I agree and nothing would make me happier than to see our government agencies coming up to scratch with the responsibilities laid out to them. But how can one look at the lopsided performance of the institutions (we still import about 70% of all defence acquisitions, 70%!) and make a case for status quo? Surely not all of it is high tech stuff? Clearly things are not working as they should and I see no fault on trying to bring more resources from the private sectors to deal with this.
The inability of government agencies to address defence needs goes deeper than a corrupt acquisitions process and we should realize that.
We don't import 70%. We import 50% as of now and that is going to go down severely by 2025.
We import heavily because of traitorous people in the politics funded by foreign government which has now been taken care of.
Our scientists have developed a lot of things against all odds and severe restrictions from the government which has to be lauded.
We have developed or are in upper stages of develop in almost everything except for turbofan engine, ramjet, and 5th generation fighter capabilities.
Several items of high end technology are-
PINAKA
Akash SAM
QR SAM
Astra missile
Nuclear submarine
Diesel submarine (though scorpene is designed by MBDA, it has been purchased)
Sonars
Torpedos
Radars
Seekers for Astra
Technology for ship building and aircraft carrier
Satellite surveillance
Ballistic missiles
ATGM - NAG and ToT for Spike
Artillery
LCH
What we are about to complete -
Engine for tanks and complete MBT
Basic Drones
Seekers for Brahmos and Barak-8
UTTAM AESA
Subsonic cruise missile
What critical technology is left to acquire -
Transport planes
Turbofan engine
Turboshaft engine
5th generation capability
Ramjet
High end drones