Good riddance if that's true....Was Manishanker Iyer killed in Balakot airstrike? A rumor is spreading in social media... He went there to congratulate the anti india establishment for Pulwama Attacks !
He must be having family here, how can they hide his death.Was Manishanker Iyer killed in Balakot airstrike? A rumor is spreading in social media... He went there to congratulate the anti india establishment for Pulwama Attacks !
It's a false rumor played well!!He must be having family here, how can they hide his death.
Is it easy to deny the existence of even a ordinary citizen let alone aiyyar. I think its a false humor.
OKThere were Pakis in those areas before.
OK.Now it isn't.
There is no imagination involved in military situation. It is there or not there.I imagine.
So the posts are with them !! If you are not on top of it you are not there.there's significant logistical challenges to take those posts. The posts on Pak side would be hard to access from our side and easy to access from theirs.
.So taking those over immediately would be very problematic
you mean you are socialising with the enclave ladies ? Sadbhavana inside the enclave.I think we're normalising those areas as denied areas first before taking over.
OK.We never dominated dagger....
In that case we should have dominated it !!.this dagger was a notorious route for drug peddlers and infiltration spot...
Why do not you say that we have not captured those posts and they are with Pakis. If you are not on top of it then those are with enemy...right now pakis have abandoned their posts...they still waiting to get reclaimed...we are not letting them reclaim it..
Fire power if not able to prevent Pakis coming into enclave is ineffective..calculate the concentration of firepower required to maintain this and join the dots....they are carrying out patrolling but aren't taking positions in their bunkers/posts..........
retake ?? what retake ?? when were they taken ??Correct me if I am wrong. Are the Porkis foolish enough to try and reclaim their posts which are now, and they surely know this, inside the Indian Army's killzone? Won't they open another front to ease off the pressure if they are really serious about retaking their land?
But these guys are admitting that they have not taken anything.I am well aware about this line of thinking. However, I am more interested in finding out what is stopping the PA from opening another front to try to retaliate. Remember, this news of them losing Porki land won't remain hidden for long. They will have to retaliate anyways to try and maintain their images in front of their jaahil suars (like the PAF tried to on the 27th). So why are they not doing so now?
Wah Wah .... happy to read such comments.They lost east pakistan...country cried , kept bitching for 2 yrs and moved on......fast forward to 30 yrs...lost 1999 kargil war...pakis don't care about winning or losing...
Let say they shot down 17 IAF jets and lost entire POK , they will look at that 17 kills and go to sleep thinking they won....at worst case there will be protests and new coas will take up...for that PA won't wrestle with a sumo...
Even BABA says we have pushed the pakis' back... But, I agree with you... The status quo changes only when we occupy a few of these posts ...But these guys are admitting that they have not taken anything.
But opening new sector can be done by IA. Why are they not doing it.Opening new sectors won't solve a thing for PA.
They have faced that for last 70 years. That has not prevented Pak army mischiefs.They'll still face the superior manpower and firepower in that sector. The more sectors they open, the harder to control information.
Then what should IA do ? Start drawing them to war or rather force war on them. That is not big thing - war under nuclear environment ?? Yes possible .....like Kargil.This is the very reason they stopped direct war and opted for assymetric warfare was because they can't directly confront IA.
Smart rats jump sinking ship first.Why is he (Manishanker Aiyar) not seen anywhere since Balakot? Where is he hiding? Why was he not seen the entire election season?
Serious ? I do not think so.Every cfv violation of napaki army is met with serious consequences till now.
I really do not know what you imply by offensive posture ? What has IA done to make you think so.Now the question is will IA continue to keep this offensive posture in future too?
That is the most wise and pertinent question to ask. As a layman I would say that IA should be ready.If a pulwama like incident occurs again, what will be the response of our armed forces?
They will delay this declaration as close to the end of elections as possible as modi may gain political milage through this
So Chinks playing to our tune now?
If they budge,it is a huge victory to India & Co. and a dent to Emperor Eleven's image.
Interestingly it cant be a co-incidence that pakistan also made a statement 2 days ago that we are open to listing azhar if india is delinking him from pulwama. May be they already had clue what was coming there way tommorrow.
So Chinks playing to our tune now?
If they budge,it is a huge victory to India & Co. and a dent to Emperor Eleven's image.
Already mentioned...Vantage points taken...Bunkers aren't....because of logistic issue. paki bunkers are construct to over see Indian bunkers...their rear is exposed to paki side...OK.
.
In that case we should have dominated it !!
Why do not you say that we have not captured those posts and they are with Pakis. If you are not on top of it then those are with enemy.
Fire power if not able to prevent Pakis coming into enclave is ineffective.
Then you are not dominating it by fire.
If Pakistanis are coming to the house - the lady is theirs - plain and simple.