HQ9 anti-missile video

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
3,958
They are 2 different ships, 2 different missiles, 2 different days, 2 different parts of the sea, in 2 different times. The first one is just during a sunset. The second one looks like it is morning because the water looks calm. The seas are different because of the water colour. It is possible the first picture is far away from the coast while the second one is closer to the coast, maybe that explains the water colour. Both tests were carried out in perfect weather conditions.

The first picture is pretty good. It looks like the picture was taken just before the booster rockets kicked in so the missile looks like it is suspended in thin air.
 

Minghegy

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
387
Likes
9
Both of them are HHQ9, the warheads are same, and the fogs of Vertical Cold Launch are same as well.

One ship is real battleship, the other is an weapon experiment ship.
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,140
the last picture is it real or CGI compare the last pic to the second last one will get to know what i am saying


added later...........
ops experts have already nailed this ........
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,813
Likes
6,646
Country flag
all of them are real photo
Actually they are both fake. You can tell in the first photo by the listing of missile. It can't start at an angle until after the rocket motor has begun to power its flight. The 2nd is a fake because the ejection system is not solid fuel, far too much white billowy smoke.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,813
Likes
6,646
Country flag
All Vertical Cold Launch system has an eject angle.

http://v.ku6.com/special/show_2936936/mUHMywGaaoW0Uary.html
drag to 2:10, HQ9 land launch, also has much smoke.
Verticle launchers launch vertically, not at an angle. Your video at 2:14 shows what I am saying perfectly. At 2:10 you will also see that it doesn't emit solid booster white smoke as seen in the 2nd photo before it is finished ejecting. You just proved my point.
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
3,958
Actually they are both fake. You can tell in the first photo by the listing of missile. It can't start at an angle until after the rocket motor has begun to power its flight. The 2nd is a fake because the ejection system is not solid fuel, far too much white billowy smoke.
According to me the first launch is real.

In the 2nd photo it looks like none of the silos are open. There cannot be a launch without an open silo, unless the smoke covered a second set of silos.

It is possible the launch failed, which can explain the smoke.

Or Chinese ejection systems are very smokey, perhaps one of the first launches of the missile.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,813
Likes
6,646
Country flag
According to me the first launch is real.

In the 2nd photo it looks like none of the silos are open. There cannot be a launch without an open silo, unless the smoke covered a second set of silos.

It is possible the launch failed, which can explain the smoke.

Or Chinese ejection systems are very smokey, perhaps one of the first launches of the missile.
You just contradicted yourself... if the ejection systems are smokey, the first picture which you vouch for as real would have more smoke.
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
3,958
That's why I said the test in the second picture may be one of the first launches or even a failed launch. Unlike the 2nd picture the first has no discrepancies. The smoke could be because something burnt out.

That smokey ejection system comment was more as a joke.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
26,473
Likes
29,791
Country flag
why is China still buying s-300 if HQ-9 is developed?? is there any other answer than the obvious??
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
739
why is China still buying s-300 if HQ-9 is developed?? is there any other answer than the obvious??
the last order of S300 was placed in 2005 . CHina placed the order because

1.S300 was very cheap at that time, even compared with HQ9.
2. Chinese factory could not feed the appetite of PLA at that time.
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,140
come on now you dont want u to believe that the fourth picture from the top is real even you can see that have a good look at the fourth pic
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,813
Likes
6,646
Country flag
more launch photo
Why do you Chinese keep posting all these fake pictures? Isn't it obvious to you it is fake? The missile is far bigger than its launch container. Another photochop by 50 cent Army.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top