- Joined
- Apr 17, 2009
- Messages
- 43,132
- Likes
- 23,841
Re: Indigenous artillery guns meet parameters; Army orders 100
Our production line of whatever is there to produce is always posting 'slippages' with a variety of excuses and so we cannot be self reliant in whatever we produce even with licence!
And we are not China who claim that everything is original Chinese.
INSAS would be indigenous, because it is not quite a copy. It is an ammalgam of many different established rifle technologies rolled into one. That requires ingenuity and hence no copying in its strict sense. And therefore, indigenous.
PLA is self reliant because they have the production line humming.then why one call chinese pla self reliant? its the only way for starters
Our production line of whatever is there to produce is always posting 'slippages' with a variety of excuses and so we cannot be self reliant in whatever we produce even with licence!
And we are not China who claim that everything is original Chinese.
INSAS would be indigenous, because it is not quite a copy. It is an ammalgam of many different established rifle technologies rolled into one. That requires ingenuity and hence no copying in its strict sense. And therefore, indigenous.
Last edited: