Indian Ballistic Missile Defense System

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,132
S-300 in Indian service reportedly failed during an exercise.

A dated but relevant article on the subject.
sir still considering that s-300 has a worldwide reputation of being lethal, just look how iran was lobbying hard to get their hands on them recently and why israel and the us raised a hue and cry last december about the possibility of s-300 sales to iran by russia.
the recently developed s-400 is a great upgrade as confirmed by the defence analysts worldover.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
24,915
Likes
22,689
Country flag
any earlier ukranian version knocked a russian blackjack out of the sky in the georgian conflict.
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,132
any earlier ukranian version knocked a russian blackjack out of the sky in the georgian conflict.
yes very true sir i forgot to mention about the recent georgia war it was the most potent weapon the georgians had and its performance was pretty good considering georgia was using some old version.
so i think india can still go for the s-300 upgrade while it builds its own BMS.
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,312
Likes
8,374
Country flag
sir still considering that s-300 has a worldwide reputation of being lethal, just look how iran was lobbying hard to get their hands on them recently and why israel and the us raised a hue and cry last december about the possibility of s-300 sales to iran by russia.
the recently developed s-400 is a great upgrade as confirmed by the defence analysts worldover.
Avi don't sir me dude. I might be younger than you. :D

Israel-US raise a hue and cry at every Iranian move that is nothing new.

S-300 is a great SAM but not the best ABM. I believe India tested them in an ABM role, its shortcomings prompted the failed Arrow ABM purchase.

S-400 can also be employed in conjuction to the MR and LR-SAM being co-developed with Israel and the Indigenous BMD shield consisting of PAD-AAD
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,132
Avi don't sir me dude. I might be younger than you. :D

Israel-US raise a hue and cry at every Iranian move that is nothing new.

S-300 is a great SAM but not the best ABM. I believe India tested them in an ABM role, its shortcomings prompted the failed Arrow ABM purchase.

S-400 can also be employed in conjuction to the MR and LR-SAM being co-developed with Israel and the Indigenous BMD shield consisting of PAD-AAD
ok no sir:D
thats the whole point, you are right that india can use the s-400 in conjuction with the medium and long range sams being developed having a variety of sams will make the air defence mighty strong.
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,312
Likes
8,374
Country flag
I have a question for you guys...doesn't India already have a couple of S-300 regiments protecting the major cities? Why do we need to sink billions of dollars into another SAM program?
I may not be the most qualified to answer this but quite simplistically speaking, each missile is built for a particular purpose.
A Naval SAM such as Barak is used as an anti-missile missile, a SAM such as Tungsuka is used as a low altitude SAM to target low flying objects, a SAM such as Akash is used to target fast moving jets at high altitude.

Though it appears that India is at times procuring similar missiles but all of them serve a different purpose.

S-300 were primarily procured in a BMD role their replacement will most likely PAD/AAD as part of Indigenous BMD programme.

Barak MR/LR-SAM(50-160km? range) being co-developed with Israel will be more technologically advanced than S-300 in service too. S-300 as I said earlier have not performed well in the Indian conditions, Barak MR/LR-SAM is tailor made for Indian conditions and technologically superior to S-300 in service currently.
 

pyromaniac

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
535
Likes
12
its only for ballistic missiles i thought but i may be wrong?

anybody with the answer please.

According to the definition of the treaty.... The MTCR was created in order to curb the spread of unmanned delivery systems for nuclear weapons, specifically delivery systems that could carry a minimum payload of 500 kg a minimum of 300 km. At the annual meeting in Oslo in July 1992 it was agreed to expand the scope of the MTCR to include nonproliferation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for all weapons of mass destruction, making the payload/range threshold much less rigid than the original 500kg/300km.


Since the s-300 and 400 fall under missile's I am guessing that they do have the limit imposed on them.
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,312
Likes
8,374
Country flag
ok no sir:D
thats the whole point, you are right that india can use the s-400 in conjuction with the medium and long range sams being developed having a variety of sams will make the air defence mighty strong.
If it is required than there is full chance to employ it but against Pakistan Enhanced LR-SAMs like the 250mile S-400 will serve no purpose. Most of their assets are based within a 100mile radius of Indian borders anyways.

What is required is a robust highly capable credible Cruise missile defence shield and BMD Shield coupled with agile MR-SAMs to take out any flying object posing a danger to India.

dosen't S-400 and THAAD violate MTCR?
its only for ballistic missiles i thought but i may be wrong?

anybody with the answer please.
I think MTCR is invoked during ToT of nuclear capable missiles
for eg.
UK operates Trident ICBMs.
Turkey is being provided full ToT for S-3/400 system

we had to reduce our Brahmos range because of this BS.
stated range.
anyways a missile like Brahmos is too expensive and heavy too be used for greater range. Imagine a 1200km Brahmos, it will, on extrapolating, cost 8million$ and weigh 12tons. Tomahawk, in comparison, travels 3000km, weighs 1.5 tons and costs under a million$
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,132
According to the definition of the treaty.... The MTCR was created in order to curb the spread of unmanned delivery systems for nuclear weapons, specifically delivery systems that could carry a minimum payload of 500 kg a minimum of 300 km. At the annual meeting in Oslo in July 1992 it was agreed to expand the scope of the MTCR to include nonproliferation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for all weapons of mass destruction, making the payload/range threshold much less rigid than the original 500kg/300km.


Since the s-300 and 400 fall under missile's I am guessing that they do have the limit imposed on them.


i think we need to stress on these lines is the s-400 or thaad capable of delivering nuclear weapons?
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
24,915
Likes
22,689
Country flag
but I know Brahmos 2 hypersonic version definetly going to be much much greater range.
 

pyromaniac

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
535
Likes
12
i think we need to stress on these lines is the s-400 or thaad capable of delivering nuclear weapons?
NO...the s-400 is a SAM and that's it...it can't be re purposed to be say a cruise missile.

THAAD carries on it no explosives but rathers uses Kinetic energy to destroy the projectiles..; Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), formerly Theater High Altitude Area Defense, is a United States Army project to develop a system to shoot down short- and medium-range ballistic missiles using a hit-to-kill approach. The missile carries no warhead but relies on the kinetic energy of the impact. THAAD was designed to hit Scuds and similar weapons, but also has a limited capability against ICBMs.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
24,915
Likes
22,689
Country flag
i think we need to stress on these lines is the s-400 or thaad capable of delivering nuclear weapons?
true but our non-nuclear brahmos range had to be reduced to 390km I know one is offensive and one is defensive/offensive but like anything else rules can be bent if you wrote them.
 

pyromaniac

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
535
Likes
12
but I know Brahmos 2 hypersonic version definetly going to be much much greater range.
If I remember this right, if India succeeds in building a cruise missile that can travel over 1000Km then Russia would be free to help us in any future endeavors. The MTCR treaty only applies to nations that have not demonstrated a proven capability...
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,312
Likes
8,374
Country flag
true but our non-nuclear brahmos range had to be reduced to 390km I know one is offensive and one is defensive/offensive but like anything else rules can be bent if you wrote them.
Brahmos range was never reduced, Yakhont the missile on which its propulsion (ramjet engine) is based on, is again <300km in range. So nothing was reduced but nothing was enhanced either.

Brahmos is a nuclear warhead capable missile.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top