- Feb 16, 2009
Russian failure rate has been on the rise.
sir still considering that s-300 has a worldwide reputation of being lethal, just look how iran was lobbying hard to get their hands on them recently and why israel and the us raised a hue and cry last december about the possibility of s-300 sales to iran by russia.S-300 in Indian service reportedly failed during an exercise.
A dated but relevant article on the subject.
yes very true sir i forgot to mention about the recent georgia war it was the most potent weapon the georgians had and its performance was pretty good considering georgia was using some old version.any earlier ukranian version knocked a russian blackjack out of the sky in the georgian conflict.
Avi don't sir me dude. I might be younger than you.sir still considering that s-300 has a worldwide reputation of being lethal, just look how iran was lobbying hard to get their hands on them recently and why israel and the us raised a hue and cry last december about the possibility of s-300 sales to iran by russia.
the recently developed s-400 is a great upgrade as confirmed by the defence analysts worldover.
ok no sirAvi don't sir me dude. I might be younger than you.
Israel-US raise a hue and cry at every Iranian move that is nothing new.
S-300 is a great SAM but not the best ABM. I believe India tested them in an ABM role, its shortcomings prompted the failed Arrow ABM purchase.
S-400 can also be employed in conjuction to the MR and LR-SAM being co-developed with Israel and the Indigenous BMD shield consisting of PAD-AAD
I may not be the most qualified to answer this but quite simplistically speaking, each missile is built for a particular purpose.I have a question for you guys...doesn't India already have a couple of S-300 regiments protecting the major cities? Why do we need to sink billions of dollars into another SAM program?
its only for ballistic missiles i thought but i may be wrong?
anybody with the answer please.
If it is required than there is full chance to employ it but against Pakistan Enhanced LR-SAMs like the 250mile S-400 will serve no purpose. Most of their assets are based within a 100mile radius of Indian borders anyways.ok no sir
thats the whole point, you are right that india can use the s-400 in conjuction with the medium and long range sams being developed having a variety of sams will make the air defence mighty strong.
dosen't S-400 and THAAD violate MTCR?
I think MTCR is invoked during ToT of nuclear capable missilesits only for ballistic missiles i thought but i may be wrong?
anybody with the answer please.
stated range.we had to reduce our Brahmos range because of this BS.
According to the definition of the treaty.... The MTCR was created in order to curb the spread of unmanned delivery systems for nuclear weapons, specifically delivery systems that could carry a minimum payload of 500 kg a minimum of 300 km. At the annual meeting in Oslo in July 1992 it was agreed to expand the scope of the MTCR to include nonproliferation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for all weapons of mass destruction, making the payload/range threshold much less rigid than the original 500kg/300km.
Since the s-300 and 400 fall under missile's I am guessing that they do have the limit imposed on them.
NO...the s-400 is a SAM and that's it...it can't be re purposed to be say a cruise missile.i think we need to stress on these lines is the s-400 or thaad capable of delivering nuclear weapons?
true but our non-nuclear brahmos range had to be reduced to 390km I know one is offensive and one is defensive/offensive but like anything else rules can be bent if you wrote them.i think we need to stress on these lines is the s-400 or thaad capable of delivering nuclear weapons?
If I remember this right, if India succeeds in building a cruise missile that can travel over 1000Km then Russia would be free to help us in any future endeavors. The MTCR treaty only applies to nations that have not demonstrated a proven capability...but I know Brahmos 2 hypersonic version definetly going to be much much greater range.
Brahmos range was never reduced, Yakhont the missile on which its propulsion (ramjet engine) is based on, is again <300km in range. So nothing was reduced but nothing was enhanced either.true but our non-nuclear brahmos range had to be reduced to 390km I know one is offensive and one is defensive/offensive but like anything else rules can be bent if you wrote them.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|S||Indian Army successfully test fires Nuclear Capable Ballistic Missile Prithvi-II off Odisha coast||Indian Army||0|
|Succint video on Indian Ballistic Missile Programme||Military Multimedia||0|
|Pakistan: Indian ballistic missile system a destabilizing development||Pakistan||23|
|Indian Temple architecture - superb introductory video.||History & Culture||0|