down). Zero carbon. India doesn't have lots of Uranium, but fuel is small in volume, so we can store multi year fuel requirement in reserves, in case of disruption in supply chain.
Coal - Production can be scaled up and down on demand, India has coal reserves (but needs to keep on increasing production YoY to match demand). Dirtiest not only in terms of Carbon emission but also PM2.5 particles, hence causes smog.
Gas - Production can be scaled up and down on demand, India doesn't have much reserves, hence dependent on international market, gas prices in international market very volatile as it is much harder to transport than oil. Low in PM2.5 emission (no smog), 1/3rd of Carbon emission as coal.